Tag: english

Here, we can see that the author does not approve of tolerance and so he believes that this solution is less thrilling compared to the Nazi solution. This answer can be picked up from the last lines of the passage:  "The other way is much less thrilling, but it is, on the whole, the way of the democracies, and I prefer it. If you don't like people, put up with them as well as you can. Don't try to love them: you can't, you'll only strain yourself. But try to tolerate them." So, option B is the best answer.

Here, "appallingly" is used as an intensifier which means in large amounts. Literally, 'appallingly' means 'in a terrible manner'. However, in the given context, the author uses 'appallingly' to refer to large numbers in a negative way so, the correct answer is option  B.

In the given passage, the author states that it is very important to save the nature and he calls man's effort in the same direction, a struggle. The line, "...natural reserves are now being carved out to avert the danger of destroying nature completely. Man will perish without nature, so modern man should continue this struggle to save plants,..." supports the above conclusion. So, option B is the correct answer.

"The other way is much less thrilling, but it is, on the whole, the way of the democracies, and I prefer it." This statement from the passage indicates that the author is not a Nazi as he prefers to opt for the democratic solution in the given situation. So, B is the best answer.

Here, "I could not see what there was to make a fuss about" is an example of the typical English trait: being practical. "But in me, the Englishman came out strong" precedes this illustration of typical English character. So, in this context, we can conclude that the answer to the question asked here is option B.

The given answer, option B, is correct. The writer of the passage stresses on the fact that as humans, we have continuously destroyed nature for our betterment, urbanization and modernity. He laments over the fact that in doing so, we are endangering our future, reminding us that we need nature more than it needs us, and for that, we must be vigilant not to destroy nature. The statements of options A,C and D are incoherent with the passage and thus, are incorrect. 

The statement of option A, countryside covered with plants and trees, is correct. The passage suggests the destruction of landscape, trees and natural reserves being destroyed for the rampant urbanization that the humans have undertaken. This is the "nature" that the passage talks about. The statements of options B,C and D are irrelevant in this context, and thus, are incorrect. 

"A beautiful landscape, full of green vegetation" is proof positive that life will continue on Earth, it will preserve our life by providing us with food, oxygen, etc. So, we can conclude that a beautiful landscape will fill us with satisfaction because it ensures our future existence. So, the answer is option C.

The given sentence simply means that if you take a fish out of its natural habitat, that is, water then it will die- a fish cannot survive on land. Option C is the answer.

Only option A conveys the correct meaning of there being a water shortage: we barely have enough water. So, option A is the correct answer. B simply contradicts the given sentence, C cannot be the answer as A and B contradict each other and D is not the answer. So, A is the best answer.