Reading Comprehension Questions

Multiple choice

What is the other list?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Although no one ever shows the other list, it is the other list that I have always been more inquisitive about. Why the other list is generally kept from public viewing is understandable, and why we must show greater inquisitiveness about the other list is equally understandable. You can never have a complete picture of things unless you have the other list before you and not many would want to give you the complete picture as it tends to giving themselves up. No one likes that.
But what is the other list anyway?  We have heard about the Schindler’s List. Although the list I have in my mind does not have anything to do with this List, this List too has something common in with the other list. This List too was neither shown, nor was seen until one stumbled upon it and made it public. Perhaps, no one had asked it to be shown, ostensibly because no one knew about its existence. Even if one were to ask for it, no one would have volunteered to show it for the same reason—it would have exposed him. No one liked to be exposed. Not even those who lived in the distant past and had not known of the present day machinations and manipulations. They also did not show it, rather pleaded ignorance about the existence of such a list. But the list always existed despite indications to the contrary. An astute politician would never flaunt such a list. Therefore getting to see the other list is not easy. But what is the other list in the first place and why am I making so much ado about it?
Well, the other list is the most important list of all lists that we know of. It is that list which can make or unmake many things, many dispensations and many regimes. It can bring about an earthquake; it can cause turmoil of far reaching consequences.
“It is the other list that I want to see, dear me! Where is the other list?” That is how the inquisitive man had asked him. Centuries ago, when boats were the only mode of conveyance for going from one place to another, this inquisitive man was approached by boatmen promising to ferry him across, flaunting their lists of those successfully ferried across to make fortune. Each boatman was eager to draw his attention, to enlist him as a customer. Each one of them had just one list to flaunt, asking him to see for himself and decide whether he would like to be ferried by this or that boatman. No one had the other list, the inquisitive man was sure. No one had ever asked for the other list. No one had therefore compiled the other list.
“What is that other list?”
“Listing the names of those who took your boat and perished!?” the inquisitive man demanded. Obviously, the list was not supplied. No one had such a list and no one supplied it either. And why should one? Who likes to dig his own grave? Certainly not the politicians, not the government of the day, or, for that matter, even the financial institutions. Anyone demanding such a list is unwelcome or those talking or alluding to it are untouchable. Such men are hounded out. Whether one shows it or not, the existence of such lists cannot be denied no matter how loudly one denies it. The boatmen also denied it and went their way leaving the inquisitive man masticating his unpleasant cud and to fend for himself. Customers will still come the boatman’s way, list or no list.
Very true, but inquisitive men will also be around, untouchable or otherwise. Because it is these inquisitive men who make or infuse some life into the decaying polity that is our mainstay today. The prime minister declared that he would have TADA replaced with some other Act; and even he would not supply the other list that could possibly tell us as to where things went wrong with TADA.
The list his government would make available would contain only those names that politically suit him and his government. Because the politician in him wants to win over a particular community so that he and his party remain in power. The other list which is withheld from public viewing could show to the world that it was his own ministers who had bungled the most. The other list must, accordingly, remain buried, lest it spills the beans. Obviously, the other list always contained unpleasant matters, not good for public consumption.
But it is because of the presence of these inquisitive men that we are able to ferret out the other list. If we have a semblance of democracy, it is because of our uncanny ability to bring out the other list from time to time. So, the next time a politician flaunts his list of achievements and solicits your support, insist on production of the other list. Democracy will survive. Long live the other list.

 

  1. The other list contains details of successes.

  2. The other list is the record of achievements offlaunted by governments.

  3. The other list is supposed to have the record of failures.

  4. The other list is a list of do's and don'ts.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

True. The other list is supposed to have records of failures which is why no one wants to show it.

