Reasoning

Statement Based Reasoning

216 Questions

Test your logical reasoning skills with these statement based questions covering assumptions and courses of action. You must critically analyze administrative decisions and implicit premises. These topics are a staple in the reasoning sections of IBPS banking, SSC, and government recruitment exams.

Courses of actionImplicit assumptionsLogical reasoningStatement analysisAdministrative decisions

Statement Based Reasoning Questions

Multiple choice technology
  1. Impact, priority and urgency are independent of each other

  2. Urgency should be based on impact and priority

  3. Impact should be based on urgency and priority

  4. Priority should be based on impact and urgency

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

In ITIL incident management, priority is determined by combining two factors: impact (how widespread the incident is on business operations) and urgency (how quickly the incident needs to be resolved). Priority is therefore derived FROM impact and urgency, not the other way around. Impact and urgency are the inputs, priority is the calculated output.

Multiple choice technology
  1. Impact, priority and urgency are independent of each other

  2. Urgency should be based on impact and priority

  3. Impact should be based on urgency and priority

  4. Priority should be based on impact and urgency

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Priority is determined by combining impact and urgency. Impact measures the extent of business effect, urgency measures how quickly resolution is needed, and priority is the calculated category that drives response. Priority = Impact + Urgency - this is the standard ITIL formula for incident prioritization.

Multiple choice
  1. (i) and (ii)

  2. (ii) and (iii)

  3. (i) and (iii)

  4. All of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act, a dying declaration requires only that the statement relates to the cause of death or circumstances of the transaction resulting in death. The declarant's expectation of death at the time of making the statement is NOT an essential requirement under Indian law, though it is often present in practice. What matters is that the statement concerns the cause/circumstances and the maker is now dead (making it a hearsay exception).

Multiple choice
  1. Both the statements are individually true and Statement – II is the correct explanation of Statement – I.

  2. Both the statements are individually true, but Statement – II is not the correct explanation of Statement – I.

  3. Statement – I is true, but Statement – II is false.

  4. Statement – I is false, but Statement – II is true.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

A peremptory norm (also called Jus Cogens, Latin for "compelling law") is a fundamental principle of international law which is accepted by the international community of states as a norm from which no derogation is ever permitted. States can deviate from customary international law by enacting treaties and conflicting laws, but Jus Cogens are non-derogable. 

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

I is too sweeping an assumption.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Neither assumption is implicit in the statement. The statement claims that economic prosperity automatically leads to population limitation, but it makes no claim about poor people's attitudes toward population control (Assumption I) or about time availability for family activities (Assumption II). These are external ideas not connected to the given statement.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The statement 'Rakesh is a person of few words' directly implies that he exercises control over his speech, which validates Assumption II. However, the statement only gives general advice about controlling temper and doesn't provide any specific information about Rakesh's temperamental behavior. Therefore, Assumption I is not implicit in the given statement.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The statement states that 'war begins in the minds of men,' which directly implies that individuals are responsible for initiating wars - validating Assumption I. The second part about building 'defence against war' in minds suggests that current thinking needs correction, which supports Assumption II that wars occur because people's thinking is misguided. Both assumptions are logically embedded in the statement.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

I can be directly inferred. II is irrelevant.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The volume may decrease, but not proportionately.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The statement mentions treating addicts by 're-establishing their lost ties' and requiring 'continuous personal attention.' This directly implies that addiction and strained relationships are connected (Assumption II) and that addicts respond better to personal attention (Assumption I). Both assumptions are necessary for the treatment approach described to make sense.

Multiple choice
  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The statement claims water pollution will make oxygen unavailable to water plants. For this to happen, pollution must affect plant growth (Assumption I) by reducing oxygen availability (Assumption II). Both assumptions are necessary for the consequence described - plants need oxygen, and if pollution makes it unavailable, both the effect on plants and the reduction of oxygen are implicit.

Multiple choice
  1. if only Course of action I follows.

  2. if only Course of action II follows.

  3. if either Course of action I or Course of action II follows.

  4. if neither Course of action I nor Course of action II follows.

  5. if both courses of action I and II follow.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

Declaring them endangered and at the same time creating groups or individual bodies will help in protecting the species.

Multiple choice
  1. if only Course of action I follows.

  2. if only Course of action II follows.

  3. if either Course of action I or Course of action II follows.

  4. if neither Course of action I nor Course of action II follows.

  5. if both courses of action I and II follow.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Restricting the number of companies may not be a wise action. It in fact may lead to monopoly in the market that further may lead to adverse outcomes.