English Language

English Reading Comprehension

3,503 Questions

English reading comprehension questions assess the ability to understand, analyze, and interpret written passages. Formats include paragraph rearrangement, cloze tests, and fact finding from text. Regular practice is essential for scoring well in the English sections of banking, SSC, and railway exams.

Passage based inferenceParagraph rearrangementCloze test fillingVocabulary replacementReading accuracy tests

English Reading Comprehension Questions

Multiple choice

What is the central point made out in the passage?

Directions: The short passage below is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.

Many of you have long experienced in your manufacturing operations the advantages of substantial, well-contrived, and well-executed machinery.
Experience has also shown you the difference of the results between mechanism which is    neat, clean, well arranged, and always in a high state of repair; and that which is allowed to be dirty, in disorder, and without the means of preventing unnecessary friction, and which therefore becomes, and works, much out of repair. In the first case the whole economy and management are good, every operation proceeds with ease, order, and success.
In the last, the reverse must follow, and dissatisfaction among all the agents and instruments interested or occupied in the general process, which cannot fail to create great loss.
If, then, due care as to the state of your inanimate machines can produce such beneficial results, what may not be expected if you devote equal attention to your vital machines, which are far more wonderfully constructed?
When you shall acquire a right knowledge of these, of their curious mechanism, of their self-adjusting powers; when the proper mainspring shall be applied to their various movements— you will become conscious of their real value, and you will readily be induced to turn your thoughts more frequently from your inanimate to your living machines; and you will discover that the latter may be easily trained and directed to procure a large increase of pecuniary gain, while you may also derive from them a high and substantial satisfaction.

  1. Co-ordination among different organs in our body and hygienic diet is the secret of a healthy being.

  2. Good and effective management is important for successful operating mechanisms within an organisation.

  3. Harmonization and order among individuals of the society would create a better society.

  4. Well-contrived and well preserved machinery results in ordered and satisfied mechanism whereas unnecessary friction in machinery causes disorder among all the agents in the mechanism.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

By living machines, the author means individuals or human beings that are a part of the society. “The latter may be easily trained” provides the clue that the author emphasizes on the individuals as they can be easily trained. Hence, (3) is the answer.

Multiple choice
  1. Death is the truth of life.

  2. We suffer when we are not in tune with ourselves.

  3. When we are not in meditation, we are separated from our existence and that is our suffering.

  4. Goals provide the will to meaning.

  5. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

(3) is the answer.

Multiple choice
  1. Juliette Low, a deaf woman, used determination and persistence to spread Girl Scout troops all over the world.

  2. Juliette Low, a deaf woman, was very bumptious and always got what she wanted.

  3. Juliette Low, a deaf woman, traveled to many different places in her life time but ended up back in Savannah.

  4. Without Juliette, the Girl Scouts would still only be a British phenomenon.

  5. Despite being deaf and dumb, Juliette Low played an important role in the Girl Guides movement.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

 The main idea of the story is that Juliette's determination made Girls Scout troops possible. The correct answer is therefore (1).

Multiple choice
  1. liberation

  2. appraisal

  3. rejection

  4. repudiation

  5. evaluation

  6. salvation

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

(1) This is incorrect as the sentence is focused upon the role of cognitive approaches in rational process. Hence, 'liberation' of sciences is the wrong term in context of the sentence. (2) This is correct as the sentence talks about the role of cognitive approaches and rational process. Rationality demands 'appraisal' of the given information. Also, it has a similar word in 'evaluation'. (3) This is incorrect as the rational & cognitive approaches would seek to validate information. 'Rejection' and 'repudiation' give an unwanted negative tone to the sentence. (4) This is incorrect as the rational & cognitive approaches would seek to validate information. 'Repudiation' and 'rejection' give an unwanted negative tone to the sentence. (5) This is correct as the sentence talks about the role of cognitive approaches and rational process. Rationality demands 'evaluation' of the given information. Also, it has a similar word in 'appraisal'. (6) This is incorrect as the sentence is focused upon the role of cognitive approaches in rational process. Hence, 'salvation' or 'liberation' of sciences is the wrong term in context of the sentence.

