Reading Comprehension Questions

Multiple choice

Choose the correct statement:

Directions:  Read the passage below and answer the question given underneath.
The urban poor are experiencing the same level of health as their equivalent in rural areas. Both communities have an equal status of poor health among their respective population. While there may be different characteristics for single population in different cities, they all share many common features which affect health status and social challenges. These include overcrowding, air pollution, tobacco use, unhealthy diet, lack of physical activity, alcohol and drug abuse, road injuries, etc. Other difficulties and challenges center on poor infrastructure which would include poor solid waste management, insufficient access to health care, particularly in slum areas. Most cities also face various challenges in terms of communicable diseases, non-communicable diseases, maternal and child care issues, natural disasters and the threat of reemerging and emerging diseases. As per the UHRC, one in every ten children in the slums do not live upto the age of five years in India. Furthermore, nearly 42% of slum children receive recommended vaccinations. Over half of child births that take place among poor women occur at home in slums, which puts both the mother and the newborn at risk. Another risk factor is the poor sanitation found in slums, which contributes to the high rate of diseases. Two-thirds of urban poor households do not have access to toilets and nearly 50% do not have running water supplied to their homes.
Currently, the Indian health system is more focussed towards those poor in rural areas and it has an organisational structure that begins from the grass roots to tertiary care which is managed by dedicated staff. Unfortunately, there is a huge deficiency of services and structures in urban areas. To add to this, a very rapid growth of the urban population has overburdened the existing system. The majority of healthcare in cities is mainly served by private sector doctors and hospitals which tends to cost much higher and is not accessible to the most urban poor.

  1. Currently, the Indian health system is focussed more towards those poor in rural areas.

  2. Currently, the Indian health system is focussed more towards those poor in urban areas.

  3. Currently, the Indian health system is focussed on both the poor in rural and urban areas.

  4. Currently, the Indian health system is more focussed on private sector patients.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation
  1. Correct – This statement is directly quoted from the passage.
    2. Incorrect – This is incorrect as the Indian health system is more focussed in rural areas, not urban areas.
    3. Incorrect – This is incorrect as the Indian health system is more focussed only in rural areas, not both rural and urban areas.
    1. Incorrect – This is incorrect as the Indian health system is focussed on the rural poor, not patients from the private sector.
Multiple choice
  1. is promoted as it has proved to be advantageous to the people

  2. should be replaced by panchayati raj institutions and local bodies

  3. has proved to be damaging to the work culture and has led to sycophancy and nepotism

  4. by the government gives step-motherly treatment to local bodies and panchayats

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The passage explicitly states that the centralization of power has proven damaging to work culture and has led to an oppressive network of sycophancy and nepotism.

Multiple choice
  1. it should be advertised a lot

  2. a detailed brand identity must be developed

  3. we must use high flying celebrities

  4. we must associate brand name with something memorable

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Multiple choice
  1. It makes the brand memorable.

  2. It is killing for the brand image.

  3. One must be very cautious about it.

  4. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Multiple choice

How have media and press played a vital role in making Bermuda Triangle a mystery?

Directions: Read the following passage and then answer the question that follows:

PASSAGE – III

The Bermuda Triangle has always been shrouded in mystery. The missing ships and planes have roused irrevocable inquisitiveness among people. Many theories pertaining to extraterrestrials, evil humans, anti gravity, magnetic field, oceanic flatulence and other technical sounding and weird hypothesis have been put forth. But a few investigators contrive ill luck, pirates, incompetence of navigators to be the cause of these missing  ships  and  planes.  A  few  diehard  rationalists  believe there is no mystery element that needs to be explained as the figures pertaining to wrecks is common when there is such exceeding traffic on sea. The missing ships perhaps had never touched Bermuda Triangle’s domain. No scientific derivations prove any aura of mystery enveloping Bermuda Triangle. The surprising subject rather is how Bermuda Triangle became so centralized a topic of mystery.

Probably it began with the disappearance of five Navy planes in 1945. Logic states they vanished due to bad weather and failure of compass field. The trainee pilots lacked the expertise to face the sudden ordeal. The other declaration was that the planes collapsed due to fuel shortage. But in no way any mystery element coincides. This has been a revered subject for writers as a lot of written material can be found about it. It’s perhaps surprising that no one took the investigation on the mystery. Rather they all cashed this mystery to write their best sellers. They passed these derivations of the past without pondering on them. Slowly Bermuda Triangle mystery evolved as a farce as these irresponsible authors did not foresee how their accounts would change a myth into a truth in public eye. The mass media too played in phlegmatic attitude in solving this. They plundered the mystery element to spice up their news items. Soon the superstitious called it the ‘Devil’s Triangle’. Some considered it to be the alien’s domain and some called the Atlantis the cursed water which gobbled whoever came across. But it’s a fact that all these exaggerations have helped to lend fear and fascination to the world’s greatest mystery the Bermuda Triangle.

