Profit, Loss and Discount Questions

Multiple choice
  1. If statement I alone is sufficient but statement II alone is not sufficient.

  2. If statement II alone is sufficient but statement I alone is not sufficient.

  3. If each statement alone (either I or II) is sufficient.

  4. If statement I and II together are not sufficient.

  5. If both statements I and II together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Statement I relates SP to MP but not to CP, so profit percentage cannot be found. Statement II gives total profit on 12 items but without CP or SP values, the percentage cannot be calculated. Even combining both statements, we lack information about cost price or the relationship between marked price and cost price, making the profit percentage impossible to determine.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I > Quantity II

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  3. Quantity II > Quantity I

  4. Quantity II ≥ Quantity I

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or Relation cannot be established

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Quantity I: Market price = 1,75,000 × 1.4 = 2,45,000. Selling price after 20% discount = 2,45,000 × 0.8 = 1,96,000. Quantity II: Selling price = 2,52,000. Cost price at 20% profit = 2,52,000 ÷ 1.2 = 2,10,000. 2,10,000 > 1,96,000, so Quantity II > Quantity I.

Multiple choice
  1. If statement I alone is sufficient but statement II alone is not sufficient.

  2. If statement II alone is sufficient but statement I alone is not sufficient.

  3. If each statement alone (either I or II) is sufficient.

  4. If statement I and II together are not sufficient.

  5. If both statement together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Statement I: SP:CP = 4:3 and SP=20000 gives CP = 20000×3/4 = 15000. Profit = 20000-15000 = 5000. Profit% = 5000/15000×100 = 33.33%. Sufficient alone. Statement II: SP-CP = 5000 and SP=20000 gives CP = 15000. Same calculation. Each alone sufficient. C is correct.

Multiple choice
  1. 25% profit/लाभ

  2. 25% loss/हानि

  3. 22.5 profit/लाभ

  4. 22.5% loss/हानि

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Let CP of A = 3x, CP of B = x. A: 25% profit on SP means SP_A = CP_A + 0.25×SP_A, so 0.75×SP_A = 3x, SP_A = 4x. B: 10% loss on CP means SP_B = 0.9×CP_B = 0.9x. Total CP = 4x, Total SP = 4x + 0.9x = 4.9x. Profit = 0.9x on CP of 4x, which is 0.9/4 = 22.5%. Wait, this calculation gives 22.5% which is option C. But let me verify: profit = 4.9x - 4x = 0.9x. Percentage = (0.9x/4x) × 100 = 22.5%. Yes, 22.5% profit is correct.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity II > Quantity I

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  3. Quantity I > Quantity II

  4. Quantity II ≥ Quantity I

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or Relation cannot be established

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Quantity I: SP = 400 * 0.9 = 360 (after 10% discount). With 20% profit, CP = 360/1.2 = Rs.300. Quantity II: SP = 350 * 0.92 = 322 (after 8% discount). With 15% profit, CP = 322/1.15 ≈ Rs.280. Since 300 > 280, Quantity I is greater. Option C is correct.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I > Quantity II

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  3. Quantity II > Quantity I

  4. Quantity II ≥ Quantity I

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or Relation cannot be established

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Quantity I: MP = 400, 10% discount → SP = 360. 20% profit means CP = 360/1.2 = 300. Quantity II: MP = 350, 8% discount → SP = 322. 15% profit means CP = 322/1.15 ≈ 280. Since 300 > 280, Quantity I > Quantity II.

Multiple choice
  1. Only Statement I alone is sufficient.

  2. Statement II and III are sufficient together.

  3. All three statement require together.

  4. Statement I and II are sufficient together.

  5. None of these.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The shopkeeper claims 20% profit on 2 kg, meaning selling price = 2.4 × (price per kg). Statement II reveals he uses 37% less weight, so actual weight for every '1 kg' is only 630g. For 2 kg, customer receives only 1.26 kg but pays for 2 kg. Effective selling price per actual kg = 2.4/1.26 = 1.905 times marked price. Profit = (1.905 - 1)/1 × 100 = 90.5%. Statements I and II together are sufficient.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I > Quantity II

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  3. Quantity II > Quantity I

  4. Quantity II ≥ Quantity I

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or Relation cannot be established

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

For Quantity I: Let CP = x. If CP was 20% less, new CP = 0.8x. Profit = Rs 12 means SP - 0.8x = 12, so SP = 0.8x + 12. At 10% loss, SP = 0.9x. Equating: 0.9x = 0.8x + 12, giving x = 120. So CP = 120. Quantity I asks for CP when sold at 10% loss = 120. For Quantity II: Selling at 20% loss means SP = 0.8 × LP. SP is given as Rs 105, so 0.8 × LP = 105, giving LP = 105/0.8 = 131.25. Since 131.25 > 120, Quantity II > Quantity I.

Multiple choice
  1. The data in statement I alone is sufficient to answer the question, while data in statement II alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

  2. The data in statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question, while the data in statement I alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

  3. The data in statement I alone or statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question.

  4. The data in both statements I and II is not sufficient to answer the question.

  5. The data in both statements I and II together is necessary to answer the question.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Statement I: Let CP = x. Then MP = 2x. With 20% discount, SP = 0.8 × 2x = 1.6x. Profit = 1.6x - x = 0.6x = 90, so x = 150. Statement I alone is sufficient. Statement II: With 40% discount, SP = 0.6 × 2x = 1.2x. Profit% = (1.2x - x)/x × 100 = 20%. This matches the given 20% profit, so Statement II alone is also sufficient (just confirms the pricing structure, which yields the same CP of 150).