Multiple choice

The author's use of the phrase 'indicating something else also' in the 3rd paragraph, implies most likely which of the following?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

In a major step toward helping paralytic victims walk again, Duke University researchers have announced that they had proved monkeys can use their brainpower to control the walking patterns of robots.

The investigators implanted Idoya, a rhesus monkey, with electrodes which gathered signals from her brain's motor and sensory cortex cells as she ambled along on a specially built child-size treadmill. The electrodes recorded the cells' responses as the monkey walked on the treadmill at different speeds; simultaneously, sensors on Idoya's legs tracked their patterns of movement. The information was transmitted real time from their lab in Durham, to control the commands of a humanoid robot in Kyoto, Japan.

Through the electrodes in her brain, the researchers discovered that some neurons fire at different phases and frequencies, depending on their role in the process. During the experiment, the robot continued to move for several minutes after Idoya stopped strolling on her treadmill indicating something else also.

The team’s goal is to finally enable real-time direct interfaces between a brain and electronic and mechanical devices that could be used to restore sensory and motor functions lost through injury or disease. The team hopes that one day soon, they will also master sufficient syntax to talk back to the brain, which would enable them, for instance, to build a human prosthetic arm laden with sensors to send tactile feedback into the somatosensory cortex of its user.

The experiment in monkey-to-robotic motion is the latest in a long series of studying the primate brain's ability to stimulate robotic arms through neural signals. In 2000 Nicolelis and his colleagues described how they had reliably translated the raw electrical brain activity of an owl monkey named Belle into signals that successfully directed the actions of robotic arms based both at Duke and at an MIT lab 965 kilometers away in Cambridge. Belle's tiny hand moved a joystick left or right to correspond with a horizontal series of lights on a display panel in a Duke lab; both robot arms followed suit.

A few years later, the team listened in on brain signals generated by a rhesus monkey named Aurora using a joystick to play a video game and translated them into commands for a mechanical arm to duplicate the motions. Aurora was ultimately able to move a robotic arm sans the joystick, using only her thoughts, an experiment that the team believes addresses fundamental questions about how brain circuits operate.

  1. The robot kept on moving despite the apparent absence of any signals. This proves that it has a brain of its own.

  2. Despite the apparent stoppage of Idoya's movement, the neurons firing in her brain kept on sending signals for certain movements to the robot, which made it move.

  3. The apparent stoppage of Idoya's movement can be attributed to the fact the neurons stopped firing in her brain while the robot kept receiving wrong signals.

  4. Even in the absence of physical movement by Idoya, the neurons in her brain were firing.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Option (1) is not a wise choice as it talks of the robot having a brain of its own. This is certainly not the goal of the researchers, which they want to prove. A robot does have a computer inside it. In fact, this is a given. Option (3) is again wrong because it is impossible for the robot to receive a signal if it has not been sent by the monkey's brain. Option (4) lies beyond the logical domain of the passage and is not supported by it. Pay careful attention to the italicized words, which help us arrive at the correct answer, option (2). Option (5) is obviously stated and does not indicate 'something else'. Option (2) Through the electrodes in Idoya's brain, researchers found that certain neurons fire at different phases and frequencies, depending on their role in the process. During the experiment, the robot continued to move for several minutes after Idoya stopped strolling on her treadmill indicating something else also.

Multiple choice

What is the function of the fourth paragraph in relation to the passage as a whole?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

In a major step toward helping paralytic victims walk again, Duke University researchers have announced that they had proved monkeys can use their brainpower to control the walking patterns of robots.

The investigators implanted Idoya, a rhesus monkey, with electrodes which gathered signals from her brain's motor and sensory cortex cells as she ambled along on a specially built child-size treadmill. The electrodes recorded the cells' responses as the monkey walked on the treadmill at different speeds; simultaneously, sensors on Idoya's legs tracked their patterns of movement. The information was transmitted real time from their lab in Durham, to control the commands of a humanoid robot in Kyoto, Japan.

