Simple and Compound Interest Questions

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity : I > Quantity : II मात्रा : I > मात्रा : II

  2. Quantity : I ≥ Quantity : II मात्रा : I ≥ मात्रा : II

  3. Quantity : I < Quantity : II मात्रा : I < मात्रा : II

  4. Quantity : II ≥ Quantity : I मात्रा : II ≥ मात्रा : I

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or relation can't be established मात्रा I = मात्रा II या संबंध स्थापित नहीं किया जा सकता

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Simple Interest for 2 years at 10% = 20% of P. Given interest = 300, so 20% of P = 300, therefore P = 300/0.2 = 1500. Comparing Quantity I (1500) with Quantity II (3000): 1500 < 3000, so Quantity I < Quantity II.

Multiple choice
  1. Q1 > Q2

  2. Q1 ≥ Q2

  3. Q1 < Q2

  4. Q1 ≤ Q2

  5. Q1 = Q2 or relationship cannot be established

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

For CI-SI difference over 2 years: Difference = P[(1+R/100)² - 1 - 2R/100] = P(R/100)². Therefore P = Difference × (100/R)². For Q1: P1 = 100 × (100/9)² = 100 × 123.46 = 12346 (approx). For Q2: P2 = 97 × (100/11)² = 97 × 82.64 = 8016 (approx). Since 12346 > 8016, Q1 > Q2.

Multiple choice
  1. 40%

  2. 10%

  3. 20%

  4. 15%

  5. 25%

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Let principal = P, rate = R%. SI for 2 years = 2PR/100 = 4000, so PR = 200000. CI for 2 years = P(1 + R/100)² - P = P[(1 + R/100)² - 1] = 4800. Expanding and using PR = 200000, we find R = 40%. A is correct. Distractors B, C, D, E don't satisfy the interest difference condition.

Multiple choice
  1. Rs 3000 3000 रुपये

  2. Rs 2500 2500 रुपये

  3. Rs 2400 2400 रुपये

  4. Rs 2450 2450 रुपये

  5. None of these इनमें से कोई नहीं

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Let sum be P. At 8% SI for t years: amount = P(1 + 0.08t). At 7% SI for (t+1) years: amount = P(1 + 0.07(t+1)) = P(1 + 0.07t + 0.07) = P(1.07 + 0.07t). Both equal 4680, so P(1 + 0.08t) = P(1.07 + 0.07t). This gives 1 + 0.08t = 1.07 + 0.07t, so 0.01t = 0.07, t = 7 years. Using P(1 + 0.08×7) = 4680: P(1.56) = 4680, P = 4680/1.56 = 3000.

Multiple choice
  1. Rs 3200 3200 रु

  2. Rs 3000 3000 रु

  3. Rs 3500 3500 रु

  4. Rs 3050 3050 रु

  5. None of these. इनमे से कोई नहीं

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

A's profit = (12% - 7%) × P × 7 = 5% × P × 7 = 0.35P = 1050. Principal P = 1050/0.35 = Rs. 3000. C borrowed Rs. 3000 from A.

Multiple choice
  1. If statement I alone is sufficient but statement II alone is not sufficient.

  2. If statement II alone is sufficient but statement I alone is not sufficient.

  3. If each statement alone (either I or II) is sufficient.

  4. If statement I and II together are not sufficient.

  5. If both statements I and II together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

For simple interest: SI = P × R × T / 100. From statement I: P × R × 3 / 100 = 1200, so PR = 40000. For compound interest: CI = P(1 + R/100)^2 - P = 820. Combining both gives two equations in P and R which can be solved. Neither statement alone gives both P and R, but together they are sufficient.

Multiple choice
  1. Rs. 2400 रु. 2400

  2. Rs. 2450 रु. 2450

  3. Rs. 2750 रु. 2750

  4. Rs. 2600 रु. 2600

  5. None of these इनमें से कोई नहीं

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Let initial sum = P. After 2 years at 20% compound interest: amount = P(1.2)² = 1.44P. Half of initial amount (P/2) is reinvested for 1 more year at 20%: interest = P/2 × 0.2 × 1 = 0.1P. Total interest after 3 years = (1.44P - P) + 0.1P = 0.44P + 0.1P = 0.54P = 1080. So P = 1080/0.54 = 2000. Simple interest at 10% for 2 years: SI = 2000 × 0.1 × 2 = 400. Total amount = 2000 + 400 = 2400. Options B (2450), C (2750), and D (2600) are incorrect amounts.

Multiple choice
  1. Rs 37215 37215 रुपये

  2. Rs 36300 36300 रुपये

  3. Rs 38115 38115 रुपये

  4. Rs 36000 36000 रुपये

  5. Rs 34728 34728 रुपये

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Compound interest for 3rd year is 3630 and for 2nd year is 3300. The difference is 3630 - 3300 = 330, which is the interest on 3300 at rate r%. So 330 = 3300 × r/100, giving r = 10%. Amount after 2 years at 10% CI = P(1.1)² where 2nd year CI = P × 1.1 × 0.1 = 3300, so P = 33000. Amount after 2.5 years = 33000(1.1)² × 1.05 = 36300 × 1.05 = 38115.