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I > Quantity II

  2. Quantity I < Quantity II

  3. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  4. Quantity I ≤ Quantity II

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or no relation can be established.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Let the cost prices be x (sold at 25% loss) and y (sold at 29% profit). Both sell at the same price, so 0.75x = 1.29y = SP. Also x + y = 476. From 0.75x = 1.29y, we get x = 1.72y. Substituting: 1.72y + y = 476, so 2.72y = 476, giving y ≈ 175. Then x = 476 - 175 = 301. Quantity I: CP of profit headset = y ≈ 175. Quantity II: SP of loss headset = 0.75x = 0.75 x 301 ≈ 226. Comparing: 175 < 226, so Quantity I < Quantity II.

Multiple choice
  1. Only A and B together are required

  2. Only B and C together are required

  3. Only either A or C and B together are required

  4. Even with all A, B and C the answer cannot be found.

  5. All A, B and C together are required.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

We need to find profit on cost price. From (A): Mahesh bought at 15% discount on labelled price, so cost = 0.85 × labelled price. From (B): Selling price = Rs. 3060. From (C): Profit = 2% of labelled price, so SP = 1.02 × labelled price. From (C): labelled price = 3060/1.02 = Rs. 3000. Then cost = 0.85 × 3000 = Rs. 2550. Profit on cost = (3060-2550)/2550 × 100 = 20%. All three statements together are necessary - (C) gives labelled price, (A) relates cost to labelled price, (B) gives selling price.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I > Quantity II मात्रा I > मात्रा II

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II मात्रा I ≥ मात्रा II

  3. Quantity II > Quantity I मात्रा II > मात्रा I

  4. Quantity II ≥ Quantity I मात्रा II ≥ मात्रा I

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or Relation cannot be established मात्रा I = मात्रा II या संबंध स्थापित नहीं किया जा सकता है।

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Quantity I: CP=175000, MP=175000×1.4=245000, SP=245000×0.8=196000. Quantity II: SP=252000 at 20% profit means CP=252000/1.2=210000. Since 196000 < 210000, Quantity II is greater.

Multiple choice
  1. x% > y%

  2. x% < y%

  3. x% = y%

  4. Can’t say

  5. None of these इनमे से कोई नही

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

For mangoes: Gain = SP of 11 mangoes. Selling 33 mangoes, gain = 11×SP. Profit% = Gain/CP × 100 = (11×SP)/(33×CP) × 100 = (1/3)×(SP/CP)×100. Also SP-CP = Gain per mango = SP/11. So CP = (10/11)SP, meaning SP/CP = 11/10. Thus x% = (1/3)×(11/10)×100 = 36.67%. For oranges: Gain = CP of 22 oranges. Selling 66 oranges, gain = 22×CP. Profit% = (22×CP)/(66×CP)×100 = 33.33%. Since x% (36.67%) > y% (33.33%), option A is correct.

Multiple choice

Vendors P and Q ordered some mobile sets from the same manufacturer whose manufacturing cost is Rs 8000. The manufacturer imposed total Rs 1920 as shipping charge to vendor P and 1600 to vendor for each order. Both the vendors marked each mobile set 25% above their respective cost prices (manufacturing + shipping) and each allows a discount of 10%. Number of mobile sets ordered in their first order by vendor P and vendor Q is 30 and 20 respectively, then find the total profit earned by vendor P and vendor Q together? विक्रेताओं P और Q ने उसी निर्माता से कुछ मोबाइल सेट मंगवाए जिनकी निर्माण लागत 8000 रुपये है। निर्माता ने विक्रेता P से शिपिंग चार्ज के रूप में कुल 1920 रुपये और प्रत्येक ऑर्डर के लिए और विक्रेता Q से 1600 रुपये लिए । दोनों विक्रेताओं ने प्रत्येक मोबाइल सेट को उनकी लागत मूल्य (विनिर्माण + शिपिंग) से 25% ऊपर चिह्नित किया और प्रत्येक ने 10% की छूट दी। वेंडर P और वेंडर Q द्वारा अपने पहले क्रम में दिए गए मोबाइल सेटों की संख्या क्रमशः 30 और 20 है, तो वेंडर P और वेंडर Q द्वारा अर्जित कुल लाभ एक साथ ज्ञात करें?

  1. 50440

  2. 54400

  3. 50040

  4. 54040

  5. None of these इनमे से कोई नही

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Vendor P: Manufacturing cost = 30 × 8000 = 240000, Shipping = 1920, Total cost = 241920. Cost per mobile = 241920/30 = 8064. Marked price = 8064 × 1.25 = 10080. Selling price = 10080 × 0.9 = 9072. Profit per mobile = 9072 - 8064 = 1008. Total profit = 30 × 1008 = 30240. Vendor Q: Total cost = 160800, Cost per mobile = 8080, Selling price = 9090, Profit per mobile = 1010, Total profit = 20200. Combined profit = 50440.

Multiple choice
  1. I and II Together I और II एक साथ

  2. II and III Together II और III एक साथ

  3. Only III केवल III

  4. All I, II and III Together सभी I, II और III एक साथ

  5. None of these इनमें से कोई नहीं

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Statement III: Gain 20% on CP after 20% discount on MP means SP = 0.8 MP and also SP = 1.2 CP. So 0.8 MP = 1.2 CP, MP/CP = 1.2/0.8 = 1.5, meaning MP is 150% of CP. Increase from CP to MP = 50%. This is sufficient to answer the question. Statements I and II talk about gains but don't connect CP to MP directly. Only Statement III alone gives the CP to MP relationship. Answer C (Only III) is correct.