Through the electrodes in her brain, the researchers discovered that some neurons fire at different phases and frequencies, depending on their role in the process. During the experiment, the robot continued to move for several minutes after Idoya stopped strolling on her treadmill indicating something else also.

The team’s goal is to finally enable real-time direct interfaces between a brain and electronic and mechanical devices that could be used to restore sensory and motor functions lost through injury or disease. The team hopes that one day soon, they will also master sufficient syntax to talk back to the brain, which would enable them, for instance, to build a human prosthetic arm laden with sensors to send tactile feedback into the somatosensory cortex of its user.

The experiment in monkey-to-robotic motion is the latest in a long series of studying the primate brain's ability to stimulate robotic arms through neural signals. In 2000 Nicolelis and his colleagues described how they had reliably translated the raw electrical brain activity of an owl monkey named Belle into signals that successfully directed the actions of robotic arms based both at Duke and at an MIT lab 965 kilometers away in Cambridge. Belle's tiny hand moved a joystick left or right to correspond with a horizontal series of lights on a display panel in a Duke lab; both robot arms followed suit.

A few years later, the team listened in on brain signals generated by a rhesus monkey named Aurora using a joystick to play a video game and translated them into commands for a mechanical arm to duplicate the motions. Aurora was ultimately able to move a robotic arm sans the joystick, using only her thoughts, an experiment that the team believes addresses fundamental questions about how brain circuits operate.

  1. It represents the essence of the entire paragraph while the rest is only a description of how the researchers are doing it.

  2. It represents the central idea of entire paragraph while the rest is doing nothing to either counter or support it.

  3. It is an unnecessary comment having very little relation with what follows or precedes it.

  4. It represents a far-fetched idea, not-so-easily actionable in near future.

  5. It is basically an attempt at preparing the reader for the contents that follow in the next paragraph.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Option (1) is the best one as not only is the paragraph describing the major goal behind the experiment, but the rest of the passage also gives us findings which go on to support the idea of easy achievability of the goal. Option (2) is wrong as the rest of the passage does support it to a great extent. Option (3) is irrelevant as it is very much in place here, for it addresses some aspects of the same issue. Option (4) talks of the idea being far-fetched, which does not seem to be true here. It is a distinct possibility, given the weight of evidence here. Option (5) is factually wrong as the next paragraph following it addresses a very different aspect.

Multiple choice

Which of the following is / are NOT correct in the context of this passage?

  1. Fundamentally speaking, there appears to be great similarity at the functional level between the observations made in both the Bell and the Idoya cases.
  2. The Aurora experiment proves that thoughts can, on their own, enable robotic movement if the relevant signals duly reach the recipient part even in the absence of actual physical contact.
  3. It is only the signals that enable particular movements and it is the neurons that generate these signals.
  4. Theoretically speaking at least, one should be able to enjoy music or dance even if the relevant signals are not sent to the recipient.

    Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

    In a major step toward helping paralytic victims walk again, Duke University researchers have announced that they had proved monkeys can use their brainpower to control the walking patterns of robots.

    The investigators implanted Idoya, a rhesus monkey, with electrodes which gathered signals from her brain's motor and sensory cortex cells as she ambled along on a specially built child-size treadmill. The electrodes recorded the cells' responses as the monkey walked on the treadmill at different speeds; simultaneously, sensors on Idoya's legs tracked their patterns of movement. The information was transmitted real time from their lab in Durham, to control the commands of a humanoid robot in Kyoto, Japan.

    Through the electrodes in her brain, the researchers discovered that some neurons fire at different phases and frequencies, depending on their role in the process. During the experiment, the robot continued to move for several minutes after Idoya stopped strolling on her treadmill indicating something else also.

    The team’s goal is to finally enable real-time direct interfaces between a brain and electronic and mechanical devices that could be used to restore sensory and motor functions lost through injury or disease. The team hopes that one day soon, they will also master sufficient syntax to talk back to the brain, which would enable them, for instance, to build a human prosthetic arm laden with sensors to send tactile feedback into the somatosensory cortex of its user.

