Civics Polity · General Awareness
Constitutions and Law
2,792 Questions
Constitutions and Law questions cover fundamental rights, the preamble, critical articles, and amendments from the Indian and United States constitutions. This topic is indispensable for UPSC, state PSC, and SSC exams. Practicing these questions ensures a solid understanding of political frameworks and legal provisions.
Indian Constitution articlesFundamental rights and dutiesConstitutional amendmentsPreamble featuresUS Constitution principles
Constitutions and Law Questions
-
Schizophrenia
-
Epilepsy
-
Impotency
-
Concealment of pre-marriage pregnancy
-
All of the above
B
Correct answer
Explanation
Epilepsy is a group of neurological diseases. The word “epilepsy” has been removed by the 2009 amendment for declaring the marriage void. So, now there exists no ground for declaring a marriage void that a party is suffering from recurrent attacks of insanity.
-
Constituent Assembly
-
Indian Parliament
-
Union Cabinet
-
None of these
D
Correct answer
Explanation
It was adopted and enacted by the ‘People of India’.
-
(1) and (2)
-
(1) and (3)
-
(2) and (3)
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
All the given features are greatly influenced by the Government of India Act, 1935.
-
Judicial Review – British Constitution
-
Concurrent List – Australian Constitution
-
Directive Principles – Irish Constitution
-
Fundamental Rights – US Constitution
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The question asks for the WRONGLY matched pair. Judicial Review was actually borrowed from the US Constitution (Marbury v. Madison case), not the British Constitution. The UK follows parliamentary sovereignty and lacks formal judicial review of constitutional validity. The other matches are correct: Concurrent List from Australian Constitution, Directive Principles from Irish Constitution, and Fundamental Rights from US Constitution.
-
It is not enforceable in a court of law.
-
The Supreme Court has ruled out that it is not a part of the Constitution.
-
It has been amended twice.
-
All of the above
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The Preamble is non-justiciable and not enforceable in courts (Option A is correct). However, Option B is wrong - the Supreme Court has ruled that the Preamble IS part of the Constitution (Kesavananda Bharati case). Option C is also incorrect - the Preamble has been amended only once (42nd Amendment, 1976) to add 'socialist', 'secular', and 'integrity'. Option D 'All of these' cannot be correct when B and C are wrong.
-
Golaknath Case
-
Berubari Case
-
Kesavananda Bharati Case
-
Minerva Mills Case
B
Correct answer
Explanation
In the Berubari Union case (1960), the Supreme Court initially ruled that the Preamble was not part of the Constitution. This view was later overturned in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), where the Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution. Golaknath dealt with fundamental rights and amendment power, while Minerva Mills dealt with judicial review of constitutional amendments.
-
Only (B), (C) and (D)
-
Only (A) and (B)
-
Only (A), (B) and (C)
-
All of these
D
Correct answer
Explanation
The Preamble reveals: (A) when enacted (November 26, 1949), (B) ideals to achieve (justice, liberty, equality, fraternity), (C) system of government (democratic, republic), and (D) source of authority (We the People of India). All four elements emerge clearly from the Preamble text. It is a comprehensive declaration of the Constitution's philosophy, source, and basic features.
-
in the Preamble
-
in part III of the Indian Constitution
-
in part IV of the Indian Constitution
-
nowhere specifically
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The Preamble contains the basic aims and objectives of the Indian Constitution - justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. It is the philosophy and soul of the Constitution. Part III contains Fundamental Rights (justiciable), Part IV contains Directive Principles (non-justiciable guidelines). The Preamble stands apart as the ideological foundation, explaining the Constitution's purpose.
-
Election Commission
-
Finance Commission
-
Planning Commission
-
UPSC
C
Correct answer
Explanation
Constitutional bodies are established by the Constitution itself. The Planning Commission (now NITI Aayog) was created by an executive resolution and is NOT mentioned in the Constitution. Election Commission, Finance Commission, and UPSC are all explicitly established by constitutional provisions.
-
The Finance Commission of India came into existence in 1950.
-
It is established under Article 280 of the Indian Constitution.
-
It is established by the President of India.
-
As per the Constitution, the commission is appointed every five years and consists of a chairman and four other members.
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The Finance Commission of India came into existence in 1951.
-
The Directive Principles are non-justiciable in nature.
-
They act as a check on the government.
-
Article 31-C, inserted by the 25th Amendment Act of 1971, seeks to upgrade the Directive Principles.
-
All of these statements are correct.
D
Correct answer
Explanation
All three statements about Directive Principles are correct: they are non-justiciable, they act as a check on government, and Article 31-C did seek to upgrade DPSPs (though this was partially struck down by the Supreme Court). Therefore, 'All of these statements are correct' is the right answer.
-
The US Constitution
-
The Russian Constitution
-
The Weimar Constitution of Germany
-
The Constitution of Ireland
B
Correct answer
Explanation
Fundamental Duties were added to the Indian Constitution by the 42nd Amendment Act in 1976, drawing inspiration from the Russian Constitution (then USSR). They are enumerated in Article 51A. The US Constitution influenced the Fundamental Rights, not duties. The Weimar Constitution influenced emergency provisions, and Ireland influenced the Directive Principles.
-
simple majority
-
absolute majority
-
special majority
-
special majority along with approval by one-third of the states
C
Correct answer
Explanation
Changes in Directive Principles require a Constitutional amendment, which has to be passed by a special majority of both houses of the Parliament. This means that an amendment requires the approval of two-thirds of the members present and voting.
-
Article 44
-
Article 48
-
Article 50
-
Article 51
C
Correct answer
Explanation
The correct option is (3).
-
Article 44
-
Article 50
-
Article 47
-
Article 48
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Option 1 is the correct answer.