Reading Comprehension Questions

Multiple choice
  1. Wow!

  2. Rubbing salt into the wounds!

  3. Squaring a problem does not halve it!

  4. Such a vicious irony!

  5. Ever heard of it?

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

(1): Incorrect. Wow is used as an expression of praise or pleasant surprise. (2): Incorrect. The argument is about 'addressing the injury' by doing more of the same, not rubbing of salt or exacerbating the injury. (3): Incorrect. Creating more exceptions does not necessarily square the problems. (4): Correct. An irony is implied when the cause and cure are caused by the same instrument. In this case, remedy being worse than the malady which it is supposed to cure, creates the irony. (5): Incorrect. The phrase is used to imply something outrageously bizarre.

Multiple choice
  1. The rate of inflation during the present regime has decreased. At present it is 3% while earlier it was 11%.

  2. The salaries of defense personnel have stayed almost the same over the years.

  3. The present regime has seen some increase in defense spending every year.

  4. The present government has introduced several economy measures for the Armed Forces, including a cut in arms requirements.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

(1): Correct. The principal logic of the author is since the stated amount of increase is lesser this time, the present regime is not spending enough. But in the process, inflation rate, another significant consideration, which will decide the effective increase, which has been given a go-bye. Herein lies the crux of the problem. (2): Incorrect. The salaries of defense personnel remaining the same, contributes only partially to negate the idea. Salaries might form only a small component of defense spending. (3): Incorrect. 'Some increase' (5%) only supports the argument. (4): Incorrect. (D) only serves to support the logic given in the question, while in fact, we are supposed to negate it. (5): Incorrect. (5), at the most, is big political rhetoric, which is pretty general and does not make any specific reference to the question in hand.

Multiple choice

Which of the following is a major problem in uncovering the genetic basis of autism in terms of the conventional approach?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations - novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements. Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families - 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.

  1. Too many chromosomes are responsible for it.

  2. There is great, complex interaction among different chromosomes responsible for autism, which is not amenable to studies.

  3. There is no clarity as to which chromosome is responsible for autism.

  4. Not enough subjects are available for studies.

  5. It is difficult to determine the role of spontaniety.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Options (1) and (2) run contrary to what is given in the passage. Thus, they are not justified. There is nothing said about the subjects available for study even, thereby ruling out option (4). Nor is spontaniety a consideration here. Refer to the last lines of paragraph 2 for the correct answer: “The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.”

Multiple choice

Which of the following is most nearly CORRECT in he context of the above passage?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations - novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements. Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families - 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.

  1. High risk families often have a male carrying a sporadic mutation leading to autism.

  2. An individual having a functional disruption in a single gene, because the other copy has been deleted, is a very common occurrence.

  3. The unified genetic theory of autism combines elements from two different theories and gives an integrated picture.

  4. In case of families with multiple affected members, the males have a greater risk of being autistic as compared to females.

  5. Families with three or more children are at greater risk of having an autistic child.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Option (1) is wrong as it is the females that have a greater chance of getting the disease in such cases, according to the passage. Option (2) is again unjustified in that the total number of such cases does not exceed 10 percent, which does account for the phrase, a very common occurrence in the option. Option (3) runs contrary to the passage, as Wigler has only given one theory incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous factors. So there are no theories here. Option (5) makes too sweeping a statement. “He found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder”. Hence, option (4) is the best one.

Multiple choice
  1. they are well versed with Christian sermons and preach them ardently

  2. they are the proclaimed 'sons of God'

  3. they propagate spiritualism

  4. they are learned enough to preach the Gospel of Christ

  5. theirs is a life of pursuit, not gains

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

Option (1): It is mentioned in the first paragraph of the passage that people who are well versed with Christian sermons and who preach them ardently are sitting at the father's table. Option (2): 'Sons of' is not a characteristic, but an outcome of a characteristic pursuit. Also, 'proclaimed' makes it something of a status that can be linked with the clergy only. Thus, the option is eliminated. Option (3): “Leaders seated at the father's table” officially propagates spiritualism. Thus, the option is eliminated. Option (4): “Leaders seated at the father's table” are learned enough to preach. Thus, the option is eliminated. Option (5): “Leaders seated at the father's table” does not satisfy “the starved souls who can get satisfaction (only) from God Himself”. Thus, the option is the correct answer.

