Civics Polity ยท Law Legal Studies
Judiciary and Legal Systems
1,782 Questions
Judiciary and legal systems form the framework for interpreting laws and delivering justice. Questions in this section explore judicial review, the hierarchy of courts, and the issuance of writs. This topic is crucial for polity and law prelims preparation.
Judicial reviewHigh courts structureIssuance of writsSubordinate courtsPublic interest litigation
Judiciary and Legal Systems Questions
Which body is responsible for hearing and deciding customs appeals in India?
-
The Supreme Court of India
-
The High Courts
-
The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)
-
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)
C
Correct answer
Explanation
The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) is the body responsible for hearing and deciding customs appeals in India. It is a quasi-judicial body established under the Customs Act, 1962.
What is the procedure for filing an appeal to CESTAT?
-
File a memorandum of appeal in the prescribed format
-
Pay the requisite fee
-
Serve a copy of the memorandum of appeal on the lower authority
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
The procedure for filing an appeal to CESTAT involves filing a memorandum of appeal in the prescribed format, paying the requisite fee, and serving a copy of the memorandum of appeal on the lower authority.
Can a party aggrieved by the decision of CESTAT file an appeal to the Supreme Court?
-
Yes, as a matter of right
-
Yes, with the permission of CESTAT
-
No, the decision of CESTAT is final
-
No, unless a substantial question of law is involved
B
Correct answer
Explanation
A party aggrieved by the decision of CESTAT can file an appeal to the Supreme Court with the permission of CESTAT.
How does the doctrine of precedent apply in customs appeals?
-
CESTAT is bound to follow its own previous decisions on similar issues
-
CESTAT is bound to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court on similar issues
-
CESTAT is bound to follow the decisions of other High Courts on similar issues
-
CESTAT is not bound by any previous decisions and is free to decide each case on its own merits
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The doctrine of precedent applies in customs appeals in the sense that CESTAT is bound to follow its own previous decisions on similar issues. This ensures consistency and predictability in the application of customs law.
Which type of judicial review involves a court examining a law to determine if it violates the rights guaranteed by the Constitution?
-
Substantive judicial review
-
Procedural judicial review
-
Strict judicial review
-
Lenient judicial review
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Substantive judicial review involves a court examining a law to determine if it violates the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
Which type of judicial review involves a court examining a law to determine if it was passed in accordance with the proper legal procedures?
-
Substantive judicial review
-
Procedural judicial review
-
Strict judicial review
-
Lenient judicial review
B
Correct answer
Explanation
Procedural judicial review involves a court examining a law to determine if it was passed in accordance with the proper legal procedures.
Which type of judicial review involves a court giving a broad interpretation to the Constitution in order to uphold a law?
-
Substantive judicial review
-
Procedural judicial review
-
Strict judicial review
-
Lenient judicial review
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Lenient judicial review involves a court giving a broad interpretation to the Constitution in order to uphold a law.
Which type of judicial review involves a court giving a narrow interpretation to the Constitution in order to strike down a law?
-
Substantive judicial review
-
Procedural judicial review
-
Strict judicial review
-
Lenient judicial review
C
Correct answer
Explanation
Strict judicial review involves a court giving a narrow interpretation to the Constitution in order to strike down a law.
Which of the following is NOT a power exercised by High Courts in PIL cases?
-
Issuing writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, and quo warranto.
-
Granting interim relief and injunctions.
-
Passing declaratory judgments.
-
Awarding damages and compensation.
D
Correct answer
Explanation
High Courts do not have the power to award damages and compensation in PIL cases. This power is generally exercised by civil courts.
What is the significance of the Supreme Court's judgment in the case of PUCL vs. Union of India (2018) in relation to PIL?
-
It laid down guidelines for the filing and adjudication of PIL cases.
-
It emphasized the need for judicial restraint in PIL cases.
-
It clarified the scope of PIL and the locus standi requirement.
-
All of the above.
D
Correct answer
Explanation
The Supreme Court's judgment in PUCL vs. Union of India (2018) laid down comprehensive guidelines for the filing and adjudication of PIL cases, emphasized the need for judicial restraint, and clarified the scope of PIL and the locus standi requirement.
Which of the following is NOT a type of relief that High Courts can grant in PIL cases?
-
Injunctions
-
Declaratory judgments
-
Writs
-
Damages
D
Correct answer
Explanation
High Courts generally do not have the power to award damages in PIL cases. This power is usually exercised by civil courts.
Which country's constitution explicitly grants the power of judicial review to its Supreme Court?
-
United States
-
Canada
-
United Kingdom
-
Australia
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The United States Constitution explicitly grants the power of judicial review to the Supreme Court in Article III, Section 2, which states that the Court has the power to declare laws unconstitutional.
In which country does the highest court have the power to declare laws unconstitutional, but only after they have been enacted?
-
United States
-
Canada
-
United Kingdom
-
Australia
C
Correct answer
Explanation
In the United Kingdom, the highest court, the Supreme Court, has the power to declare laws unconstitutional, but only after they have been enacted. This is known as retrospective judicial review.
What is the power of the judiciary to declare laws passed by the legislature as unconstitutional called?
-
Judicial Review
-
Legislative Review
-
Executive Review
-
Constitutional Review
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Judicial review is the power of the judiciary to declare laws passed by the legislature as unconstitutional.
Which case established the doctrine of judicial review in India?
-
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
-
Golaknath v. State of Punjab
-
Minerva Mills v. Union of India
-
Marbury v. Madison
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) established the doctrine of judicial review in India.