Indian Law and Jurisprudence

Section 82 of the Indian Penal Code falls under the chapter of General Exception for the liability of offences under the Indian Penal Code. Section 82 of the Indian Penal Code provides that nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age. It is also termed as conclusive proof.

Article 20(2) of the Indian Constitution is known as "double jeopardy". "Double jeopardy" means that no person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.

Under Section 2 of the Indian Penal Code, every person is liable to punishment under the code for an offence. There are certain exceptions to the general rule of criminal liability.

The doctrine of part performance of contract is provided in Section 53 A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The procedure for seeking temporary injunction has been provided under Order XXXIX of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. An injunction being discretionary equitable relief cannot be granted when equally efficacious relief is obtainable in any other usual mode or proceeding.

A person claiming a right to appear before the Court may lodge a caveat under Section 148 A of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.

Anticipatory bail is where any person has reason to believe that he may be arrested on accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence, he may apply to the High Court or the Court of Session for a direction under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Proceure that in the event of such arrest, he shall be released on bail.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) originated in the United States, where courts allowed citizens to file cases matters of public concern even without personal injury. India adopted this concept in the 1980s to make justice more accessible to disadvantaged groups.

An assault or use of criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that it will their outrage their modesty shall be punished under Indian Penal code. In above facts, a lady IAS officer was slapped on her posterior at a gathering by the Director-General of Police, Punjab. Thus, he is guilty under section 354 of Indian Penal Code.

Statements I, II and IV constitute rape. 

Punishment for custodial rape, rape on a pregnant woman or rape on a woman who is under 16 years of age is provided under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. It provides rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend to imprisonment for life.

Criminal intimidation is said to occur when a person threatens another with any injury to anyone with intent to cause that person to do any act. Extortion is said to take place when a person intentionally puts any person in fear of injury and thereby, dishonestly induces the person to put in fear to deliver to any person, any property. Difference between criminal intimidation and extortion is that extortion includes delivery of property.

Option (1) is correct: Section 17 of the Limitation Act does not take this within its ambit. Option (2) is incorrect: Section 17 of the Limitation Act deals with not only an execution application but also a suit. Option (3) is incorrect: Section 17 of the Limitation Act deals with not only a suit but also an execution application. Option (4) is incorrect: Only option (1) is correct.

Option (1) is incorrect: Section 17 of the Limitation Act takes within its ambit concealments, fraud and mistakes. Option (2) is incorrect: Section 17 of the Limitation Act takes within its ambit concealments, fraud and mistakes.  Option (3) is incorrect: Section 17 of the Limitation Act takes within its ambit concealments, fraud and mistakes. Option (4) is correct: Section 17 of the Limitation Act takes within its ambit concealments, fraud and mistakes.

Option (1) is incorrect: In a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, the court cannot adjudicate on the title. Option (2) is incorrect: In a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, the court cannot direct the defendant(s) to remove the structure. Option (3) is incorrect: In a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, the court cannot permit the plaintiff to pull down the structure. Option (4) is correct: The court cannot do any of the above acts.