Fundamental and Human Rights

The 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978 removed the right to property from the list of Fundamental Rights (Article 19(1)(f)) and reclassified it as a legal right under Article 300A. This was done to reduce the number of Fundamental Rights and prevent property-related litigation from hampering land reforms. The other amendments listed did not deal with this specific change.

The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 gave precedence to Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) over Fundamental Rights. Article 31C was amended to provide that any law giving effect to DPSP in Article 39(b)(c) could not be declared void for violating Fundamental Rights. This controversial provision was later modified by the 44th Amendment. The other amendments did not establish this precedence.

Contempt of court is a reasonable restriction on the right to freedom (Article 19) as it protects the authority and dignity of the judiciary. Article 19(2) specifically lists contempt of court as one of the grounds on which freedom of speech and expression can be restricted. It does not primarily restrict equality, religious freedom, or constitutional remedies.

The Right to Property was removed from Fundamental Rights by the 44th Constitutional Amendment (1978) and is now a legal right under Article 300A. This means citizens can still approach courts for property violations, but it's no longer a fundamental right.

The right to vote comes with the responsibility to vote wisely. Voting based on caste/religion or wealth undermines democracy. The ethical choice is to vote for merit - choosing an intelligent candidate without discrimination strengthens democratic institutions.

Article 23 of the Constitution prohibits forced labour, child labour, and trafficking. These are core protections against exploitation. Options A, B, and D relate to other rights (equality, legal protection, and minority rights) but not exploitation specifically.

Fundamental Rights serve as a check on the 'tyranny of the majority' by protecting individual and minority rights against democratic excesses. They are not absolute (reasonable restrictions can be imposed) and their primary purpose is to safeguard individual liberty and dignity. Option C correctly captures their role as constraints on majority power.

The primary objective of Fundamental Rights is to ensure individual liberty by protecting citizens from arbitrary state action. While they support democratic government and judicial independence, their core purpose is safeguarding personal freedoms. Option B correctly identifies individual liberty as the central concern.

The Right to Work is a Directive Principle of State Policy (Article 41), not a Fundamental Right. Fundamental Rights include Right to Equality, Freedom, against Exploitation, Religion, and Constitutional Remedies. Directive Principles are not enforceable in court but guide governance.

The Right to Property ceased to be a Fundamental Right through the 44th Constitutional Amendment (1978) and was reclassified as a legal right under Article 300-A. This change was made to facilitate land reforms and redistribution, as Fundamental Rights cannot be easily amended for public welfare purposes.

Economic justice is mentioned in both the Preamble (social, economic and political justice) and the Directive Principles of State Policy (Articles 38-43). While Fundamental Rights ensure civil liberties, Economic Justice is not explicitly enumerated as a Fundamental Right but is a directive goal for the state.

The Right to Property was removed from Fundamental Rights by the 44th Constitutional Amendment (1978) and reclassified as a legal right under Article 300A. Right to life (Article 21), Right to equality (Articles 14-18), and Freedom of speech (Article 19) remain fundamental rights.

Article 32 is the right to constitutional remedies, allowing citizens to move the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. Dr. Ambedkar called it the 'heart and soul of the Constitution.' Article 19 deals with specific freedoms, Article 34 with martial law, and Article 32 is the correct remedy.