Multiple choice

Which of the following purposes is served by the first paragraph in relation to the passage as a whole?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations - novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements. Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families - 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.

  1. It sums up a major point of discussion, which is being explained by the rest of the passage.

  2. It sums up a major point of discussion, with the rest of the passage trying to explain why the efforts to decode autism have been unsuccessful.

  3. It discusses Wigler’s work and how it has been instrumental in accounting for genetic basis of autism.

  4. It highlights a major point i.e. females carry autism more frequently and the rest of the passages discusses the reasons for it.

  5. It highlights a major unanswered question in autism research and the rest of the passage is again silent on it.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The failure of efforts to decode the genetic basis of autism is only one of the many points being made by the writer. Hence option (2) is definitely wrong here. The opening paragraph does talk about Wigler’s work but nowhere does it suggest that his work has been instrumental in this regard. Rather, it has got mixed results; there is nothing conclusive or final in this regard. Hence, option (3) is not justified here. Option (4) goes contrary to the contents of the first paragraph, which says that it is much commoner among males rather than in females. There is no question given in the first paragraph at all. So option (5) is wrong ab initio. Hence, option (1) is the best possible under given circumstances.

Multiple choice

The primary purpose of the passage is to

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

A very interesting legal, moral and ethical war is being fought in the corridors of power in California these days. Californians, along with the rest of the Americans are going to the midterm electoral voting and apart from electing representatives to the Houses of government, they alone will also be voting on something called Article-19 which is basically a public referendum on the legalization of the home growing and self-consumption of Cannabis. The slugfest isn’t likely to be one-sided or even pretty with the proponents on both sides of the clearly demarcated raging line of fire invoking anything and everything to bolster their point of view. God, freedom of choice, disempowerment of the drug cartels, a steroidal kick start to the rapidly sinking economy, innate prejudices and just plain old  and countless other factors make this issue a melting pot that is the mother of all disagreements.

At the heart of the matter is perhaps the fact that America remains deep down a very conservative nation, irrespective of its postulations and reputation to the contrary and something that has been a part of the lifestyle for so long will take some beating to get rid of. Opponents of the Article cite the societal, financial and health damage caused by the legalized drugs like tobacco and alcohol whereas the rooters for the drug affectionately called Mary Jane cite the same reasons, with no dearth of logic, in favor of the legalization of what is easily the most used drug in the world. They say that legalizing the drug’s home cultivation and consumption, while keeping in place the laws on the sale of the same, will dismember the ability of the Mexican drug cartels to buy more guns and goons to further their nefarious designs and also that doing away with the criminalization of the drug will ensure that the government will earn a lot in revenue as taxes from Cannabis growers. They also point towards research that suggests that Pot perhaps isn’t as harmful to the human body as the other legalized drugs which rake in millions of dollars every year for the government in tax money. After all, wasn’t the prohibition during the thirties more harmful than good and didn’t lifting it lead to the demise of the clout of the bootleggers? What is surprising is the fact that cannabis was legal in California up until seven decades ago and that in itself gives strength to the voices of those who are championing for giving the drug an above the board status. They cite evidence showing that prisons are overcrowded, justice and police departments overworked and trials delayed due to the intransigence of the federal government in waking up to the fact that freeing the authorities of looking out for these petty misdemeanors will allow them to work at catching real criminals while letting the peaceniks have a drag.

