Problems on Ages Questions

Multiple choice
  1. If statement I alone is sufficient but statement II alone is not sufficient.

  2. If statement II alone is sufficient but statement I alone is not sufficient.

  3. If each statement alone (either I or II) is sufficient.

  4. If statement I and II together are not sufficient.

  5. If both statement together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

From statement II: Vivek's present age is 25. Five years ago, Vivek was 20, and the ratio of Vivek:Vishal was 2:1, so Vishal was 10 five years ago. Therefore, Vishal's present age is 15. Statement I only gives a relationship without actual values. Statement II alone is sufficient to find Vishal's age, so both statements together are sufficient but statement II alone is also sufficient.

Multiple choice
  1. Only II

  2. All statements together are sufficient

  3. Only I and II

  4. (I and II) or III

  5. All statements together are not sufficient

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Let Rohit's age be x. Given Rohit:Rina = 1:3, so Rina = 3x. From Statement II: Pooja = 3x - 4. From Statement I: |Pooja - Rohit| = 22. Combining I and II: |(3x - 4) - x| = 22, so |2x - 4| = 22, giving 2x - 4 = 22 (positive since ages are positive), thus 2x = 26 and x = 13, so Rina = 39. Statement III directly gives 3x - x = 26, so 2x = 26 and Rina = 39. Both paths give the same answer, so D is correct.

Multiple choice
  1. If statement I alone is sufficient but statement II alone is not sufficient.

  2. If statement II alone is sufficient but statement I alone is not sufficient.

  3. If each statement alone (either I or II) is sufficient.

  4. If statement I and II together are not sufficient.

  5. If both statements together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

Statement I gives ratio 3:4 but not actual ages. Statement II gives sum after 3 years = 38, meaning current sum = 38-6 = 32. Combining both: if ages are 3x and 4x, then 7x = 32, giving ages ≈ 13.7 and 17.3, difference ≈ 3.6 years. Both statements together are sufficient.

Multiple choice
  1. If the data in statement I alone is sufficient to answer the question.

  2. If the data in statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question.

  3. If the data either in statement I alone or statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question.

  4. If the data given in both I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.

  5. If the data in both the statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Statement I gives the ratio of ages as 2:3. Statement II says 12S = 8R, which simplifies to 3S = 2R or S:R = 2:3 - the same ratio as statement I. Both statements provide the same proportional information but neither gives an absolute age value. With only ratios, there are infinitely many possible ages that satisfy the conditions (e.g., Shivam=20, Ruchi=30 or Shivam=24, Ruchi=36). Therefore, even together, the statements are insufficient.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity II > Quantity I

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  3. Quantity I > Quantity II

  4. Quantity I ≤ Quantity II

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or relationship cannot be established

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Quantity I: C and D's present ages sum to 40. Quantity II: Ram's present age is 32. Thus Quantity I (40) > Quantity II (32). The age ratio problem is solved by setting up equations from the given ratios and time relationships.

Multiple choice
  1. If statement I alone is sufficient but statement II alone is not sufficient.

  2. If statement II alone is sufficient but statement I alone is not sufficient.

  3. If each statement alone (either I or II) is sufficient.

  4. If statement I and II together are not sufficient.

  5. If both statements I and II together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Statement I: M + D = 70. 5 years ago: (M-5) = 3(D-5). Two equations, two variables - solvable. Statement II: M - D = 30. After 10 years: (M+10) = 3(D+10). Two equations, two variables - solvable. Since each statement alone is sufficient to find both ages, answer C is correct.

Multiple choice
  1. If statement I alone is sufficient but statement II alone is not sufficient.

  2. If statement II alone is sufficient but statement I alone is not sufficient.

  3. If each statement alone (either I or II) is sufficient.

  4. If statement I and II together are not sufficient.

  5. If both statements together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Statement I gives P:Q = 3:4 currently, so 4 years ago P-4:Q-4 could be anything. Statement II gives Q:R = 4:5, but introduces R (irrelevant to P:Q ratio). Even together, we don't know actual ages—only ratios. Without actual ages or sum, we cannot determine the ratio 4 years ago.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I > Quantity II

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  3. Quantity I < Quantity II

  4. Quantity I ≤ Quantity II

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or the relation cannot be established

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Quantity I: Ratio 7:5, sum 72. So 7x + 5x = 72, 12x = 72, x = 6. Amrit = 42, Amrita = 30. After 12 years: 42+12 = 54, 30+12 = 42. Total = 54+42 = 96. Quantity II: Class average 12.05 with 45 boys avg 11.75 and girls avg 12.5. Let g = number of girls. Total average = (45×11.75 + g×12.5)/(45+g) = 12.05. Solving: 528.75 + 12.5g = 542.25 + 12.05g. 0.45g = 13.5, g = 30. So 30 girls. Comparing: Quantity I = 96, Quantity II = 30. Therefore Quantity I > Quantity II.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I > Quantity II

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  3. Quantity II > Quantity I

  4. Quantity II ≥ Quantity I

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or Relation cannot be established

