Reading Comprehension Questions

Multiple choice
  1. The two scientists won the Nobel Prize in medicine.

  2. Life before the discovery of Penicillin was full of infectious diseases.

  3. Penicillin given to animals proved deadly.

  4. Penicillin was not helpful in treating infectious diseases.

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

This is true as, the passage says, "life before Penicillin was fraught with untamable infection and few defensive tools."

Multiple choice
  1. It could kill bacteria and this could not be given to animals.

  2. It could kill bacteria and could be given to animals without any harm.

  3. It could kill human beings if given in a large quantity.

  4. It can be put in the bottles as a powder form.

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

This is the corrct answer as the passage says, "He identified the mold as penicillium notatum, and upon further research found that it could kill other bacteria and could be given to small animals without ill effect."

Multiple choice
  1. It is about the unsolved mystery of 'The Bermuda Triangle'.

  2. It is about the disappearance of many ships and seamen.

  3. It is about the triangle.

  4. It is about the wonders of the world.

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

This is the correct answer as the passage says, "In most of these disappearances, it is the fact that no distress signal was ever received from the disappearing ships or planes that enhance the cloud of mystery that surrounds them."

Multiple choice
  1. Tinker

  2. Bake

  3. Embark

  4. Settle

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

It means 'to attempt to repair or improve something in a casual or desultory way'.

Multiple choice
  1. It is about Will Keith Kellogg.

  2. It is about the patients' diet.

  3. It is about baking food.

  4. It is about the invention of corn flakes.

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

It is the answer as the passage says, Kellogg stumbled upon a discovery that would change his life.

Multiple choice
  1. It is because he was helping patients with their diets.

  2. It is because he has a bakery.

  3. It is because he was ordered by his brother to do so.

  4. It is because he was a cook.

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

It is the exact reason as the passage says, "One day he was conducting research with his brother and helping him cook meals for the patients."

Multiple choice
  1. Curative

  2. Untamable

  3. Ill

  4. Infectious

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

It means not capable of being controlled.

Multiple choice
  1. It was corn.

  2. It was wheat.

  3. It was flour.

  4. It was maize.

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

This is the correct answer as the passage says, "the wheat became flaky. Curious to see what would happen, Kellogg baked the flaky dough anyway, creating a crunchy and flaky snack."

Multiple choice
  1. Will Keith Kellogg was a doctor in a famous hospital and known for his discoveries.

  2. Will Keith Kellogg left boiled corn for several hours and the corn became flaky.

  3. Will Kellogg tinkered with his recipe and started using corn as the main ingredient.

  4. The name of the company owned by Kellogg was The Kellog's.

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

This is true as the passage says, "Will Kellogg tinkered with his recipe and finally settled on using corn as a main ingredient for the flakes."

Multiple choice
  1. The Bermuda Triangle is also known as the divine triangle

  2. No signal was ever received from the disappeared ships and boats in the Bermuda Triangle

  3. Very strange storms and weather conditions frequently occur in the Bermuda Triangle

  4. The Bermuda Triangle is an area in Pacific ocean

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

It is true as the passage says, "in most of these disappearances, it is the fact that no distress signal was ever received from the disappearing ships or planes that enhances the cloud of mystery that surrounds them."

Multiple choice
  1. Numerous

  2. Downward

  3. Unnatural

  4. Peculiar

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

It means different from what is normal or expected; strange.

Multiple choice
  1. It is because no one wants to step there as all have a fear of disappearing.

  2. It is because no signal was received by anything that disappeared in the triangle.

  3. It is because the triangle is very deep and it is impossible to reach to that depth.

  4. It is because there are always storms and downward air current in that area.

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

It is the exact reason as the passage says, "It is the fact that no distress signal was ever received from the disappearing ships or planes that enhance the cloud of mystery that surrounds them."

Multiple choice
  1. It was because they discovered a bacteria culture.

  2. It was because they were good scientists.

  3. It was because they discovered Penicillin.

  4. It was because they discovered a pain killer.

  5. dummy

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

It is the correct answer as the passage says, "The three won the Nobel Prize in medicine in 1945 for the discovery of penicillin and its curative effect in various infectious diseases.”

Multiple choice
  1. By imaginary lines

  2. By fencing the area

  3. By building towers around it

  4. By building a bridge over it

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

It is the correct answer as the passage says, "Boundaries of the Bermuda Triangle are formed by drawing an imaginary line."

Multiple choice

In gene therapy

Directions: Read the following passage carefully to answer the given question. 