  1. present a radical idea and its vulnerabilities

  2. describe a situation and its potential repercussions

  3. propose a temporary solution to a problem

  4. analyze a frequent source of disagreement

  5. explore the implications of a suggestion

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

(1) Incorrect; the idea is radical, but the passage focuses more on its strengths. (2): Incorrect; the passage describes a stand-off and veers towards the benefits of change. (3): Incorrect; the passage reports both sides with a bias towards the ones advocating legalizing of cannabis. (4): Correct; the passage analyses the cannabis problem and slightly favors legalizing it. (5): Incorrect; it highlights benefits rather than implications.

Multiple choice

Which of the following could have been the most suitable title for the above passage?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations - novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements. Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families - 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.

  1. Autistic Research: Some New Trends

  2. Wigler’s Work on Autism: Some Unanswered Questions

  3. The Genetic Basis of Autism: Wigler’s Work

  4. The Failure of Conventional Studies on Autism

  5. How Spontaneous Mutations Cause Autism

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Option (1) talks of some new trends, while the passage discusses only one trend: the genetics of autism. Hence, it is not justified Option (2) hints at some unanswered questions which basically refers to the critics’ viewpoint. In fact, it does not tell the whole story, it is only part of it. Not every comprehensive answer, and is therefore, rejected. Option (3) is the best one as it sums up nicely the idea of Wigler’s work on genetic basis of autism being the focus of the entire discussion. Option (4) again alludes to a secondary aspect raised by Wigler, but it does incorporate the entire passage. Option (5) ignores everything else and focuses only on spontaneous mutations. In order to be correct, it has to include something more.

Multiple choice
  1. self-proclaimed propagators of religion

  2. the clergy that sits at the citadel of church

  3. the faithful who have tried to revive the good name of Christ

  4. Christians who follow the religious tenets to maintain traditional virtue

  5. Christians who seek truth and follow Christianity for the love of the Almighty

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

Option (1): “Self-proclaimed” has negative connotation. Option (2): The “religious leaders are mere substitute of true spiritual teachers… They teach lofty sermons but their lives are devoid of the truths they preach.” Option (3): Nothing is discussed about “revival” or the name of Christ. Option (4): The phrase is not used for Christians who follow the religious tenets, but for those who seek truth and follow Christianity because of their love for God. Option (5): The phrase is used for the Christians who seek truth and follow Christianity because of their love for God. “But their souls are still full of discontent seeking the right interpretation of Truth” makes this answer correct.

Multiple choice
  1. skillful

  2. methodical

  3. professional

  4. trustworthy

  5. business-like

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

(1) Incorrect; skillful doesn't qualify the skills required. (2) Incorrect; methodical can only be equated with being organized. (3) Correct; most skills mentioned- honesty, punctuality, organized, punctual and solution- orientation can be summed into this one trait. (4) Incorrect; trustworthiness is only one part of the skills listed- honesty. (5) Incorrect; business-like would mean being only business oriented.

Multiple choice
  1. The popularity graph of mountains as a tourist destination will continue to rise.

  2. The mountains will pull the tourists away from coastal or other areas in peak season.

  3. The trend towards mountainous destinations is at the cost of other tourist destinations.

  4. Tourist traffic to other destinations will be sufficient only during vacations.

  5. Both the surveys covered the same or similar sample populace.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

(1) Incorrect. (1) is not inherent, because even if the level stabilizes, the conclusion will still be true. (2) Incorrect. (2) is rendered incorrect by a particular season only (peak season). Even if mountains pull away tourists from other areas in peak season, other areas might remain busy in other parts of the year. (3) Correct. If we withdraw the assumption at (3), the conclusion is automatically negated. Only if travelers forsake other areas for mountains will the hotels in other vacation spots lose clients. (4) Incorrect. If people choose going to these vacation spots during vacations (during other times tourist traffic is still there, though less than 'sufficient'), the hotels might not be forced to close. (5) Incorrect. This assumption, not its withdrawal, will negate the conclusion. If the surveys covered same/ similar populace, the group might not be representative of entire population and the conclusion will not hold.

