Reasoning

Statement Based Reasoning

280 Questions

Test your logical reasoning skills with these statement based questions covering assumptions and courses of action. You must critically analyze administrative decisions and implicit premises. These topics are a staple in the reasoning sections of IBPS banking, SSC, and government recruitment exams.

Courses of actionImplicit assumptionsLogical reasoningStatement analysisAdministrative decisions

Statement Based Reasoning Questions

Multiple choice technology
  1. Impact, priority and urgency are independent of each other

  2. Urgency should be based on impact and priority

  3. Impact should be based on urgency and priority

  4. Priority should be based on impact and urgency

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Priority is determined by combining impact and urgency. Impact measures the extent of business effect, urgency measures how quickly resolution is needed, and priority is the calculated category that drives response. Priority = Impact + Urgency - this is the standard ITIL formula for incident prioritization.

Multiple choice
  1. In 1999, the Syndicate's president took a personal interest in the passage of the proposal, while in 2001 the effort was left in the hands of the members of the syndicate.

  2. There was an election in 2000 in which two council members who favored the proposal did not get re-elected to the council and no one who favored the proposal was newly elected.

  3. There was an election in 1999 in which a director who did not favor the proposal was re-elected and the faculty ad hoc committee lost one or its members.

  4. In 2000, a group of directors, not on the syndicate, petitioned extensively to convince the syndicate to oppose the proposal.

  5. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

This would account for a change in the composition of the syndicate, and so for the change in the vote, without any individual director changing the way he or she voted.

Multiple choice
  1. Many employment opportunities in the South result from newly built retirement communities.

  2. People less than 70 year old made up less than 10 percent of retirees in 1980 but today account for over 40 percent of retirees.

  3. The segment of the population over 60 years old has increased by two-thirds in the last 20 years, while the entire population has increased by only one-half.

  4. The average cost of living in the South is significantly lower than it is in the North.

  5. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The question concerns the claim that the population now has a greater life expectancy. This answer choice states that the segment of the population over 60 years old is growing at a faster rate than the population as a whole; so more people must be living longer.

Multiple choice
  1. (i) and (ii)

  2. (ii) and (iii)

  3. (i) and (iii)

  4. All of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act, a dying declaration requires only that the statement relates to the cause of death or circumstances of the transaction resulting in death. The declarant's expectation of death at the time of making the statement is NOT an essential requirement under Indian law, though it is often present in practice. What matters is that the statement concerns the cause/circumstances and the maker is now dead (making it a hearsay exception).

Multiple choice
  1. Both the statements are individually true and Statement – II is the correct explanation of Statement – I.

  2. Both the statements are individually true, but Statement – II is not the correct explanation of Statement – I.

  3. Statement – I is true, but Statement – II is false.

  4. Statement – I is false, but Statement – II is true.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

A peremptory norm (also called Jus Cogens, Latin for "compelling law") is a fundamental principle of international law which is accepted by the international community of states as a norm from which no derogation is ever permitted. States can deviate from customary international law by enacting treaties and conflicting laws, but Jus Cogens are non-derogable. 

Multiple choice
  1. if statements A alone is adequate to arrive at the conclusion.

  2. if statement B alone is adequate to arrive at the conclusion.

  3. if both statements A and B are required to arrive at the conclusion.

  4. if both statements are insufficient to draw the conclusion.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Printed matter is a small fraction of the colours that we encounter in the world.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

I is too sweeping an assumption.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Neither assumption is implicit in the statement. The statement claims that economic prosperity automatically leads to population limitation, but it makes no claim about poor people's attitudes toward population control (Assumption I) or about time availability for family activities (Assumption II). These are external ideas not connected to the given statement.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The statement 'Rakesh is a person of few words' directly implies that he exercises control over his speech, which validates Assumption II. However, the statement only gives general advice about controlling temper and doesn't provide any specific information about Rakesh's temperamental behavior. Therefore, Assumption I is not implicit in the given statement.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The statement states that 'war begins in the minds of men,' which directly implies that individuals are responsible for initiating wars - validating Assumption I. The second part about building 'defence against war' in minds suggests that current thinking needs correction, which supports Assumption II that wars occur because people's thinking is misguided. Both assumptions are logically embedded in the statement.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Assumption I is not implicit because the statement says happiness is shared, not that unhappy people share sufferings. Assumption II is not implicit because suffering is not exclusively tied to happiness levels in the text. Thus, neither assumption follows logically.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

I can be directly inferred. II is irrelevant.

Multiple choice
  1. Strongly confirms

  2. Vaguely hints

  3. Contradicts

  4. Irrelevant

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Here is an example of a professor with tenure, who really works very hard.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The volume may decrease, but not proportionately.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The statement mentions treating addicts by 're-establishing their lost ties' and requiring 'continuous personal attention.' This directly implies that addiction and strained relationships are connected (Assumption II) and that addicts respond better to personal attention (Assumption I). Both assumptions are necessary for the treatment approach described to make sense.