Law Legal Studies

Family and Marriage Law

1,817 Questions

Prepare for legal studies with practice questions on family and marriage laws, including the Hindu Marriage Act, dower in Muslim law, and divorce procedures. These questions cover custody, adoption, and domestic violence regulations. They are highly useful for law students and competitive legal exams.

Hindu Marriage ActMuslim law and dowerDivorce and alimonyChild custody and adoptionDomestic violence provisionsMarriage validity and restrictions

Family and Marriage Law Questions

Multiple choice

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

  1. does not prescribe the ceremonies requisite for solemnisation of marriage, but leaves it to the parties to choose a form of ceremonial marriage which is in accordance with any custom or usage applicable to either party

  2. does not prescribe the ceremonies requisite nor leaves it to the parties to choose

  3. does prescribe the ceremonies and does not leave it to the parties to choose

  4. does prescribe the ceremonies and at the same time, leaves it to the parties to choose
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 does not prescribe the ceremonies requisite for solemnisation of marriage, but leaves it to the parties to choose a form of ceremonial marriage which is in accordance with any custom or usage applicable to either party. 

Multiple choice

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that paramount duty of the Court in matrimonial matters should be to restore peace in the family?

  1. Bheemraya v. Suneetha

  2. Govind Dayal v. Inayatullah

  3. Durga Prasanna Tripathy v. Arundhaty Tripathy

  4. Ramesh Chand Daga v. Rameshwari Bai
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In Bheemraya v. Suneetha (2013) case, the Supreme Court held that paramount duty of the Court in matrimonial matters should be to restore peace in the family.

Multiple choice

For desertion to qualify as a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, intention to desert is

  1. a necessary condition

  2. a sufficient condition

  3. neither necessary nor sufficient condition

  4. None of these
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The following five conditions must be present to constitute a desertion:

  1. The factum of separation
  2. Animus deserdendi (intention to desert)
  3. Desertion without any reasonable cause
  4. Desertion without consent of other party
  5. Statutory period of two years must have run out before a petition is presented.
Multiple choice

What does Polyandry mean?

  1. The practice of a man having several wives

  2. The practice of a woman having several husbands

  3. Both 1 and 2

  4. None of these
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Polyandry is central to the narrative of the epic Mahabharata. It means the practice of a woman having several husbands.

Multiple choice

Directions: Choose the appropriate option from (1 - 4) according to the information given in the reading passage.

Litigation regarding right to company of either spouse is stated to be 'controversial subject' because

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows.

As per law when a man and woman are married, it is clearly understood that both would live together and share a conjugal relationship. However, sometimes, problems are caused due to several factors-ill treatment of woman by her in-laws, joint family issues, employment of the woman in some other town or husband’s behaviour towards his wife. In worst cases a woman might even opt to walk out of husband’s house. Commonly, the husband would make his best of efforts to bring back his wife to his house. Husband might go to the court as a last option. It is much too controversial subject to pass judgement on legal issues pertaining the right of one spouse to demand the company of the other. It has been over a century since this subject was recognized in India. The restitution of conjugal rights was introduced into Indian law during the British rule. It is interesting to know the history as to how this provision got into the laws related to marriage and divorce in our country. The origin of this provision is found in the religious courts of England where a decree of ‘restitution of conjugal rights’ could be issued and an unwilling spouse was compelled by law to live with the complaining spouse. Those who disobeyed the orders could be imprisoned. In India, according to the traditional Hindu law, litigation regarding matters of marriage was not permitted so the husband and wife were obliged to stick together for a lifetime. Husband was treated as a god by his wife and the wife could be separated from husband neither by ‘sale’ nor by ‘desertion’ as mentioned by Manu, the author of ancient text that provided grounds for litigation in India.

  1. it is difficult to identify the culprit

  2. issues regarding treatment of one spouse by the other are generally ambiguous

  3. the law does not grant equal rights to both in this regard

  4. no reason is mentioned
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

No reason is mentioned in the passage.

Multiple choice

Directions: Choose the appropriate option from (1 - 4) according to the information given in the reading passage.

Which of the following is the most suitable title for the passage?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows.

As per law when a man and woman are married, it is clearly understood that both would live together and share a conjugal relationship. However, sometimes, problems are caused due to several factors-ill treatment of woman by her in-laws, joint family issues, employment of the woman in some other town or husband’s behaviour towards his wife. In worst cases a woman might even opt to walk out of husband’s house. Commonly, the husband would make his best of efforts to bring back his wife to his house. Husband might go to the court as a last option. It is much too controversial subject to pass judgement on legal issues pertaining the right of one spouse to demand the company of the other. It has been over a century since this subject was recognized in India. The restitution of conjugal rights was introduced into Indian law during the British rule. It is interesting to know the history as to how this provision got into the laws related to marriage and divorce in our country. The origin of this provision is found in the religious courts of England where a decree of ‘restitution of conjugal rights’ could be issued and an unwilling spouse was compelled by law to live with the complaining spouse. Those who disobeyed the orders could be imprisoned. In India, according to the traditional Hindu law, litigation regarding matters of marriage was not permitted so the husband and wife were obliged to stick together for a lifetime. Husband was treated as a god by his wife and the wife could be separated from husband neither by ‘sale’ nor by ‘desertion’ as mentioned by Manu, the author of ancient text that provided grounds for litigation in India.