Genes too often get a bad press. This is not surprising since there are "bad" genes as well as "good" ones, and bad news grips readers more than good news. Bad genes are actually mutated good genes which because of altered DNA messages, do not function normally. One particularly bad gene leads to Huntington's disease, which progressively destroys key nerve cells. Most of an individual's genes, however, are inherently good. Collectively they are the instruction book for our bodies. Without the right instructions from our genes, we could not develop into functioning adults. And fortunately, many bad genes - like that for cystic fibrosis - have no immediate consequence since they are expressed only when copies are inherited from both the father and mother. Carriers possessing only one copy of this gene are much more common (around one in 25) than individuals with the disease (around one in 2,300). Until recently, there was no way to isolate and characterise bad genes. They were known only by their consequences: disease. Today, however thanks to the development of powerful new ways for studying DNA, there is a flood of information about the faulty genes implicated in virtually every major human disease, including diabetes, cancer and asthma. Every week or so, a new disease gene is discovered.

But with almost routine ways now available to test DNA samples for the presence of specific mutant genes, there is increased anxiety that an individual's genetic heritage may be vulnerable to unwanted prying. The DNA from a single human hair for example may be sufficient to alert a prospective employer or health insurer to a person's genetic predisposition to disease. Broad privacy laws must therefore be enacted to forbid genetic tests without the informed consent of the individual involved. But even with such laws, dilemmas will arise when individuals do not realise the significance of the proposed genetic screening. These tests warn of impending disease, but do not cure. And how many people would want to have certain knowledge that they will contract a disease for which there is no cure?

Banishing genetic disability must therefore be our primary concern. We would not worry about testing for a predisposing gene for Alzheimer's disease if we already had the cure. In this case, knowing that an individual is seriously predisposed might allow drug therapy to begin before brain functioning is irreversibly diminished. The recent discovery of several genes whose malfunctioning leads to Alzheimer's provides the pharmaceutical industry with important molecular targets for drug development. Only through the discovery of these kinds of genes can biomedical research stop this most pernicious cause of human senility.

We must never, however, live under the misconception that we will ever effectively control the majority of genetic diseases. Many are likely to prove intractable to drug therapies or gene therapies in which good genes are introduced into cells to compensate for bad ones. It will be particularly difficult to compensate for genes that malfunction during foetal development. If key genes controlling the networking of brain cells don't come into action in the womb, no drug or gene therapy procedure will be able to correctly rewire the brain later. There is a great difference of opinion as to whether steps should be taken to prevent the birth of genetically impaired children. Many are opposed for religious reasons to trying to control the genetic destinies of children. Others, recalling Germany's eugenic practice whereby the crude racial and class prejudices of early eugenicists are replaced by scientific demonstrations of genetic inequality.

But the possibility of controlling our children's genetic destiny strikes me as only good. It is grossly unfair that some families’ lives are dominated by the horrors of genetic disease. As a biologist, I know that people suffering from genetic disease are the victims of unlucky throws of the genetic dice. Mutation has been, and always will be, an essential fact of life, since it is through mistake in gene replication that the positive genetic variants arise which are the lifeblood of evolution. If the gene copying process were perfect, life as it now exists never would have come about. Genetic disease is the price we pay for the extraordinary evolutionary process that has given rise to the wonders of life on earth.

I thus do not see genetic diseases in any way as an expression of the complex will of any supernatural authority, but rather as random tragedies that we should do everything in our power to prevent. Here is, of course, nothing pleasant about terminating the existence of a genetically disabled foetus. But doing so is comparably more compassionate than allowing an infant to come into the world tragically impaired. There is, of course, the question of who should have the authority to make decisions of this kind. Here the message of past eugenic practices is clear. Never let a government, no matter how apparently benign, into the process. The potential mother should have this authority. It is she who is likely to be most involved with the upbringing of the child.

I am aware that some will argue that the foetus has an inalienable right to life. But the process of evolution never regards any form of life, be it adult or foetal as an inalienable right. It's better to see humans as wonderful social animals having needs (for food, health and sex, for example), capabilities (for thought and love among others) and responsibilities (including that to work with other human beings to see that everyone's needs are adequately met). Working intelligently and wisely to see that good genes - not bad ones - dominate as many lives as possible is the truly moral way for us to proceed.

  1. good genes are introduced into cells to compensate for bad ones

  2. bad genes are removed by surgery

  3. laser treatment is given to remove bad cells

  4. genetic disorders are mutated

  5. none of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

"Many are likely to prove intractable to drug therapies or gene therapies in which good genes are introduced into cells to compensate for bad ones."