History ยท Civics Polity
Modern Indian History
8,125 Questions
Modern Indian History covers the colonial period, the freedom struggle, and key political movements. It includes questions on important leaders, the Indian National Congress, and social reforms. Mastering these questions is vital for clearing competitive government exams.
Indian freedom struggleIndian National CongressFamous historical leadersSocial reform movementsColonial administration
Modern Indian History Questions
What was the purpose of the Sylhet Referendum?
-
To determine whether Sylhet should join India or Pakistan
-
To determine whether Sylhet should remain an independent state
-
To determine whether Sylhet should join Burma
-
To determine whether Sylhet should join Bangladesh
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The Sylhet Referendum was held to determine whether the district of Sylhet, which was part of the province of Assam in British India, should join the newly independent Dominion of India or the newly independent Dominion of Pakistan.
Who was the leader of the pro-Pakistan movement in Sylhet?
-
Abul Hashim
-
Muhammad Ali Jinnah
-
Liaquat Ali Khan
-
Sher-e-Bangla A. K. Fazlul Huq
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Abul Hashim was the leader of the pro-Pakistan movement in Sylhet. He was a prominent politician and lawyer who served as the first Chief Minister of East Pakistan.
Who was the leader of the pro-India movement in Sylhet?
-
Gopinath Bordoloi
-
Jawaharlal Nehru
-
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
-
Mahatma Gandhi
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Gopinath Bordoloi was the leader of the pro-India movement in Sylhet. He was a prominent politician and lawyer who served as the first Chief Minister of Assam after independence.
What were the main arguments of the pro-Pakistan movement in Sylhet?
-
Sylhet had a Muslim-majority population
-
Sylhet had cultural and linguistic ties with East Bengal
-
Sylhet would be better off economically as part of Pakistan
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
The pro-Pakistan movement in Sylhet argued that Sylhet had a Muslim-majority population, that it had cultural and linguistic ties with East Bengal, and that it would be better off economically as part of Pakistan.
What were the main arguments of the pro-India movement in Sylhet?
-
Sylhet had a significant Hindu and Christian population
-
Sylhet had been part of Assam for centuries
-
Sylhet would be better off economically as part of India
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
The pro-India movement in Sylhet argued that Sylhet had a significant Hindu and Christian population, that it had been part of Assam for centuries, and that it would be better off economically as part of India.
What was the impact of the Sylhet Referendum on the partition of India?
-
It led to the creation of the new province of East Pakistan
-
It led to the creation of the new province of West Pakistan
-
It led to the creation of the new province of Bangladesh
-
It led to the creation of the new province of Assam
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The Sylhet Referendum led to the creation of the new province of East Pakistan, which became part of the newly independent Dominion of Pakistan.
What was the impact of the Sylhet Referendum on the people of Sylhet?
-
It led to communal violence between Hindus and Muslims
-
It led to the migration of Hindus from Sylhet to India
-
It led to the migration of Muslims from Sylhet to Pakistan
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
The Sylhet Referendum led to communal violence between Hindus and Muslims, the migration of Hindus from Sylhet to India, and the migration of Muslims from Sylhet to Pakistan.
What is the legacy of the Sylhet Referendum today?
-
It is a reminder of the complex and often violent history of the partition of India
-
It is a reminder of the importance of self-determination for peoples
-
It is a reminder of the need for peaceful resolution of conflicts
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
The Sylhet Referendum is a reminder of the complex and often violent history of the partition of India, the importance of self-determination for peoples, and the need for peaceful resolution of conflicts.
In which year did Sucheta Kripalani join the Indian National Congress?
B
Correct answer
Explanation
Sucheta Kripalani joined the Indian National Congress in 1936.
Sucheta Kripalani is remembered as a:
-
Freedom fighter
-
Social reformer
-
Politician
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Sucheta Kripalani is remembered as a freedom fighter, social reformer, and politician.
The Government of India Act of 1919 was a response to which event?
-
The Indian National Congress's demand for self-governance
-
The First World War
-
The Rowlatt Act
-
The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The Indian National Congress, led by leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Bal Gangadhar Tilak, had been advocating for greater self-governance in India. The Act was an attempt to address these demands.
The Government of India Act of 1919 was _ by the Indian National Congress.
-
Welcomed
-
Rejected
-
Partially accepted
-
Ignored
C
Correct answer
Explanation
The Indian National Congress welcomed some aspects of the Act, such as the introduction of dyarchy, but criticized others, such as the limited franchise and the retention of British control over key subjects.
The Government of India Act of 1919 was a _ step in the evolution of Indian democracy.
-
Landmark
-
Controversial
-
Progressive
-
Regressive
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The Act was a landmark step in the evolution of Indian democracy as it introduced a system of dyarchy and expanded the franchise, albeit limited.
The Government of India Act of 1919 was a _ response to the changing political landscape in India.
-
Proactive
-
Reactive
-
Neutral
-
Indifferent
B
Correct answer
Explanation
The Act was a reactive response to the growing demands for self-governance and the increasing influence of the Indian National Congress.
The Act was a _ attempt to address the grievances of the Indian people.
-
Genuine
-
Half-hearted
-
Insincere
-
Symbolic
B
Correct answer
Explanation
The Act was seen by many as a half-hearted attempt to address the grievances of the Indian people, as it fell short of their expectations for full self-governance.