  1. By describing the incidents with a superstitious tint.

  2. By exploiting the subject's mystery to spice up their best sellers.

  3. By disassociating the reality from the myths.

  4. By adding phrases like 'Devil's Triangle' to it.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Option (2): It is a specific detail question: “The mass media too played in phlegmatic attitude in solving this. They plundered the mystery element to spice up their news items”.

Multiple choice

What is the main aim of the author?

Directions: Read the following passage and then answer the question that follows:

PASSAGE – III

The Bermuda Triangle has always been shrouded in mystery. The missing ships and planes have roused irrevocable inquisitiveness among people. Many theories pertaining to extraterrestrials, evil humans, anti gravity, magnetic field, oceanic flatulence and other technical sounding and weird hypothesis have been put forth. But a few investigators contrive ill luck, pirates, incompetence of navigators to be the cause of these missing  ships  and  planes.  A  few  diehard  rationalists  believe there is no mystery element that needs to be explained as the figures pertaining to wrecks is common when there is such exceeding traffic on sea. The missing ships perhaps had never touched Bermuda Triangle’s domain. No scientific derivations prove any aura of mystery enveloping Bermuda Triangle. The surprising subject rather is how Bermuda Triangle became so centralized a topic of mystery.

Probably it began with the disappearance of five Navy planes in 1945. Logic states they vanished due to bad weather and failure of compass field. The trainee pilots lacked the expertise to face the sudden ordeal. The other declaration was that the planes collapsed due to fuel shortage. But in no way any mystery element coincides. This has been a revered subject for writers as a lot of written material can be found about it. It’s perhaps surprising that no one took the investigation on the mystery. Rather they all cashed this mystery to write their best sellers. They passed these derivations of the past without pondering on them. Slowly Bermuda Triangle mystery evolved as a farce as these irresponsible authors did not foresee how their accounts would change a myth into a truth in public eye. The mass media too played in phlegmatic attitude in solving this. They plundered the mystery element to spice up their news items. Soon the superstitious called it the ‘Devil’s Triangle’. Some considered it to be the alien’s domain and some called the Atlantis the cursed water which gobbled whoever came across. But it’s a fact that all these exaggerations have helped to lend fear and fascination to the world’s greatest mystery the Bermuda Triangle.

  1. To discuss the suspense behind 'Bermuda Triangle'.

  2. To investigate the mystery of missing ships around 'Bermuda Triangle'.

  3. To debate the realistic and superstitious content linked with Bermuda Triangle.

  4. To discuss the role of media and some authors in creating this aura of mystery around 'Bermuda Triangle'.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Option (3): The passage deals with the rationalist and the superstitious views of 'Bermuda Triangle' This option covers both the points, thus is the correct answer.

Multiple choice

What is more surprising than the mystery of Bermuda Triangle?

Directions: Read the following passage and then answer the question that follows:

PASSAGE – III

The Bermuda Triangle has always been shrouded in mystery. The missing ships and planes have roused irrevocable inquisitiveness among people. Many theories pertaining to extraterrestrials, evil humans, anti gravity, magnetic field, oceanic flatulence and other technical sounding and weird hypothesis have been put forth. But a few investigators contrive ill luck, pirates, incompetence of navigators to be the cause of these missing  ships  and  planes.  A  few  diehard  rationalists  believe there is no mystery element that needs to be explained as the figures pertaining to wrecks is common when there is such exceeding traffic on sea. The missing ships perhaps had never touched Bermuda Triangle’s domain. No scientific derivations prove any aura of mystery enveloping Bermuda Triangle. The surprising subject rather is how Bermuda Triangle became so centralized a topic of mystery.

