English Language

English Reading Comprehension

3,503 Questions

English reading comprehension questions assess the ability to understand, analyze, and interpret written passages. Formats include paragraph rearrangement, cloze tests, and fact finding from text. Regular practice is essential for scoring well in the English sections of banking, SSC, and railway exams.

Passage based inferenceParagraph rearrangementCloze test fillingVocabulary replacementReading accuracy tests

English Reading Comprehension Questions

Multiple choice

Famous people can be used by the business to garner huge cash fows.

Real Madrid had great players, but that’s not enough in today’s world. It needed someone who could bring sponsors to their stadium. It needed someone who could charm and entertain the spectators with his skills on the field. It needed David Beckham and didn’t hesitate to pay a huge price for him. Real Madrid’s revenues from club merchandise (Shirts, Caps et al) jumped 67 per cent in Beckham’s first season alone. Suddenly, Real Madrid started earning more from ticket sales, television deals and other promotional activities. Its overall commercial income, which includes money deals from sponsors like Adidas, Pepsi et al now stands at pounds 80 million a year. When Beckham was with Manchester United, it was the richest club; today it’s Real Madrid. This is the “Beckham Effect” and marketers & merchandisers are loving it.

Yao Ming, the very popular Chinese basketball player, was purchased by an American basketball club. The reason? They had no reach or influence in the Asian market and Ming could help them get it, for soon after Ming’s transfer to NBA (National Basketball Association of America) opened merchandise stores all over Asia. Looking at NBA’s success, Seattle Mariners purchased Japanese National Baseball player Ichiro. Tourist flow from Japan has significantly increased to Seattle since then. Not to mention the fact that Ichiro merchandise happens to be one of the top selling merchandise in the league.
  1. Yes

  2. No

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The passage discusses how businesses use famous people to increase revenue and influence. The text provides multiple examples, such as Real Madrid with David Beckham, to support this claim.

Multiple choice
  1. self knowledge

  2. knowledge gained of interaction

  3. bookish knowledge

  4. experiential learning

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The author mentions gathering information through small-session meetings with executives in various regions. This implies that the insights are derived from direct interaction and discussion rather than theoretical or bookish sources.

Multiple choice
  1. Damage

  2. Destruction

  3. Both 1 and 2

  4. Desolation

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In the context of the passage, the 'protect the assets' approach could be 'devastating' (causing severe damage or destruction) in a modern, competitive environment.

Multiple choice

Directions: According to the passage, what is the meaning of merchandise?

Real Madrid had great players, but that’s not enough in today’s world. It needed someone who could bring sponsors to their stadium. It needed someone who could charm and entertain the spectators with his skills on the field. It needed David Beckham and didn’t hesitate to pay a huge price for him. Real Madrid’s revenues from club merchandise (Shirts, Caps et al) jumped 67 per cent in Beckham’s first season alone. Suddenly, Real Madrid started earning more from ticket sales, television deals and other promotional activities. Its overall commercial income, which includes money deals from sponsors like Adidas, Pepsi et al now stands at pounds 80 million a year. When Beckham was with Manchester United, it was the richest club; today it’s Real Madrid. This is the “Beckham Effect” and marketers & merchandisers are loving it.

Yao Ming, the very popular Chinese basketball player, was purchased by an American basketball club. The reason? They had no reach or influence in the Asian market and Ming could help them get it, for soon after Ming’s transfer to NBA (National Basketball Association of America) opened merchandise stores all over Asia. Looking at NBA’s success, Seattle Mariners purchased Japanese National Baseball player Ichiro. Tourist flow from Japan has significantly increased to Seattle since then. Not to mention the fact that Ichiro merchandise happens to be one of the top selling merchandise in the league.
  1. Capital goods

  2. FMCG goods

  3. Accessories

  4. White goods

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In the context of the passage, merchandise refers to the products sold by the clubs, such as shirts and caps. Accessories is the closest category among the choices.

Multiple choice
  1. Forecaster

  2. Conjecture

  3. Surmise

  4. Professor

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

A prognosticator is someone who makes predictions about the future. Forecaster is a direct synonym.