Multiple choice

“Listing the names of those who took your boat and perished” in the context of passage means

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Although no one ever shows the other list, it is the other list that I have always been more inquisitive about. Why the other list is generally kept from public viewing is understandable, and why we must show greater inquisitiveness about the other list is equally understandable. You can never have a complete picture of things unless you have the other list before you and not many would want to give you the complete picture as it tends to giving themselves up. No one likes that.
But what is the other list anyway?  We have heard about the Schindler’s List. Although the list I have in my mind does not have anything to do with this List, this List too has something common in with the other list. This List too was neither shown, nor was seen until one stumbled upon it and made it public. Perhaps, no one had asked it to be shown, ostensibly because no one knew about its existence. Even if one were to ask for it, no one would have volunteered to show it for the same reason—it would have exposed him. No one liked to be exposed. Not even those who lived in the distant past and had not known of the present day machinations and manipulations. They also did not show it, rather pleaded ignorance about the existence of such a list. But the list always existed despite indications to the contrary. An astute politician would never flaunt such a list. Therefore getting to see the other list is not easy. But what is the other list in the first place and why am I making so much ado about it?
Well, the other list is the most important list of all lists that we know of. It is that list which can make or unmake many things, many dispensations and many regimes. It can bring about an earthquake; it can cause turmoil of far reaching consequences.
“It is the other list that I want to see, dear me! Where is the other list?” That is how the inquisitive man had asked him. Centuries ago, when boats were the only mode of conveyance for going from one place to another, this inquisitive man was approached by boatmen promising to ferry him across, flaunting their lists of those successfully ferried across to make fortune. Each boatman was eager to draw his attention, to enlist him as a customer. Each one of them had just one list to flaunt, asking him to see for himself and decide whether he would like to be ferried by this or that boatman. No one had the other list, the inquisitive man was sure. No one had ever asked for the other list. No one had therefore compiled the other list.
“What is that other list?”
“Listing the names of those who took your boat and perished!?” the inquisitive man demanded. Obviously, the list was not supplied. No one had such a list and no one supplied it either. And why should one? Who likes to dig his own grave? Certainly not the politicians, not the government of the day, or, for that matter, even the financial institutions. Anyone demanding such a list is unwelcome or those talking or alluding to it are untouchable. Such men are hounded out. Whether one shows it or not, the existence of such lists cannot be denied no matter how loudly one denies it. The boatmen also denied it and went their way leaving the inquisitive man masticating his unpleasant cud and to fend for himself. Customers will still come the boatman’s way, list or no list.
Very true, but inquisitive men will also be around, untouchable or otherwise. Because it is these inquisitive men who make or infuse some life into the decaying polity that is our mainstay today. The prime minister declared that he would have TADA replaced with some other Act; and even he would not supply the other list that could possibly tell us as to where things went wrong with TADA.
The list his government would make available would contain only those names that politically suit him and his government. Because the politician in him wants to win over a particular community so that he and his party remain in power. The other list which is withheld from public viewing could show to the world that it was his own ministers who had bungled the most. The other list must, accordingly, remain buried, lest it spills the beans. Obviously, the other list always contained unpleasant matters, not good for public consumption.
But it is because of the presence of these inquisitive men that we are able to ferret out the other list. If we have a semblance of democracy, it is because of our uncanny ability to bring out the other list from time to time. So, the next time a politician flaunts his list of achievements and solicits your support, insist on production of the other list. Democracy will survive. Long live the other list.

 

  1. giving names of those who perished because they took the boat

  2. giving names of those who perished because they did not takedespite having taken the boat

  3. failures of the service providers despite claiming infallible standards of service

  4. giving names of those who perished because the boat had many holes

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

True. Boat is a mere symbol. Most, if not all, service providers claim an infallible standard in providing service. Yet, the fact of the matter is-they still fail, and usually they conceal this fact from every prospective customer. This is what the writer is driving at. This is the most plausible answerNot true. No necessary link. Those who perished, perished irrespective of whether the boat they had taken perished or not.

