Multiple choice

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that there was no rule of thumb that in every case of termination of workman’s service in violation of Section 25F of ID Act relief of re-instatement should be granted?

  1. Talwara Co-operative Credit & Service Society Ltd. Vs. Sushil Kumar (2009) I LLJ 326 S.C.

  2. Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. Vs. G.S.T. Mazdoor Sabha (1980) I LLJ 137 (S.C.)

  3. Mavji C. Lakum Vs. Central Bank of India (2008) III LLJ.1.(SC)

  4. None of these
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

(4) In General Manager, Haryana Roadways v. Rudhan Singh, 2005, Court observed that there is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded.

Keep practicing — related questions