Multiple choice

Which of the following statements is true in the context of the passage?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

The productivity figures represent the number of machines per year produced at the plant in an average year during the late 1990s divided by the total manpower associated with that plant including both direct and indirect labour. All design staff and all sales and service staff are excluded. All managerial and supervisory staff are included. It might be expected that production volumes per man of the smaller type should be expected to be about double that of the medium type in a plant of equal productivity, but this ratio is a crude estimate and should be applied cautiously. If we accept this crude estimate for the appropriate correction factor, then the range between the maximum of 2 (smaller machines) and the minimum of 0.15 (medium machines) indicates a corrected ratio between the maximum and minimum productivity levels.

The figures for Taiwan which relate to standard machines are 2.6 (medium machines) and 5 (smaller machines) respectively. In the latter case, a high proportion of components are bought in. If, once again, we use the crude correction factor of 2 for machine size, then the ratio between the lowest Taiwanese score and the highest Indian score is a factor. This ratio should be compared to the corresponding ratio in wage rates; a comparison between the hourly rate paid to qualified machinists in the two countries suggests a wage ratio of about 6:1 for Taiwan relative to India at current exchange rates.

Now another aspect of the complete scenario: imports.

Today the import duty on a complete machine is 30% for all practical purpose, whereas the import duty on raw materials and components ranges from 35.85%. The story does not end here. After paying such high import duties on component, once a machine is made, it suffers excise duty from 5% – 10% (including on the customs duty already paid). At the time of sale, the machine tools suffer further taxation, i.e. central sales tax or State sales taxes which range from 4% – 16%. This much for the tax angle. Another factor, which pushes the cost of manufacture of machine tools, is the very high rate of interest payable to banks ranging up to 22%, as against 4%–7% prevailing in advanced countries.

The production of machine tools in India being not of the same scale as it is in other countries, the price which India's machine tool builders have to pay for components is more or less based on pattern of high pricing applicable to the prices of spares.

The machines tool industry in India has an enviable record of very quick technology absorption, assimilation and development. There are a number of success stories about how machine tool builders were of help at the most critical times. It will be a pity, in fact a tragedy, if we allow this industry to die and disappear from the scene.

It is to be noted that India is at least 6500 km away from any dependable source of supply of machine tools. The Government of India has always given a great deal of importance to the development of small scale and medium scale industries. This industry has also performed pretty well. Today, they are in need of help from India's machine tool industry to enable them to produce quality components at reduced costs. Is it anybody's case that the needs of the fragile sector (which needs tender care) will be met from 6500 km away?

Then, what is it that the industry request from the Government? It wants a level playing field. In fact, all of us must have a deep introspection and recognize the fact that the machine tool industry has a very special place in the country from the point of strategic and vital interest of the nation. Most important, it requests for the Government's consideration and understanding. It is therefore high time that the government gives the due attention to this industry which has a good potential.

  1. India's machine tool industry has a praiseworthy record of performance.

  2. In critical times, the machine tool builders allowed the industry to perish.

  3. In the case of machines, the excise duty is levied only on the cost price.

  4. India's quantum of production of machine tools is more than that of the other advanced countries.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Correct answer is (1). Options (2) and (3) are incorrect because they have no reference available in the passage. Option (4) is incorrect because except for the term 'not of the same scale' nothing is available for reader to infer it more or less. Option (1) has support in the line 'an enviable record'. Hence, it is the correct answer.

Multiple choice

Which of the following options is the principal focus of the content of the passage?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

The productivity figures represent the number of machines per year produced at the plant in an average year during the late 1990s divided by the total manpower associated with that plant including both direct and indirect labour. All design staff and all sales and service staff are excluded. All managerial and supervisory staff are included. It might be expected that production volumes per man of the smaller type should be expected to be about double that of the medium type in a plant of equal productivity, but this ratio is a crude estimate and should be applied cautiously. If we accept this crude estimate for the appropriate correction factor, then the range between the maximum of 2 (smaller machines) and the minimum of 0.15 (medium machines) indicates a corrected ratio between the maximum and minimum productivity levels.