  1. Restitution of Conjugal Rights

  2. Right to Company

  3. Family Disputes

  4. Marriage and Divorce
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

This is the most suitable title as it suggests the core issue discussed in the passage.

Multiple choice

Directions: Choose the appropriate option from (1 - 4) according to the information given in the reading passage.

In England, a decree of restitution of conjugal rights could be issued in

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows.

As per law when a man and woman are married, it is clearly understood that both would live together and share a conjugal relationship. However, sometimes, problems are caused due to several factors-ill treatment of woman by her in-laws, joint family issues, employment of the woman in some other town or husband’s behaviour towards his wife. In worst cases a woman might even opt to walk out of husband’s house. Commonly, the husband would make his best of efforts to bring back his wife to his house. Husband might go to the court as a last option. It is much too controversial subject to pass judgement on legal issues pertaining the right of one spouse to demand the company of the other. It has been over a century since this subject was recognized in India. The restitution of conjugal rights was introduced into Indian law during the British rule. It is interesting to know the history as to how this provision got into the laws related to marriage and divorce in our country. The origin of this provision is found in the religious courts of England where a decree of ‘restitution of conjugal rights’ could be issued and an unwilling spouse was compelled by law to live with the complaining spouse. Those who disobeyed the orders could be imprisoned. In India, according to the traditional Hindu law, litigation regarding matters of marriage was not permitted so the husband and wife were obliged to stick together for a lifetime. Husband was treated as a god by his wife and the wife could be separated from husband neither by ‘sale’ nor by ‘desertion’ as mentioned by Manu, the author of ancient text that provided grounds for litigation in India.

  1. a court of law

  2. church of England

  3. religious courts of England

  4. exceptional cases

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

It is mentioned in the passage.

Multiple choice

Directions: Choose the appropriate option from (1 - 4) according to the information given in the reading passage.

Which out of the following is not mentioned as a reason of dispute in marriage?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows.

As per law when a man and woman are married, it is clearly understood that both would live together and share a conjugal relationship. However, sometimes, problems are caused due to several factors-ill treatment of woman by her in-laws, joint family issues, employment of the woman in some other town or husband’s behaviour towards his wife. In worst cases a woman might even opt to walk out of husband’s house. Commonly, the husband would make his best of efforts to bring back his wife to his house. Husband might go to the court as a last option. It is much too controversial subject to pass judgement on legal issues pertaining the right of one spouse to demand the company of the other. It has been over a century since this subject was recognized in India. The restitution of conjugal rights was introduced into Indian law during the British rule. It is interesting to know the history as to how this provision got into the laws related to marriage and divorce in our country. The origin of this provision is found in the religious courts of England where a decree of ‘restitution of conjugal rights’ could be issued and an unwilling spouse was compelled by law to live with the complaining spouse. Those who disobeyed the orders could be imprisoned. In India, according to the traditional Hindu law, litigation regarding matters of marriage was not permitted so the husband and wife were obliged to stick together for a lifetime. Husband was treated as a god by his wife and the wife could be separated from husband neither by ‘sale’ nor by ‘desertion’ as mentioned by Manu, the author of ancient text that provided grounds for litigation in India.

  1. Joint family matters

  2. Ill treatment of woman by her in-laws

  3. Illicit relation of either man or woman

  4. Employment of woman in other town
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

It is not mentioned in the passage.

Multiple choice

Directions: Choose the appropriate option from (1 - 4) according to the information given in the reading passage.

Which of the following statements may be inferred from the passage?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows.

As per law when a man and woman are married, it is clearly understood that both would live together and share a conjugal relationship. However, sometimes, problems are caused due to several factors-ill treatment of woman by her in-laws, joint family issues, employment of the woman in some other town or husband’s behaviour towards his wife. In worst cases a woman might even opt to walk out of husband’s house. Commonly, the husband would make his best of efforts to bring back his wife to his house. Husband might go to the court as a last option. It is much too controversial subject to pass judgement on legal issues pertaining the right of one spouse to demand the company of the other. It has been over a century since this subject was recognized in India. The restitution of conjugal rights was introduced into Indian law during the British rule. It is interesting to know the history as to how this provision got into the laws related to marriage and divorce in our country. The origin of this provision is found in the religious courts of England where a decree of ‘restitution of conjugal rights’ could be issued and an unwilling spouse was compelled by law to live with the complaining spouse. Those who disobeyed the orders could be imprisoned. In India, according to the traditional Hindu law, litigation regarding matters of marriage was not permitted so the husband and wife were obliged to stick together for a lifetime. Husband was treated as a god by his wife and the wife could be separated from husband neither by ‘sale’ nor by ‘desertion’ as mentioned by Manu, the author of ancient text that provided grounds for litigation in India.

  1. Matrimonial issues were better dealt with in India traditionally than in England.

  2. Provisions to settle the matrimonial issues in past in both England and India were equally flawed.

  3. Religious courts of England provided for a more effective model for the settlement of marriage related issues.

  4. Matrimonial issues were better dealt with in England traditionally than in India.
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Law was flawed in both cases to settle such issues. In Engand litigation was unfair whereas there was no provision for litigation in India.