Tag: softskills
Questions Related to softskills
-
orthodox
-
timely
-
liberal
-
clear
-
To slobber drool: to talk stupidly or childishly
-
to break or ignore the terms or obligations of..; violate; to go beyond the boundaries or limits of; tresspass; encroach
-
pertaining to the essential nature of a thing; inherent; situated within or belonging solely to a body part, as certain nerves and muscles.
-
to make a guess or conjecture
-
Pompous: gradiloquent: arrogant
-
A state of exhaustion or torpot.
-
to violate the legally established trading rights of others; to interfere in the affairs of others; intrude; meddle
-
Incite; urge
-
zatfig
-
voluptuous
-
stacked
-
lean
-
to break or ignore the terms or obligations of..; violate; to go beyond the boundaries or limits of; tresspass; encroach
-
Incite; urge
-
to violate the legally established trading rights of others; to interfere in the affairs of others; intrude; meddle
-
To slobber drool: to talk stupidly or childishly
-
to violate the legally established trading rights of others; to interfere in the affairs of others; intrude; meddle
-
To urge or incite by strong argument, advice, or appeal; admonish earnestly.
-
pertaining to the essential nature of a thing; inherent; situated within or belonging solely to a body part, as certain nerves and muscles
-
To slobber drool: to talk stupidly or childishly
Correct Option: B
Explanation:
To solve this question, the user needs to know the correct subject-verb agreement. The sentence has a subject "Two-fifths of the troops" that requires a verb that agrees with it in number.
Options A, C, and D are incorrect because they use the singular verb form "was" or "has", which does not agree in number with the plural subject "Two-fifths of the troops."
Option B is correct because it uses the plural verb form "were," which agrees in number with the plural subject "Two-fifths of the troops."
Therefore, the answer is: B) were.
-
nonenterprising
-
go-getter
-
tenacious
-
gruesome
-
nonenterprising
-
go-getter
-
tenacious
-
gruesome