Multiple choice

On reading of the opening paragraph, you get an impression

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Although no one ever shows the other list, it is the other list that I have always been more inquisitive about. Why the other list is generally kept from public viewing is understandable, and why we must show greater inquisitiveness about the other list is equally understandable. You can never have a complete picture of things unless you have the other list before you and not many would want to give you the complete picture as it tends to giving themselves up. No one likes that.
But what is the other list anyway?  We have heard about the Schindler’s List. Although the list I have in my mind does not have anything to do with this List, this List too has something common in with the other list. This List too was neither shown, nor was seen until one stumbled upon it and made it public. Perhaps, no one had asked it to be shown, ostensibly because no one knew about its existence. Even if one were to ask for it, no one would have volunteered to show it for the same reason—it would have exposed him. No one liked to be exposed. Not even those who lived in the distant past and had not known of the present day machinations and manipulations. They also did not show it, rather pleaded ignorance about the existence of such a list. But the list always existed despite indications to the contrary. An astute politician would never flaunt such a list. Therefore getting to see the other list is not easy. But what is the other list in the first place and why am I making so much ado about it?
Well, the other list is the most important list of all lists that we know of. It is that list which can make or unmake many things, many dispensations and many regimes. It can bring about an earthquake; it can cause turmoil of far reaching consequences.
“It is the other list that I want to see, dear me! Where is the other list?” That is how the inquisitive man had asked him. Centuries ago, when boats were the only mode of conveyance for going from one place to another, this inquisitive man was approached by boatmen promising to ferry him across, flaunting their lists of those successfully ferried across to make fortune. Each boatman was eager to draw his attention, to enlist him as a customer. Each one of them had just one list to flaunt, asking him to see for himself and decide whether he would like to be ferried by this or that boatman. No one had the other list, the inquisitive man was sure. No one had ever asked for the other list. No one had therefore compiled the other list.
“What is that other list?”
“Listing the names of those who took your boat and perished!?” the inquisitive man demanded. Obviously, the list was not supplied. No one had such a list and no one supplied it either. And why should one? Who likes to dig his own grave? Certainly not the politicians, not the government of the day, or, for that matter, even the financial institutions. Anyone demanding such a list is unwelcome or those talking or alluding to it are untouchable. Such men are hounded out. Whether one shows it or not, the existence of such lists cannot be denied no matter how loudly one denies it. The boatmen also denied it and went their way leaving the inquisitive man masticating his unpleasant cud and to fend for himself. Customers will still come the boatman’s way, list or no list.
Very true, but inquisitive men will also be around, untouchable or otherwise. Because it is these inquisitive men who make or infuse some life into the decaying polity that is our mainstay today. The prime minister declared that he would have TADA replaced with some other Act; and even he would not supply the other list that could possibly tell us as to where things went wrong with TADA.
The list his government would make available would contain only those names that politically suit him and his government. Because the politician in him wants to win over a particular community so that he and his party remain in power. The other list which is withheld from public viewing could show to the world that it was his own ministers who had bungled the most. The other list must, accordingly, remain buried, lest it spills the beans. Obviously, the other list always contained unpleasant matters, not good for public consumption.
But it is because of the presence of these inquisitive men that we are able to ferret out the other list. If we have a semblance of democracy, it is because of our uncanny ability to bring out the other list from time to time. So, the next time a politician flaunts his list of achievements and solicits your support, insist on production of the other list. Democracy will survive. Long live the other list.

 

  1. that there is casualness about the way the issue is tackled.

  2. that the author is merely making us inquisitive about what is to follow.

  3. that the author is stating something that does not have a serious overtone.

  4. that the author is writing for the sake of writing.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

There is apparent casualness about the way the issue is tackled and that seems to the intended way of dealing with the issue for drawing the attention of the reader.