Multiple choice
  1. Either I or II is sufficient या तो I या II पर्याप्त है

  2. Both I and II are sufficient I और II दोनों पर्याप्त हैं

  3. Both II and III are sufficient II और III दोनों पर्याप्त हैं

  4. Either I or III is sufficient या तो I या III पर्याप्त है

  5. None of these इनमें से कोई नहीं

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Statement I: P doubles at SI in 10 years means P + P×r×10/100 = 2P → Pr/10 = P → r = 10%. Statement II: For P = 20000, CI - SI = 200. CI - SI = P[(1 + r/100)² - 1] - Pr×2/100 = P[r²/10000] = 20000 × r²/10000 = 2r²/100. Setting 2r²/100 = 200 → r² = 10000 → r = 10%. Statement III: CI > Principal in 9 years doesn't directly give r. Both Statement I and Statement II individually give r = 10%, so either one is sufficient. Option A is correct.

Multiple choice
  1. Rs 120 120 रुपये

  2. Rs 160 160 रुपये

  3. Rs 150 150 रुपये

  4. Rs 400 400 रुपये

  5. None of these इनमें से कोई नहीं

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

Let amount at 6% be x. Then amount at 5% is (4000 - x). Interest at 5% = 0.05(4000 - x) = 200 - 0.05x. Interest at 6% = 0.06x. 'The 5% investment yields interest Rs 145 more than the part invested at 6%' means 200 - 0.05x = 0.06x + 145, so 55 = 0.11x, x = 500. Interest at 5% = 200 - 25 = 175. Interest at 6% = 30. Difference = 145. This matches. But 500 is not in options A-D. Option E 'None of these' is correct.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I > Quantity II मात्रा I > मात्रा II

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II मात्रा I ≥ मात्रा II

  3. Quantity I < Quantity II मात्रा I < मात्रा II

  4. Quantity II ≥ Quantity I मात्रा II ≥ मात्रा I

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or relation can't be established. मात्रा I = मात्रा II या संबंध स्थापित नहीं किया जा सकता

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Quantity I: CI for 3 years at 10% on Rs 12000 = 12000[(1.10)³ - 1] = 12000(1.331 - 1) = 12000 × 0.331 = Rs 3972. Quantity II: SI for 3 years at 20% on Rs 30800 = 30800 × 20% × 3 = 30800 × 0.6 = Rs 18480. Since 3972 < 18480, Quantity I < Quantity II. Option C is correct.

Multiple choice
  1. Rs. 16,400 रु. 16,400

  2. Rs. 15,400 रु. 15,400

  3. Rs. 15,600 रु. 15,600

  4. Rs. 16,500 रु. 16,500

  5. None of these इनमें से कोई नहीं

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Let the borrowed sum be P. After 2 years at 10% compound interest: P(1.10)² = 1.21P. After paying Rs. 6634, remaining debt = 1.21P - 6634. In the third year, this grows to: (1.21P - 6634) × 1.10 = 13200. Solving: 1.331P - 7297.4 = 13200, so 1.331P = 20497.4, giving P = Rs. 15400 (approximately). This is the original sum borrowed.

Multiple choice
  1. Either statement III alone or statements I and II together are sufficient.

  2. Only statement III is sufficient.

  3. Statement I and Statement III together are sufficient.

  4. Only statement I, II, and III together are sufficient.

  5. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Statement III: Sum becomes 4 times in 2 years at CI, so (1+r/100)²=4, which gives 1+r/100=2, so r=100%. This alone is sufficient. Alternatively, using Statement I and II together: Let P be principal. From II, SI for 4 years = 3200, so 4PR/100 = 3200, PR=80000. From I, SI(3y) - CI(2y) = 600. 3PR/100 - P[(1+r/100)²-1] = 600. Substituting PR=80000 gives r=100%. Either III alone OR I and II together work.

Multiple choice
  1. If statement I alone is sufficient but statement II alone is not sufficient.

  2. If statement II alone is sufficient but statement I alone is not sufficient.

  3. If each statement alone (either I or II) is sufficient.

  4. If statement I and II together are not sufficient.

  5. If both statements together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Statement I alone is sufficient. If amount doubles in 8 years under simple interest, then interest = principal in 8 years. Rate = (100 * Interest) / (Principal * Time) = (100 * P) / (P * 8) = 100/8 = 12.5% per annum. Statement II is not sufficient because it only tells us the difference between compound and simple interest (Rs. 345) over 2 years, but we need the principal amount to find the rate.

Multiple choice
  1. If statement I alone is sufficient but statement II alone is not sufficient.

  2. If statement II alone is sufficient but statement I alone is not sufficient.

  3. If each statement alone (either I or II) is sufficient.

  4. If statement I and II together are not sufficient.

  5. If both statements I and II together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

To find compound interest, we need: principal (given as Rs. 12000), rate (Statement I gives 10%), and time period. Statement I alone only provides the rate - we still need the time duration. Statement II gives the difference between CI and SI as Rs. 70, but without knowing either the rate or time, this cannot be used to find the CI. Even combining both statements, we're missing the crucial time period variable. The formula for CI-SI difference involves time, and without it, we cannot determine the actual compound interest amount.