    The experiment in monkey-to-robotic motion is the latest in a long series of studying the primate brain's ability to stimulate robotic arms through neural signals. In 2000 Nicolelis and his colleagues described how they had reliably translated the raw electrical brain activity of an owl monkey named Belle into signals that successfully directed the actions of robotic arms based both at Duke and at an MIT lab 965 kilometers away in Cambridge. Belle's tiny hand moved a joystick left or right to correspond with a horizontal series of lights on a display panel in a Duke lab; both robot arms followed suit.

    A few years later, the team listened in on brain signals generated by a rhesus monkey named Aurora using a joystick to play a video game and translated them into commands for a mechanical arm to duplicate the motions. Aurora was ultimately able to move a robotic arm sans the joystick, using only her thoughts, an experiment that the team believes addresses fundamental questions about how brain circuits operate.

  1. 1, 2

  2. 3, 4

  3. 1 Only

  4. 2, 3

  5. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

Both these cases illustrate that it is possible for appropriate brain signals to initiate movement at the end of the recipient. Thus choice (1) is correct as is (2). In fact this is very clearly stated in the last few lines of the passage. Choice (3) can be reasonably deduced from all these experiments in that even while actual physical movement was not there, brain signals were able to generate movement. It would be reasonable to believe the truth of choice (4) because if it can be true of limb movements, it can be equally true of other activities too. Hence all the choices given here are correct. Since none of them is wrong, the best answer would be (5). Answer: (5)

Multiple choice

Which of the following is most nearly CORRECT in he context of the above passage?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations - novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements. Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families - 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.

  1. High risk families often have a male carrying a sporadic mutation leading to autism.

  2. An individual having a functional disruption in a single gene, because the other copy has been deleted, is a very common occurrence.

  3. The unified genetic theory of autism combines elements from two different theories and gives an integrated picture.

  4. In case of families with multiple affected members, the males have a greater risk of being autistic as compared to females.

  5. Families with three or more children are at greater risk of having an autistic child.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Option (1) is wrong as it is the females that have a greater chance of getting the disease in such cases, according to the passage. Option (2) is again unjustified in that the total number of such cases does not exceed 10 percent, which does account for the phrase, a very common occurrence in the option. Option (3) runs contrary to the passage, as Wigler has only given one theory incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous factors. So there are no theories here. Option (5) makes too sweeping a statement. “He found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder”. Hence, option (4) is the best one.

Multiple choice

Which of the following purposes is served by the first paragraph in relation to the passage as a whole?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations - novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements. Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families - 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.

  1. It sums up a major point of discussion, which is being explained by the rest of the passage.

  2. It sums up a major point of discussion, with the rest of the passage trying to explain why the efforts to decode autism have been unsuccessful.

  3. It discusses Wigler’s work and how it has been instrumental in accounting for genetic basis of autism.

  4. It highlights a major point i.e. females carry autism more frequently and the rest of the passages discusses the reasons for it.

  5. It highlights a major unanswered question in autism research and the rest of the passage is again silent on it.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The failure of efforts to decode the genetic basis of autism is only one of the many points being made by the writer. Hence option (2) is definitely wrong here. The opening paragraph does talk about Wigler’s work but nowhere does it suggest that his work has been instrumental in this regard. Rather, it has got mixed results; there is nothing conclusive or final in this regard. Hence, option (3) is not justified here. Option (4) goes contrary to the contents of the first paragraph, which says that it is much commoner among males rather than in females. There is no question given in the first paragraph at all. So option (5) is wrong ab initio. Hence, option (1) is the best possible under given circumstances.

Multiple choice

Which of the following could have been the most suitable title for the above passage?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Autism has a strong genetic component: With one identical twin autistic, the other has a 70 percent chance of having it, a risk 10 times that of fraternal twins. Yet great, unsuccessful effort has been spent looking for its genetics. To Wigler, the key lies in spontaneous mutations - novel alterations in the parental germ line of the offspring. Last year he formed a controversial theory for it. It suggests that females, who develop autism with a 1/4th frequency with which males do, may carry the genetic profile for it.