The figures for Taiwan which relate to standard machines are 2.6 (medium machines) and 5 (smaller machines) respectively. In the latter case, a high proportion of components are bought in. If, once again, we use the crude correction factor of 2 for machine size, then the ratio between the lowest Taiwanese score and the highest Indian score is a factor. This ratio should be compared to the corresponding ratio in wage rates; a comparison between the hourly rate paid to qualified machinists in the two countries suggests a wage ratio of about 6:1 for Taiwan relative to India at current exchange rates.

Now another aspect of the complete scenario: imports.

Today the import duty on a complete machine is 30% for all practical purpose, whereas the import duty on raw materials and components ranges from 35.85%. The story does not end here. After paying such high import duties on component, once a machine is made, it suffers excise duty from 5% – 10% (including on the customs duty already paid). At the time of sale, the machine tools suffer further taxation, i.e. central sales tax or State sales taxes which range from 4% – 16%. This much for the tax angle. Another factor, which pushes the cost of manufacture of machine tools, is the very high rate of interest payable to banks ranging up to 22%, as against 4%–7% prevailing in advanced countries.

The production of machine tools in India being not of the same scale as it is in other countries, the price which India's machine tool builders have to pay for components is more or less based on pattern of high pricing applicable to the prices of spares.

The machines tool industry in India has an enviable record of very quick technology absorption, assimilation and development. There are a number of success stories about how machine tool builders were of help at the most critical times. It will be a pity, in fact a tragedy, if we allow this industry to die and disappear from the scene.

It is to be noted that India is at least 6500 km away from any dependable source of supply of machine tools. The Government of India has always given a great deal of importance to the development of small scale and medium scale industries. This industry has also performed pretty well. Today, they are in need of help from India's machine tool industry to enable them to produce quality components at reduced costs. Is it anybody's case that the needs of the fragile sector (which needs tender care) will be met from 6500 km away?

Then, what is it that the industry request from the Government? It wants a level playing field. In fact, all of us must have a deep introspection and recognize the fact that the machine tool industry has a very special place in the country from the point of strategic and vital interest of the nation. Most important, it requests for the Government's consideration and understanding. It is therefore high time that the government gives the due attention to this industry which has a good potential.

  1. Exorbitant sales tax for the Indian machine tool industry.

  2. Strategy of development of technology most helpful to the machine tool industry in India.

  3. Reduction in rate of interest on loans to machine industry.

  4. Indian machine tool industry and its vital role in the country's development.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Correct answer is (4). Options (1), (2) and (3) have support in the passage i.e. contain sufficient evidence of author's support to these issues to help the machine tool industry. But the central theme of this passage is to explain the Indian machine tool industry and its vital role in the country' s development. Therefore, option (4) is the correct choice for the question.

Multiple choice

A suitable title of the passage would be

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

I suppose their little bones have years ago been lost among the stones and winds of those high glacial pastures. I suppose their leathers blew eventually into the piles of tumbleweed beneath the straggling cattle fences and rotted there in the mountain snows along with dead steers and all the other things that drift to an end in the corners of the wire. I do not quite know why I should be thinking of birds over the New York Times at breakfast, particularly the birds of my youth half a continent away. It is a funny thing what the brain will do with memories and how it will treasure them and finally bring them into odd juxtapositions with other things, as though it wanted to make a design, or get some meaning out of them, whether you want it or not, or even see it.

It used to seem marvelous to me, but I read now that there are machines that can do these things in a small way, machines that can crawl about like animals, and that it may not be long now until do more things - maybe even make themselves – I saw that piece in the Times just now. And then they will, maybe – well, who knows - but you read about it more and more with no one raising any protest, and already they can add better than we and reach up and hear things through the dark and finger the guns over the night sky.

