Tag: security

Questions Related to security

  1. Client (Browser)

  2. Database

  3. Web Application

  4. Web Server


Correct Option: A
  1. Compromise of users

  2. Loss of data integrity

  3. Destruction of data

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A

Out of the following which can be considered as user input for which validation is not required

  1. Host Header

  2. Cookie

  3. Referrer Header

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: D

AI Explanation

To answer this question, we need to understand the concept of user input and validation.

User input refers to any data or information that is provided by the user through an input field or interaction with a system or application. Validation, on the other hand, is the process of ensuring that the user input meets certain criteria or requirements, such as data type, format, length, or range.

Now let's go through each option to determine if validation is required for user input:

Option A) Host Header - The Host header is an HTTP header that specifies the domain name of the requested resource. While it is important to validate the Host header for security reasons, it is not considered user input. The Host header is typically generated by the client or server and is not directly controlled by the user. Therefore, validation is not required for the Host header.

Option B) Cookie - Cookies are small pieces of data that are stored on the user's device and are used to track and store information about the user's interactions with a website. While cookies can contain user input, the validation of the cookie data would typically occur on the server-side rather than at the point of user input. Therefore, validation is not required for cookies as user input.

Option C) Referrer Header - The Referrer header is an HTTP header that provides information about the URL of the webpage that linked to the current page. Similar to the Host header, the Referrer header is typically generated by the client or server and is not directly controlled by the user. Therefore, validation is not required for the Referrer header.

Option D) None of the above - This option is the correct answer. None of the options mentioned (Host Header, Cookie, Referrer Header) can be considered as user input for which validation is required.

Therefore, the correct answer is D) None of the above.

  1. Web Server configuration files

  2. Application configuration files

  3. Application error handlers

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
  1. Java sand box environment provides protection against decompilation

  2. Java is compiled into ELF binaries and cannot be decompiled

  3. Java byte code can always be decompiled, code obfuscators can make the reverse engineering process more time confusing but cannot prevent it

  4. Java is difficult to decompile because the Just-In-Time compiler automatically perform string encryption by default


Correct Option: C
  1. Equivalent to normal users

  2. Less than those of normal users as all administrators are trustworthy

  3. No authentication is required for administrators

  4. Greater than those of normal users


Correct Option: D
  1. Only be used on administrator accounts to ensure continuous access to users

  2. Only be used on user accounts to ensure that administrators are not locked out of the application

  3. Only be used when there is a secure process to unlock the account

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: C
  1. Cannot be treated as a secure practice

  2. Is a good way to hide passwords from hackers

  3. Is perfectly fine for internal applications

  4. Is perfectly fine for external user facing applications


Correct Option: A
  1. Java

  2. ASP.Net

  3. Perl

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

To answer this question, let's go through each option to understand which languages are vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks:

Option A) Java - Java itself is not vulnerable to XSS attacks. However, if a Java application uses web technologies like servlets, JSP, or JavaServer Faces (JSF), then the vulnerabilities in these technologies can lead to XSS attacks. Therefore, Java can be vulnerable to XSS attacks indirectly.

Option B) ASP.Net - Similar to Java, ASP.Net itself is not vulnerable to XSS attacks. However, if an ASP.Net application does not properly handle user input or output encoding, it can be vulnerable to XSS attacks. Therefore, ASP.Net can be vulnerable to XSS attacks indirectly.

Option C) Perl - Perl itself is not vulnerable to XSS attacks. However, if a Perl application does not properly handle user input or output encoding, it can be vulnerable to XSS attacks. Therefore, Perl can be vulnerable to XSS attacks indirectly.

Option D) All of the above - This option is correct. While the languages themselves (Java, ASP.Net, and Perl) are not directly vulnerable to XSS attacks, the vulnerabilities arise when these languages are used in web applications and proper security measures are not implemented. Therefore, all of the above languages can be vulnerable to XSS attacks indirectly.

The correct answer is D) All of the above. These languages can be vulnerable to XSS attacks when used in web applications that do not handle user input or output encoding properly.