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

For Quantity I: Let son's age 6 years ago be x. Then Zenith's age was 4x. Currently, son is (x+6) and Zenith is thrice that, so 4x+6 = 3(x+6). Solving gives x=12, so son is 18 and Zenith is 54. For Quantity II: Marriage was 6+2=8 years ago. At marriage, ages were 17k and 15k. Now wife is 15k+8, son is 6. In 2 years, wife will be 15k+10 and son will be 8. Given (15k+10)/8 = 5/1, solving gives k=2, so Zeshan is now 34+8=42. Comparing: 54 > 42, so Quantity I is greater.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I < Quantity II

  2. Quantity I ≤ Quantity II

  3. Quantity I > Quantity II

  4. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or Relation cannot be establish

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Quantity I: 5 years ago, Rita:Priya = 5:2, so (R-5):(P-5) = 5:2. After 7 years from now, (R+7):(P+7) = 3:2. From first equation: 2(R-5) = 5(P-5), 2R-10 = 5P-25, 2R = 5P-15. From second: 2(R+7) = 3(P+7), 2R+14 = 3P+21, 2R = 3P+7. Equating: 5P-15 = 3P+7, 2P = 22, P = 11. So 2R = 3(11)+7 = 40, R = 20. Rita after 10 years = 20+10 = 30. Quantity II: Father = 2×Son. After 6 years: (F+6):(S+6) = 23:13. F = 2S, so (2S+6):(S+6) = 23:13. 13(2S+6) = 23(S+6), 26S+78 = 23S+138, 3S = 60, S = 20. Father = 2×20 = 40. Father after 6 years = 46. Since 30 < 46, Quantity I < Quantity II.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I > Quantity II

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  3. Quantity I < Quantity II

  4. Quantity I ≤ Quantity II

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or the relation cannot be established

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

For Quantity I: Let P=5x, Q=7x. Given (P-4)/(Q+10)=1/2, substituting gives (5x-4)/(7x+10)=1/2. Solving: 10x-8=7x+10, so x=6 and P=30. For Quantity II: Let P=5y, Q=8y. Given (P+7)/(Q+7)=2/3, substituting gives (5y+7)/(8y+7)=2/3. Solving: 15y+21=16y+14, so y=7 and P=35. Since 30 < 35, Quantity I is less than Quantity II.

Multiple choice
  1. Only II

  2. Only III

  3. Either I or II only

  4. Either II or III only

  5. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Statement I gives S = 2x (son's age x). Statement III gives (S+4)/(x+4) = 24/13, which with I becomes (2x+4)/(x+4) = 24/13, solvable for x. Statement II (Suchitra:mother = 2:3) is irrelevant to finding Suchitra's age alone. Only II can be dispensed with. The claimed answer A (Only II) is correct.

Multiple choice
  1. Quantity I > Quantity II

  2. Quantity I ≥ Quantity II

  3. Quantity II > Quantity I

  4. Quantity II ≥ Quantity I

  5. Quantity I = Quantity II or Relation cannot be established

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

First find present ages: average 28 means A + B + C = 84. From 7 years ago: ratio A:C = 1:4 gives C = 4A - 21. B-7 = 1.9(C-7) so B = 1.9C - 6.3. Substituting C in terms of A and solving: A + (1.9(4A - 21) - 6.3) + (4A - 21) = 84 gives A = 25, C = 79, B = 143... wait that doesn't work. Let me redo: C = 4A - 21, B = 1.9(4A - 21) - 6.3 + 7 = 1.9(4A - 28) + 0.7 = 7.6A - 52.6. Then A + (7.6A - 52.6) + (4A - 21) = 84 means 12.6A = 157.6, A = 12.5, C = 29, B = 42.5. Quantity I: after 8 years C = 37, present A = 12.5, percentage = 37/12.5 × 100 = 296%. Quantity II: after 8 years A = 20.5, present B = 42.5, percentage = 20.5/42.5 × 100 = 48.2%. So Quantity I > Quantity II.

Multiple choice
  1. Statement I alone is sufficient to answer the question

  2. Statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question

  3. Either Statement I or statement II is sufficient to answer the question

  4. Neither Statement I nor statement II is sufficient to answer the question

  5. Both Statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

From Statement II: 5 years ago, average age of A,B,C was 11, so their total age was 33. Current total age = 33 + 15 = 48. After 3 years, average of B and C will be 18, so B+C = 36 in 3 years. Currently, B+C = 30. Therefore A = 48 - 30 = 18 years. Statement II alone is sufficient. Statement I only gives ratios but no absolute values.

Multiple choice
  1. The data in statements I alone is sufficient to answer the question, while the data in statement II and II is not sufficient to answer the question.

  2. The data in statements II alone is sufficient to answer the question, while the data in statement II and III is not sufficient to answer the question.

  3. The data in statements I and II together or in statement III alone is sufficient to answer the question.

  4. The data in all the statements I, II and III is not sufficient to answer the question.

  5. The data in all the statements I, II and III together is necessary to answer the question.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

From I: Total age = 5 × 36 = 180 years. From II: A + B + E = 75. From III: E = D + 12. We have 5 variables (A,B,C,D,E) but only 3 equations: A+B+C+D+E=180, A+B+E=75, E=D+12. From A+B+E=75 and total=180, we get C+D=105. With E=D+12, we still can't find E's value uniquely without more information. Data is insufficient.