This is the new world that I read about at breakfast. This is the world that confronts me in my biological books and journals, until there are times when I sit quietly in my chair and try to hear the little purr of the cogs in my head and the tubes flaring and dying as the messages go through them and the circuits snap shut or open. This is the great age, make no mistake about it: the robot has been born somewhat appropriately along with the atom bomb, and the brain they say now is just another type of more complicated feedback system. The engineers have its basic principles worked out; it's mechanical, you know; nothing to get superstitious about; and man can always improve on nature once he gets the idea. Well, he’s got it all right and that’s why, I guess, that I sit here in my chair, with the article crunched in my hand, remembering those two birds and that blue mountain sunlight. There is another magazine article on my desk that reads “Machines Are Getting Smarter Every Day.” I don’t deny it, but I’ll still stick with the birds. It’s life I believe in, not machines.

Maybe you don’t believe there is any difference. A skeleton is all joints and pulleys, I’ll admit. And when man was in his simpler stages of machine building in the eighteenth century, he quickly saw the resemblances. “What.” wrote Hobbes, “is the heart but a spring, and the nerves but so many strings, and the joints but so many wheels, giving motion to the whole body?” Tinkering about in their shops it was inevitable in the end that men would see the world as a huge machine “subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines.”

The idea took on with a vengeance. Little automatons toured the country - dolls controlled by clockwork. Clocks described as little worlds were taken on tours by their designers. They were made up of moving figures, shifting scenes and other remarkable devices. The life of the cell was unknown. Man, whether he was conceived as possessing a soul or not, moved and jerked about like these tiny tippets. A human being thought of himself in terms of his own tools and implements. He had been fashioned like the puppets he produced and was only a more clever model made by a greater designer.

Then in the nineteenth century, the cell was discovered, and the single machine in its turn was found to be the product of millions of infinitesimal machines - the cells. Now, finally, the cell itself dissolves away into an abstract chemical machine and that into some intangible, inexpressible flow of energy. The secret seems to lurk all about, the wheels get smaller and smaller, and they torn more rapidly, but when you try to seize it the life is gone- and so, by popular definition, some would say that life was never there in the first place. The wheels and the cogs are the secret and we can make them better in time- machines that will run faster and more accurately than real mice to real cheese.

I have no doubt it can be done, though a mouse harvesting seeds on an autumn thistle is to me a fine sight and more complicated. I think, in his multiform activity, than a machine "mouse" running a maze. Also I like to think of the possible shape of the future brooding in mice, just as it brooded once in a rather ordinary mousy insectivore who became a man. It leaves a nice fine indeterminate sense of wonder that even an electronic brain hasn’t got, because you know perfectly well that if the electronic brain changes, it will be because of something man has done to it. But what man will do to himself he doesn’t really know. A certain scale of time and a ghostly intangible thing called change are ticking in him. Powers and potentialities like the oak in the seed, or a red and awful ruin. Either way, it's impressive; and the mouse has it, too. Or those birds, I’ll never forget those birds - yet before I measured their significance. I learned the lesson of time first of all. I was young then and left alone in a great desert – part of an expedition that had scattered its men over several hundred miles in order to carry on research more effectively. I learned there that time is a series of planes existing superficially in the same universe. The tempo is a human illusion, a subjective clock ticking in our own kind of protoplasm.

 

  1. The Bird and the Machine

  2. Man and Machine

  3. Man and Machine: A Functional Overview

  4. What Machine Can, Man Can't: And Vice Versa

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The title of the passage should be such that it covers the complete idea of the passage. The author has compared man & machine but has never conveyed that what machines can do, man can't. So, we can easily say that the passage gives a functional overview of man & machine. Hence, (3) is the correct option choice.

Multiple choice

We can surely conclude from the passage that the author

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

I suppose their little bones have years ago been lost among the stones and winds of those high glacial pastures. I suppose their leathers blew eventually into the piles of tumbleweed beneath the straggling cattle fences and rotted there in the mountain snows along with dead steers and all the other things that drift to an end in the corners of the wire. I do not quite know why I should be thinking of birds over the New York Times at breakfast, particularly the birds of my youth half a continent away. It is a funny thing what the brain will do with memories and how it will treasure them and finally bring them into odd juxtapositions with other things, as though it wanted to make a design, or get some meaning out of them, whether you want it or not, or even see it.