Probably it began with the disappearance of five Navy planes in 1945. Logic states they vanished due to bad weather and failure of compass field. The trainee pilots lacked the expertise to face the sudden ordeal. The other declaration was that the planes collapsed due to fuel shortage. But in no way any mystery element coincides. This has been a revered subject for writers as a lot of written material can be found about it. It’s perhaps surprising that no one took the investigation on the mystery. Rather they all cashed this mystery to write their best sellers. They passed these derivations of the past without pondering on them. Slowly Bermuda Triangle mystery evolved as a farce as these irresponsible authors did not foresee how their accounts would change a myth into a truth in public eye. The mass media too played in phlegmatic attitude in solving this. They plundered the mystery element to spice up their news items. Soon the superstitious called it the ‘Devil’s Triangle’. Some considered it to be the alien’s domain and some called the Atlantis the cursed water which gobbled whoever came across. But it’s a fact that all these exaggerations have helped to lend fear and fascination to the world’s greatest mystery the Bermuda Triangle.

  1. How the compelling forces of nature made Bermuda Triangle such an important mystery.

  2. The phlegmatic attitude of the researchers towards the mystery.

  3. The reasons that turned Bermuda mystery into such obscure a subject.

  4. The irresponsible derivations made on the subject and propagation of the same.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Option (3): It is a direct question and the answer can be derived from Lines: 'The surprising subject rather is how Bermuda Triangle became so centralized a topic of mystery'.

Multiple choice

The passage is taken from

Directions: Read the following passage and then answer the question that follows:

PASSAGE – IV

Then I told him, “It’s the shoes, silly.” Of all recruitment filters this must be the strangest. Or is it? Speak to a journeyman recruiter about what puts her off someone she is interviewing, and the list that emerges is stranger still. “Overgrown nails, tight clothes, nasal hair, dandruff, a loud tie, louder socks, mini skirts, cleavage, tattoos…”.

Probe a little further and the list acquires a psychographic tinge: “Arrogance, obsequiousness, a know-it-all attitude, inability to listen …..“. Smart recruiters do not need too much time to look for these: the duration of the interview itself will do. Ask Dr. Yasho V. Verma, LG’s head of HR. “I never listen to what people have to say; it is far more important how they say it.” That statement should endear him to the proponents of the form-over-content school of thought.

There is enough scientific evidence to suggest that hiring decisions are based as much on form as on content. Social psychologists have estimated that we make up to 10 (value) judgments on someone we meet in the first 30 seconds after we have met them. These include those related to economic and education levels (“She looks like an MBA”); trustworthiness, social worthiness (“He’s the kind of guy I won’t have over at home”); level of sophistication, and economic, social, and moral heritage. Not convinced? A 1996-study titled Silent Messages by Albert Mehrabin, a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, discovered that 55 percent of the impact we make on others is a function of our appearance, 38 percent, our voice, and 7 percent, the content (or what we say).

“Every small cue counts,” says Satish Pradhan, the head of HR of the Tata Group. The appropriateness of dress and demeanour is one thing that most interviewers look for in a candidate, and it is a fairly easy thing to measure. What other things do recruiters look for? They try to see whether the candidate’s body language is in sync with what he (or she) is saying, “An interviewer will try and corroborate what a person says by reading his non-verbal conduct” says RP. Singh, Central Manager, HR. Philips. For instance, a person who avoids looking straight into the eyes of the interviewer is either unsure of what he is saying, or is lying. There are other things that seasoned interviewers look for: does the candidate sit still, or fidget? Does he shake his leg or twiddle his thumbs while speaking (a sure sign of nervousness)? How does he react to a stressful question? (If he flails his arms, stammers, or gets shifty eyed, he is not used to stress). And even if a person is able to fudge all these and land the job, the result is a zero-sum game: it is difficult to fudge behaviour forever, and the company will get rid of the person sooner than later once the truth is out.

For the person being interviewed, there is just one way out: to be himself or herself.  Last word: just improve your walk some. A few recruiters believe in seeing how candidates walk into and out of a room.

  1. a book on recruitment in the new millennium

  2. an analysis of the hiring procedures by a psychologist

  3. a psephologist's take on recruitment policies

  4. an article in a newspaper or magazine regarding GD/PIs for B. schools

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

This passage is directed at interviewees asking them to keep in mind some factors before going for an interview; it highlights different perspectives of recruiters when recruiting somebody. In this light, option (1) is a cogent answer. Nowhere in the passage, do we find any reference of the author being a psychologist or a psephologist; hence options (2) and (3) are ruled out. Option (4) is rejected as it covers college entrance, not about recruitments. Hence, option (1) is the answer.

Multiple choice

Which among the following statements is not true?