Wigler attributes the failure of conventional studies to their studies on families with more than one autistic child to search for differences in one genetic base. These differences could be any alteration in a base called SNPs.  Uncovering SNPs shared by affected people would uncover high-risk people. The problem is locating the same target: they have implicated loci on 20 of the 23 human chromosomal pairs.

In his first autistic research, Wigler, with Sebat, tried to determine the role of spontaneous mutations, called copy number variations. Before human genome sequencing, researchers thought an individual always had two copies of a gene. In 2004, the team showed that even in healthy individuals, they could go missing from (or be added to) the genome via genetic rearrangements. Studies on families with only one autistic member showed that up to 10 percent of non-inherited autism cases could be caused by these rearrangements. They found that the structural events were primarily deletions, leaving individuals with only one copy of a particular gene and leading, sometimes, to its functional disruption.

Later, Wigler unveiled a unified genetic theory, which he cobbled together by examining families with multiple autistic individuals and incorporating both hereditary and spontaneous events. Focusing on families with the first two children affected, he found that third-born male children have a 50 percent risk of acquiring the disorder, whereas the risk for third-born girls is closer to 20 percent. From there, Wigler developed a two-tiered hypothesis: The majority fall into the low-risk category, having spontaneous mutation. Contrarily, high-risk families - 25 percent of all, manifest the disease when an unaffected individual, mostly female, carries a sporadic mutation. In case of a male, the chances are roughly half.

Although Wigler’s model is seen as a simpler way to view the genetics of autism, others find it incomplete. Critics note that it does not explain observations of families with an autistic child in which either second- or third-degree relatives are also affected or in which first-degree relatives show mild symptoms. And the model fails to explain why girls do not get autism as frequently as boys. Wigler believes that more data might help prove him. For instance, the girl-boy discrepancy could be explained if the genetic modifiers are sex-specific, an effect that might become apparent if researchers look at cases in which a normal mother has an autistic daughter.

  1. Autistic Research: Some New Trends

  2. Wigler’s Work on Autism: Some Unanswered Questions

  3. The Genetic Basis of Autism: Wigler’s Work

  4. The Failure of Conventional Studies on Autism

  5. How Spontaneous Mutations Cause Autism

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Option (1) talks of some new trends, while the passage discusses only one trend: the genetics of autism. Hence, it is not justified Option (2) hints at some unanswered questions which basically refers to the critics’ viewpoint. In fact, it does not tell the whole story, it is only part of it. Not every comprehensive answer, and is therefore, rejected. Option (3) is the best one as it sums up nicely the idea of Wigler’s work on genetic basis of autism being the focus of the entire discussion. Option (4) again alludes to a secondary aspect raised by Wigler, but it does incorporate the entire passage. Option (5) ignores everything else and focuses only on spontaneous mutations. In order to be correct, it has to include something more.

Multiple choice
  1. skeptical

  2. analytical

  3. pessimistic

  4. hopeful

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Tone is analytical because the passage analyses various reasons which slowed down the completion of the proposed project.

Multiple choice
  1. lack

  2. supply

  3. scarcity

  4. void

  5. want

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

You are constrained by lack of something. So, the correct answer is option 1 (lack).

Multiple choice
  1. lack

  2. supply

  3. scarcity

  4. void

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

You are constrained by lack of something. So, the correct answer is option 1 (lack).

Multiple choice
  1. gigantically

  2. slowly

  3. slightly

  4. impressively

  5. needlessly

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The latter part of the sentence indicates that we are talking about growth. So, a positive word is required. The correct answer is 'impressively'.

Multiple choice
  1. gigantically

  2. slowly

  3. slightly

  4. impressively

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The latter part of the sentence indicates that we are talking about growth. So, a positive word is required. The correct answer is 'impressively'.