Multiple choice

The third paragraph of the passage demonstrates

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Passage-3
Although no one ever shows the other list, it is the other list that I have always been more inquisitive about. Why the other list is generally kept from public viewing is understandable, and why we must show greater inquisitiveness about the other list is equally understandable. You can never have a complete picture of things unless you have the other list before you and not many would want to give you the complete picture as it tends to giving themselves up. No one likes that.
But what is the other list anyway?  We have heard about the Schindler’s List. Although the list I have in my mind does not have anything to do with this List, this List too has something common in with the other list. This List too was neither shown, nor was seen until one stumbled upon it and made it public. Perhaps, no one had asked it to be shown, ostensibly because no one knew about its existence. Even if one were to ask for it, no one would have volunteered to show it for the same reason—it would have exposed him. No one liked to be exposed. Not even those who lived in the distant past and had not known of the present day machinations and manipulations. They also did not show it, rather pleaded ignorance about the existence of such a list. But the list always existed despite indications to the contrary. An astute politician would never flaunt such a list. Therefore getting to see the other list is not easy. But what is the other list in the first place and why am I making so much ado about it?
Well, the other list is the most important list of all lists that we know of. It is that list which can make or unmake many things, many dispensations and many regimes. It can bring about an earthquake; it can cause turmoil of far reaching consequences.
“It is the other list that I want to see, dear me! Where is the other list?” That is how the inquisitive man had asked him. Centuries ago, when boats were the only mode of conveyance for going from one place to another, this inquisitive man was approached by boatmen promising to ferry him across, flaunting their lists of those successfully ferried across to make fortune. Each boatman was eager to draw his attention, to enlist him as a customer. Each one of them had just one list to flaunt, asking him to see for himself and decide whether he would like to be ferried by this or that boatman. No one had the other list, the inquisitive man was sure. No one had ever asked for the other list. No one had therefore compiled the other list.
“What is that other list?”
“Listing the names of those who took your boat and perished!?” the inquisitive man demanded. Obviously, the list was not supplied. No one had such a list and no one supplied it either. And why should one? Who likes to dig his own grave? Certainly not the politicians, not the government of the day, or, for that matter, even the financial institutions. Anyone demanding such a list is unwelcome or those talking or alluding to it are untouchable. Such men are hounded out. Whether one shows it or not, the existence of such lists cannot be denied no matter how loudly one denies it. The boatmen also denied it and went their way leaving the inquisitive man masticating his unpleasant cud and to fend for himself. Customers will still come the boatman’s way, list or no list.
Very true, but inquisitive men will also be around, untouchable or otherwise. Because it is these inquisitive men who make or infuse some life into the decaying polity that is our mainstay today. The prime minister declared that he would have TADA replaced with some other Act; and even he would not supply the other list that could possibly tell us as to where things went wrong with TADA.
The list his government would make available would contain only those names that politically suit him and his government. Because the politician in him wants to win over a particular community so that he and his party remain in power. The other list which is withheld from public viewing could show to the world that it was his own ministers who had bungled the most. The other list must, accordingly, remain buried, lest it spills the beans. Obviously, the other list always contained unpleasant matters, not good for public consumption.
But it is because of the presence of these inquisitive men that we are able to ferret out the other list. If we have a semblance of democracy, it is because of our uncanny ability to bring out the other list from time to time. So, the next time a politician flaunts his list of achievements and solicits your support, insist on production of the other list. Democracy will survive. Long live the other list.

  1. Writer's conviction about the efficacy of the other list.

  2. Writer's antipathy towards the lists of all kinds.

  3. Writer's hostility towards the other list

  4. Writer's belief that it is always helpful to take an informed decision when you have both negatives and positives of a thing.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Writer leaves absolutely no doubt about his conviction. He strongly believes that the other list is the ultimate thing. It is a powerful weapon of knowledge in your hand. This gives out the grey areas of the service providers which is why they would not like to part with it. An observant reader will be able to see the underlying principle of RTI Act in this conviction of the writer. This paragraph contains the kernel of the argument and is our answer.

Multiple choice
  1. Painter

  2. Manager

  3. Chef

  4. Architect

  5. Teacher

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

This is the correct answer.

Only two people sit between the architect and W. The doctor is not an immediate neighbour of the architect. The teacher is an immediate neighbour of both lawyer and the engineer ||| |---|---| | |ARCHITECT| |DOCTOR| | |W | - LAWYER| |ENGINEER|W - TEACHER|   U is not an immediate neighbour of P. V is not an immediate neighbour of the teacher. R is the immediate neighbour of the painter. P is not a painter. P sits third to the right of the architect.   ||| |---|---| |U|R- ARCHITECT| |DOCTOR|U PAINTER| |P|U - LAWYER| |ENGINEER|W- TEACHER|   Doctor and chef are immediate neighbours of each other. Neither P nor W is a doctor or a chef. The teacher sits second to the left of T. T is not an immediate neighbour of W.   ||| |---|---| |U - CHEF|R -  ARCHITECT| |V- DOCTOR|T- PAINTER| |P-| U - LAWYER| |ENGINEER|W- TEACHER| (Q is a chef, U may be an architect, but R is neither an engineer nor a lawyer. So, R is an architect. U is a lawyer because he cannot be an engineer, if he is so, then he is a neighbour of P. He should not be a neighbour of P. S remains and he is the engineer.)  ||| |---|---| |Q - CHEF |R - ARCHITECT| |V - DOCTOR|T - PAINTER| |P - MANAGER|U - LAWYER| |S - ENGINEER|W - TEACHER|

Multiple choice
  1. E

  2. A

  3. J

  4. F

  5. B

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Yes, it is the correct choice.

