Law Legal Studies · General Awareness
Indian Law and Jurisprudence
1,379 Questions
Indian law and jurisprudence cover statutory frameworks like the Companies Act, Consumer Protection Act, and Indian Penal Code, alongside landmark judicial precedents. Legal topics are crucial for law entrance exams, judiciary examinations, and general awareness papers. Answer these questions to learn about defamation, administrative tribunals, and criminal procedure code sections.
IPC and defamation lawsAdministrative Tribunals ActConsumer Protection ActCriminal Procedure Code sectionsArbitration and Conciliation ActMental Health Act provisions
Indian Law and Jurisprudence Questions
-
Harindara Singh v/s Punjab State Warehousing Corporation 2010 II LLJ SC
-
Surendara Kumar Verma v/s Central Govt. Indl. Tribunal 1981 ILLJ SC
-
Management W.B. India Ltd v/s Jagannath AIR 1974 SC
-
Pioneer Ltd v/s Tajdar Hussain AIR 1974 SC
B
Correct answer
Explanation
(2) In Surendara Kumar Verma v/s Central Govt. Indl. Tribunal, Supreme Court held that when retrenchment of a workmen is invalid, reinstatement can be ordered.
-
admissibility of facts
-
relevancy of facts
-
relevancy of opinions
-
legal presumptions
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Under Section 114 of Evidence Act, the court may presume the existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have happened.
-
Section 45 of Evidence Act
-
Section 46 of Evidence Act
-
Both (1) and (2)
-
None of these
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Opinion of experts is relevant under Section 45 of Evidence Act.
-
proceedings before tribunals
-
affidavits presented to any court or officer
-
proceedings before an arbitrator
-
None of these
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Section 1 of Indian Evidence Act expressly provides that the act is not applicable to affidavits presented to any court or proceedings before an arbitrator.
-
Magistrate
-
Police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector
-
Any person
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Test Identification Parade can be taken by any person whom the court authorises by police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector and by the court itself.
-
three years or of fine not exceeding five thousand rupees or of both
-
five years or of fine not exceeding ten thousand rupees or of both
-
seven years or of fine which may extend to any amount or both
-
seven years or of fine not exceeding one lakh rupees or of both
C
Correct answer
Explanation
Option (1) is incorrect: No such provision under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Option (2) is incorrect: No such provision under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Option (3) is correct: Section 29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure says that the court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate may pass any sentence authorised by law, except a sentence of death or of imprisonment for life or of imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years.
Option (4) is incorrect: No such provision under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
-
Not voidable
-
Voidable
-
Void
-
Not void
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Option (1) is correct: Under Section 21 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract is not voidable because it was caused by a mistake as to any law in force in India, but a mistake as to a law not in force in India has the same effect as a mistake of fact.
-
General Manager of the railway
-
Secretary to the Central Government
-
Collector of the district
-
Union of India
-
Any of the above
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Option (1) is correct: In case of a suit against the Central Government where it relates to a railway, no suit shall be instituted under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure until the expiration of two months next after the notice in writing has been delivered to or left at the office of the General Manager of that railway.
Option (2) is incorrect: In case of a suit against the Central Government, except where it relates to a railway, no suit shall be instituted under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure until the expiration of two months next after the notice in writing has been delivered to or left at the office of a Secretary to that Government.
Option (3) is incorrect: In case of a suit against a State Government, no suit shall be instituted under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure until the expiration of two months next after the notice in writing has been delivered to or left at the office of a Secretary to that Government or the Collector of the district.
Option (4) is incorrect: No such provision
-
appeals
-
revisions
-
applications
-
None of these
B
Correct answer
Explanation
Option (1) is incorrect: Provisions of Section 5 (Extension of prescribed period) are applicable to appeals.
Option (2) is correct: Starting words of Section 5 states that provisions of this section are applicable only to appeal or any application other than an application under any of the provisions of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Option (3) is incorrect: Provisions of Section 5 (Extension of prescribed period) are applicable to applications.
Option (4) is incorrect: Option (2) is correct.
-
compoundable
-
non-compoundable
-
cognizable
-
Both (2) and (3)
A
Correct answer
Explanation
(1) Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 deals with offences to be compoundable.
-
Section 11
-
Section 12
-
Section 13
-
Section 14
B
Correct answer
Explanation
Option (1) is incorrect: Section 11 of Specific Relief Act deals with cases in which specific performance of contracts is connected with trust enforceable.
Option (2) is correct: Section 12 of Specific Relief Act deals with specific performance of part of contract.
Option (3) is incorrect: Section 13 of Specific Relief Act deals with rights of purchaser or lessee against person with no title or imperfect title.
Option (4) is incorrect: Section 14 of Specific Relief Act deals with contracts not specifically enforceable.
-
the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 only
-
the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 only
-
Either (1) or (2)
-
Both (1) and (2)
A
Correct answer
Explanation
(1) The Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was enacted to deal specifically with accidents arising out of the use of motor vehicles.
-
Driving of vehicle
-
On a public way
-
Such driving must be so rash or negligent as to endanger human life
-
Persons were on road
-
None of these
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Option (4) is correct: Whoever drives any vehicle or rides on any public way in a manner so rash or negligent as to endanger human life or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person, shall be liable to be punished.
-
declaratory decrees
-
mandatory injunction
-
rectification of instruments
-
rescission of contracts
C
Correct answer
Explanation
Option (1) is incorrect: Chapter VI of the Specific Relief Act deals with declaratory decrees.
Option (2) is incorrect: Provisions for mandatory injunctions are provided u/s 39.
Option (3) is correct: Section 26 of Specific Relief Act provides when instruments may be rectified.
Option (4) is incorrect: Provisions for rescission of contracts are provided u/s 27.
-
cyberstalking
-
email bombing
-
child pornography
-
cyberterrorism
D
Correct answer
Explanation
(4) Section 66F of the IT Act deals with cyberterrorism.