To answer this question, let's go through each option to understand why it is correct or incorrect:
Option A) To identify potential application failures by use of a test specification - This option is incorrect because while reviewing a software deliverable, the main objective is not specifically to identify potential application failures. Although identifying potential application failures can be part of the review process, it is not the main objective.
Option B) To identify defects in any software work product - This option is correct because when reviewing a software deliverable, the main objective is to identify defects or issues in any software work product. This includes identifying bugs, errors, or any other problems that may exist in the deliverable.
Option C) To identify spelling mistakes in a requirements specification - This option is incorrect because reviewing a software deliverable focuses on the software work product itself, not the requirements specification. While it is important to have accurate and clear requirements, the main objective of reviewing a software deliverable is not specifically to identify spelling mistakes in the requirements specification.
Option D) To identify standards inconsistencies in the code - This option is incorrect because while reviewing a software deliverable, it is important to ensure that the code follows established standards and guidelines. However, the main objective is not specifically to identify standards inconsistencies in the code. The main objective is to identify defects or issues in any software work product.
The correct answer is B) To identify defects in any software work product. This option is correct because when reviewing a software deliverable, the main objective is to identify defects or issues in any software work product. This includes identifying bugs, errors, or any other problems that may exist in the deliverable.