Multiple choice
  1. Dukhara is racially motivated.

  2. Investigative journalists are more painstaking than government agencies are.

  3. The government agencies investigated the Wreckville bombings independently.

  4. The bombings in Wreckville were definitely conducted by Dukhara.

  5. The population of Wreckville is made up of people from different nationalities.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

(1) Correct. All the terrorist strikes conducted by Dukhara over the past 5 years have been ascribed to racial background. So we might conclude that Dukhara is indeed racially motivated. Thus we can see that the conclusion becomes true if Dukhara is racially motivated. (2) What if investigative journalists had not been as painstaking. The conclusion will rather be strengthened. (3) Whether the investigation by the government departments was independent or not does not materially affect the outcome. There could at best be a doubt, but the conclusion is not altogether negated. (4) It is by no means certain that the bombings were carried out be Dukhara, though there are pointers to this. (5) 'Different nationalities' is not the same thing as different races.

Multiple choice
  1. The TRPs will come down subsequently.

  2. Almost all TV homes visit news channels one time or the other.

  3. The increasing competition among news channels is eating into their profits.

  4. Lucrative advertisements are placed close to the timings of transmission of headlines.

  5. The TRPs do not reflect the revenue earning of the channels.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

(1) Incorrect. Future cannot be predicted to be bleak when present is so healthy. Moreover, this only confirms the argument that the TRPs haven't taken a nosedive as of now. (2) Correct. In spite of people switching channels after hearing headline news, people keep tuning into news channels. This ensures regular and heavy viewership. (3) Incorrect. The argument is about the TRPs, not about profits. 'Eating into profits' may still mean handsome profits. (4) Incorrect. This only confirms the conclusion that the TRPs haven't taken a nosedive as of now. (5) Incorrect. The argument is about the TRPs, not about advertising revenues.

Multiple choice
  1. The drop in the sales of CRT monitors is not seasonal.

  2. Computers are the chief source of entertainment in many homes.

  3. The telecom ministry makes its purchases only through tenders.

  4. CRT monitors and TV units are losing popularity in the rural market also.

  5. The preferences of the telecom ministry are similar to personal preferences for homes.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

(1) Incorrect. Even if CRT monitors demand is seasonal, the pessimism will still hold good because fall in seasonal demand means fall in total demand. (2) Incorrect. Home entertainment statistics are irrelevant. The argument is about LCD and CRT monitors, not about computers. (3) Incorrect. The mode of purchase is not the issue, the specification of purchase is, CRT monitor manufacturers have also submitted a tender. (4) Incorrect. This is additional, though irrelevant evidence, not an inherent assumption. (5) Correct. The evidence is home preference, the conclusion is general. This is flawed assumption because the requirements of the two would be quite different. This assumption is explicitly stated in (5). Only if the ministry prefers similar monitors to the ones they use at home and the general demand comes down, will the pessimism of CRT wholesalers still hold water?

Multiple choice
  1. Natives comprise a very high proportion of the educated population in some countries.

  2. English is the medium of instruction in many eastern countries.

  3. In a large number of countries English education is not just limited to a few city schools.

  4. People traveling from non-English speaking countries rely on personal contact with natives.

  5. Reading, writing and speaking English is a practice introduced at the primary level.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

(1) Incorrect. The option uses a generic 'education', instead of use of English as a medium of education and communication. 'Some countries' also makes the option restrictive. (2) Incorrect. 'Many eastern countries' makes the option very restrictive. (3) Correct. The conclusion is that English has become very popular in many parts of the world. English cannot be called a world language if its education is limited to only a few city schools in most countries, and only a small fraction of the local people is conversant with the language. It follows that schools across the world are using/ teaching English as a language. (4) Incorrect. The argument states that there is no difficulty in communicating in English. It doesn't say whether travelers rely on personal contacts (as against interpreters). (5) Incorrect. It cannot be stated with certainty. English language might be getting introduced in schools at varying levels across the world.