A, who is facing the center is sitting in between two people who are facing outside the center. I is sitting opposite to a person who is facing the same direction as that of I. I is facing the center.   ||| |---|---| | | | |------------->| | | <------------| <-----------I| |A--------->|---------->| E is not a neighbour of J and A. F, who is facing into the center and H is not neighbour of A. I is the neighbour of B and F ||| |---|---| | H<----------| ---------->J| | E------------->|< --------- F| |G <------------| <-----------I| |A--------->|---------->B|   E is sitting in between H and G.

Multiple choice
  1. Lawyer

  2. Doctor

  3. Manager

  4. Chef

  5. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

This is the correct answer.

Only two people sit between the architect and W. The doctor is not an immediate neighbour of the architect. The teacher is an immediate neighbour of both lawyer and the engineer ||| |---|---| | |ARCHITECT| |DOCTOR| | |W | - LAWYER| |ENGINEER|W - TEACHER|   U is not an immediate neighbour of P. V is not an immediate neighbour of the teacher. R is the immediate neighbour of the painter. P is not a painter. P sits third to the right of the architect.   ||| |---|---| |U|R- ARCHITECT| |DOCTOR|U PAINTER| |P|U - LAWYER| |ENGINEER|W- TEACHER|   Doctor and chef are immediate neighbours of each other. Neither P nor W is a doctor or a chef. The teacher sits second to the left of T. T is not an immediate neighbour of W.   ||| |---|---| |U - CHEF|R -  ARCHITECT| |V- DOCTOR|T- PAINTER| |P-| U - LAWYER| |ENGINEER|W- TEACHER| (Q is a chef, U may be an architect, but R is neither an engineer nor a lawyer. So, R is an architect. U is a lawyer because he cannot be an engineer, if he is so, then he is a neighbour of P. He should not be a neighbour of P. S remains and he is the engineer.)  ||| |---|---| |Q - CHEF |R - ARCHITECT| |V - DOCTOR|T - PAINTER| |P - MANAGER|U - LAWYER| |S - ENGINEER|W - TEACHER|

Multiple choice
  1. be a successful arbitrator when dissenting parties are rather reluctant to agree

  2. be helpful when not solicited

  3. tell a long story to people who have heard it many times before

  4. both (1) and (2)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

(3) Neither 1 nor 2 is unwanted; only 3 is.

Multiple choice
  1. bring a higher bid to a salesman who has just closed a deal

  2. disclose confidential information to others even when not solicited

  3. sing the praises of the bride when he goes to a wedding from the groom's side

  4. both (1) and (2)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

(1) Only (1) is at the wrong time and rather unwelcome.

Multiple choice
  1. because of lack of space voyages and artificial satellites

  2. by lack of the basic technique, that is, experimentation

  3. because there was a fear that the study of stars will bring evil

  4. since the knowledge was not found to be useful for day-to-day life

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Options 3 and 4 are irrelevant. It is 2 that will complete any science.

Multiple choice
  1. it requires lot of effort to rewrite the history, omitting the follies and misdeeds of the past

  2. the follies and misdeeds may be educative for after all a student is an adult in the making with a role to play in future

  3. it is a moot question as to who is to judge what are follies and misdeeds

  4. an assessment of the heroes is also a difficult one since the yardstick may not be acceptable to all

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

(2) They may have much to learn from the follies and misdeeds of the past.

Multiple choice
  1. The transport drivers who work within a fixed time frame feel the measure as a deliberate harassment.

  2. The travelling public is of the opinion that accidents are due to the system of corruption in granting driving licences to the unqualified.

  3. The imposition has not been effective since the highway patrols are totally inadequate in catching erring drivers.

  4. The reduction in death is more due to ban on movement of vehicles in the midnight and early hours of the day.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

(1) Why the protests? Possible harassment, particularly because the imposition “has not been administered effectively”

Multiple choice
  1. the authors are not familiar with the ways of life of people in such professions

  2. people are not impressed with the heroes and heroines who hail from the lower strata of social structure

  3. the authors have no patience to understand the nuances of these professions

  4. delineation of such characters requires a lot of care and a realistic approach

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

(1) One visualises something connected with one’s experiences.

Multiple choice
  1. we no longer believe in what old people said

  2. old myths and beliefs still hold their importance

  3. scientific research has established facts over old beliefs

  4. man is a slave of technology

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

0 0

Multiple choice
  1. shorter days

  2. sequence of day and night

  3. changes in intensity of sun's light

  4. different seasons

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

0 0