To answer this question, let's go through each statement to understand why it is correct or incorrect:
Statement (i) - "An incident may be closed without being fixed." - This statement is true. Sometimes, an incident may be closed without actually fixing the problem. This could happen if the incident is determined to be a duplicate, if it is not reproducible, or if it is deemed to be a low priority issue.
Statement (ii) - "Incidents may not be raised against documentation." - This statement is false. Incidents can be raised against documentation if there are errors, omissions, or ambiguities in the documentation that need to be addressed.
Statement (iii) - "The final stage of incident tracking is fixing." - This statement is false. The final stage of incident tracking is not necessarily fixing the issue. The final stage typically involves verifying the fix, closing the incident, and documenting the resolution.
Statement (iv) - "The incident record does not include information on test environments." - This statement is true. The incident record typically includes information about the incident itself (description, steps to reproduce, etc.), but it may not include specific details about the test environment in which the incident occurred.
Statement (v) - "Incidents should be raised when someone other than the author of the software performs the test." - This statement is true. It is often beneficial to have different individuals involved in testing the software to identify potential issues and provide different perspectives.
Based on the above analysis, we can determine that statements (i) and (v) are true, while statements (ii), (iii), and (iv) are false.
Therefore, the correct answer is B.