To answer this question, let's go through each option to understand why it is correct or incorrect:
Option A) Eliminate some of the requirements that have not yet been implemented - This option is correct because by eliminating some of the requirements that have not yet been implemented, the project can save time and focus on completing the essential requirements. This can help bring the project back on schedule without compromising on the quality standards established for the product.
Option B) Add more engineers to the project to make up for lost work - This option is incorrect because adding more engineers to the project may increase productivity in the short term, but it may also lead to issues such as communication gaps, coordination challenges, and increased complexity. Additionally, it may not address the underlying reasons for the delay.
Option C) Ask the current developers to work overtime until the lost work is recovered - This option is incorrect because asking the current developers to work overtime may lead to burnout, decreased productivity, and potential quality issues. Overtime work should be used sparingly and only as a short-term solution.
Option D) Hire more software quality assurance personnel - This option is incorrect because hiring more software quality assurance personnel may help improve the quality of the product, but it will not directly address the delay in the implementation phase.
The correct answer is A) Eliminate some of the requirements that have not yet been implemented. This option is correct because it allows the project to prioritize essential requirements and save time, bringing the project back on schedule without compromising on quality standards.