Law Legal Studies ยท Civics Polity

Fundamental and Human Rights

1,430 Questions

This set of questions covers fundamental rights, human rights, and constitutional provisions like the Right against Exploitation. It also explores international declarations and individual liberties. These topics are frequently tested in UPSC and state PSC examinations.

Constitutional provisionsInternational human rightsRight to privacyMinority rightsRight against exploitation

Fundamental and Human Rights Questions

Multiple choice

What is the term used to describe the right of Indigenous Peoples to maintain and develop their own traditional governance systems?

  1. Self-government rights

  2. Cultural rights

  3. Political rights

  4. All of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Self-government rights, cultural rights, and political rights are all terms used to describe the right of Indigenous Peoples to maintain and develop their own traditional governance systems. This right is essential for the survival and revitalization of Indigenous cultures and communities.

Multiple choice

What is the term used to describe the right of Indigenous Peoples to maintain and develop their own traditional economic systems?

  1. Economic rights

  2. Cultural rights

  3. Self-determination rights

  4. All of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Economic rights, cultural rights, and self-determination rights are all terms used to describe the right of Indigenous Peoples to maintain and develop their own traditional economic systems. This right is essential for the survival and revitalization of Indigenous cultures and communities.

Multiple choice

What is the term used to describe the right of Indigenous Peoples to maintain and develop their own traditional education systems?

  1. Education rights

  2. Cultural rights

  3. Self-determination rights

  4. All of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Education rights, cultural rights, and self-determination rights are all terms used to describe the right of Indigenous Peoples to maintain and develop their own traditional education systems. This right is essential for the survival and revitalization of Indigenous cultures and communities.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to life includes the right to a healthy environment?

  1. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987)

  2. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  3. Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar (1991)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to a healthy environment. This case is considered to be a watershed moment in the development of PIL in India, as it established the principle that environmental protection is a fundamental right.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to education is a fundamental right?

  1. Unnikrishnan J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993)

  2. Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka (1992)

  3. Asha Devi v. State of Bihar (2006)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Unnikrishnan J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to education is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to education in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to provide free and compulsory education to all children between the ages of 6 and 14.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to food is a fundamental right?

  1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  2. Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996)

  3. Right to Food Campaign v. Union of India (2001)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to food is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to food in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to provide food to all its citizens.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to shelter is a fundamental right?

  1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  2. Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996)

  3. Right to Shelter Campaign v. Union of India (2001)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1996), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to shelter is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to shelter in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to provide shelter to all its citizens.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to health is a fundamental right?

  1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  2. Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996)

  3. Right to Health Campaign v. Union of India (2001)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Right to Health Campaign v. Union of India (2001), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to health is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to health in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to provide healthcare to all its citizens.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to information is a fundamental right?

  1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  2. Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996)

  3. Right to Information Campaign v. Union of India (2005)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Right to Information Campaign v. Union of India (2005), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to information is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to information in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to provide information to all its citizens.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to privacy is a fundamental right?

  1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  2. Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996)

  3. Right to Privacy Campaign v. Union of India (2017)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Right to Privacy Campaign v. Union of India (2017), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to privacy in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to protect the privacy of all its citizens.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to a clean environment is a fundamental right?

  1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  2. Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996)

  3. Right to a Clean Environment Campaign v. Union of India (2018)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Right to a Clean Environment Campaign v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to a clean environment is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to a clean environment in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to protect the environment and to ensure that all citizens have access to a clean environment.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right?

  1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  2. Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996)

  3. Right to a Speedy Trial Campaign v. Union of India (2019)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Right to a Speedy Trial Campaign v. Union of India (2019), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to a speedy trial in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to ensure that all criminal trials are completed within a reasonable time.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to a fair trial is a fundamental right?

  1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  2. Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996)

  3. Right to a Fair Trial Campaign v. Union of India (2020)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Right to a Fair Trial Campaign v. Union of India (2020), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to a fair trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to a fair trial in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to ensure that all criminal trials are conducted in a fair and just manner.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to legal aid is a fundamental right?

  1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  2. Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996)

  3. Right to Legal Aid Campaign v. Union of India (2021)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Right to Legal Aid Campaign v. Union of India (2021), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to legal aid is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to legal aid in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to provide legal aid to all persons who are unable to afford it.

Multiple choice

In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that the right to a dignified life is a fundamental right?

  1. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

  2. Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996)

  3. Right to a Dignified Life Campaign v. Union of India (2022)

  4. None of the above
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In the landmark case of Right to a Dignified Life Campaign v. Union of India (2022), the Supreme Court of India held that the right to a dignified life is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This case is considered to be a major victory for the right to a dignified life in India, as it made it a fundamental duty of the state to ensure that all persons have access to the basic necessities of life, such as food, water, shelter, and healthcare.