Directions: Read the following passage and then answer the question that follows:

PASSAGE – IV

Then I told him, “It’s the shoes, silly.” Of all recruitment filters this must be the strangest. Or is it? Speak to a journeyman recruiter about what puts her off someone she is interviewing, and the list that emerges is stranger still. “Overgrown nails, tight clothes, nasal hair, dandruff, a loud tie, louder socks, mini skirts, cleavage, tattoos…”.

Probe a little further and the list acquires a psychographic tinge: “Arrogance, obsequiousness, a know-it-all attitude, inability to listen …..“. Smart recruiters do not need too much time to look for these: the duration of the interview itself will do. Ask Dr. Yasho V. Verma, LG’s head of HR. “I never listen to what people have to say; it is far more important how they say it.” That statement should endear him to the proponents of the form-over-content school of thought.

There is enough scientific evidence to suggest that hiring decisions are based as much on form as on content. Social psychologists have estimated that we make up to 10 (value) judgments on someone we meet in the first 30 seconds after we have met them. These include those related to economic and education levels (“She looks like an MBA”); trustworthiness, social worthiness (“He’s the kind of guy I won’t have over at home”); level of sophistication, and economic, social, and moral heritage. Not convinced? A 1996-study titled Silent Messages by Albert Mehrabin, a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, discovered that 55 percent of the impact we make on others is a function of our appearance, 38 percent, our voice, and 7 percent, the content (or what we say).

“Every small cue counts,” says Satish Pradhan, the head of HR of the Tata Group. The appropriateness of dress and demeanour is one thing that most interviewers look for in a candidate, and it is a fairly easy thing to measure. What other things do recruiters look for? They try to see whether the candidate’s body language is in sync with what he (or she) is saying, “An interviewer will try and corroborate what a person says by reading his non-verbal conduct” says RP. Singh, Central Manager, HR. Philips. For instance, a person who avoids looking straight into the eyes of the interviewer is either unsure of what he is saying, or is lying. There are other things that seasoned interviewers look for: does the candidate sit still, or fidget? Does he shake his leg or twiddle his thumbs while speaking (a sure sign of nervousness)? How does he react to a stressful question? (If he flails his arms, stammers, or gets shifty eyed, he is not used to stress). And even if a person is able to fudge all these and land the job, the result is a zero-sum game: it is difficult to fudge behaviour forever, and the company will get rid of the person sooner than later once the truth is out.

For the person being interviewed, there is just one way out: to be himself or herself.  Last word: just improve your walk some. A few recruiters believe in seeing how candidates walk into and out of a room.

  1. Arrogance, bad listening skills and inappropriate dressing do not add value to the content of an interview.

  2. Informal ways do not always lead to success.

  3. In the present scenario, the adage, 'first impression is the last impression' is no longer valid.

  4. Appearances and exteriors during an interview are as important as the content.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

This line in the third paragraph 'Social psychologists have estimated that we make up to 10 (value) judgments on someone we meet in the first 30 seconds after we have met them' suggests the validity of the adage in option (3) till date. Therefore, option (3) is the answer as it is contrary to the passage.

Multiple choice
  1. 25 tigers were given new home

  2. Humans do not allow tigers to live

  3. 25 tigers were caught

  4. 25 new areas were developed for tigers to live

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

‘India's Project Tiger established (developed) over 25 tiger reserves’

Multiple choice
  1. To establish something new

  2. To give credit

  3. Human habitation is everywhere

  4. India has the largest population of tigers

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

‘The project was credited with tripling the number’.

Multiple choice
  1. It has become the largest in the world.

  2. 11% Tigers don’t like to live in forest.

  3. It has decreased and only 11% is left.

  4. It is degrading the tigers of India.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

‘only 11% of the original Indian tiger habitat remains (left)’

Multiple choice
  1. Tiny plants

  2. Animals

  3. Plants with animals living inside them

  4. Animals with plants living inside them

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The sixth sentence of the passage gives the answer. Corals are actually animals with plants living inside them.

Multiple choice
  1. Tigers die after falling

  2. The population of tigers had dropped

  3. Tigers had shown less interest in numbers

  4. Illegal hunting is not good for tigers

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

In the passage 'numbers had fallen down to about 1,400' tells about the decrease in the population of tigers over a period of time.

Multiple choice
  1. Habitat and nursery grounds to fisheries

  2. Their role in developing other communities

  3. Uncertain future due to human and ecological assaults

  4. Ecological research on reefs

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The trend refers to the uncertain future of coral reefs due to human and ecological assaults. The third and fourth sentences of the passage refer to this.