Could reviews or inspections be considered part of testing:
-
No, because they are normally applied before testing
-
No, because they do not apply to the test documentation
-
Yes, because both help detect faults and improve quality
-
Yes, because testing includes all non-constructive activities
Reviews and inspections ARE considered part of testing in the broad sense - they detect defects and improve quality before dynamic testing begins. Option A is wrong because being 'before testing' doesn't exclude them from being testing activities. Option B is incorrect - reviews do apply to test documentation. Option D overgeneralizes. Option C correctly states both help detect faults and improve quality.
Reviews and inspections are static testing techniques — they examine documents, code, or designs without executing them, but they share testing's core goal of finding defects early and improving overall quality. Because of this shared purpose, most testing standards (like ISTQB) classify reviews as a form of testing rather than excluding them just because they precede dynamic test execution.