It used to seem marvelous to me, but I read now that there are machines that can do these things in a small way, machines that can crawl about like animals, and that it may not be long now until do more things - maybe even make themselves – I saw that piece in the Times just now. And then they will, maybe – well, who knows - but you read about it more and more with no one raising any protest, and already they can add better than we and reach up and hear things through the dark and finger the guns over the night sky.

This is the new world that I read about at breakfast. This is the world that confronts me in my biological books and journals, until there are times when I sit quietly in my chair and try to hear the little purr of the cogs in my head and the tubes flaring and dying as the messages go through them and the circuits snap shut or open. This is the great age, make no mistake about it: the robot has been born somewhat appropriately along with the atom bomb, and the brain they say now is just another type of more complicated feedback system. The engineers have its basic principles worked out; it's mechanical, you know; nothing to get superstitious about; and man can always improve on nature once he gets the idea. Well, he’s got it all right and that’s why, I guess, that I sit here in my chair, with the article crunched in my hand, remembering those two birds and that blue mountain sunlight. There is another magazine article on my desk that reads “Machines Are Getting Smarter Every Day.” I don’t deny it, but I’ll still stick with the birds. It’s life I believe in, not machines.

Maybe you don’t believe there is any difference. A skeleton is all joints and pulleys, I’ll admit. And when man was in his simpler stages of machine building in the eighteenth century, he quickly saw the resemblances. “What.” wrote Hobbes, “is the heart but a spring, and the nerves but so many strings, and the joints but so many wheels, giving motion to the whole body?” Tinkering about in their shops it was inevitable in the end that men would see the world as a huge machine “subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines.”

The idea took on with a vengeance. Little automatons toured the country - dolls controlled by clockwork. Clocks described as little worlds were taken on tours by their designers. They were made up of moving figures, shifting scenes and other remarkable devices. The life of the cell was unknown. Man, whether he was conceived as possessing a soul or not, moved and jerked about like these tiny tippets. A human being thought of himself in terms of his own tools and implements. He had been fashioned like the puppets he produced and was only a more clever model made by a greater designer.

Then in the nineteenth century, the cell was discovered, and the single machine in its turn was found to be the product of millions of infinitesimal machines - the cells. Now, finally, the cell itself dissolves away into an abstract chemical machine and that into some intangible, inexpressible flow of energy. The secret seems to lurk all about, the wheels get smaller and smaller, and they torn more rapidly, but when you try to seize it the life is gone- and so, by popular definition, some would say that life was never there in the first place. The wheels and the cogs are the secret and we can make them better in time- machines that will run faster and more accurately than real mice to real cheese.

I have no doubt it can be done, though a mouse harvesting seeds on an autumn thistle is to me a fine sight and more complicated. I think, in his multiform activity, than a machine "mouse" running a maze. Also I like to think of the possible shape of the future brooding in mice, just as it brooded once in a rather ordinary mousy insectivore who became a man. It leaves a nice fine indeterminate sense of wonder that even an electronic brain hasn’t got, because you know perfectly well that if the electronic brain changes, it will be because of something man has done to it. But what man will do to himself he doesn’t really know. A certain scale of time and a ghostly intangible thing called change are ticking in him. Powers and potentialities like the oak in the seed, or a red and awful ruin. Either way, it's impressive; and the mouse has it, too. Or those birds, I’ll never forget those birds - yet before I measured their significance. I learned the lesson of time first of all. I was young then and left alone in a great desert – part of an expedition that had scattered its men over several hundred miles in order to carry on research more effectively. I learned there that time is a series of planes existing superficially in the same universe. The tempo is a human illusion, a subjective clock ticking in our own kind of protoplasm.

 

  1. is disappointed with the kind and amount of progress made

  2. does not appreciate scientific advancement

  3. would love to remain superstitious about a few things

  4. none of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

'1' option can't be the answer as the author is not 'disappointed' with the kind of progress. May be the author has a different view about the kind of progress being made but this is nowhere mentioned as a disappointment. From the 3rd para, last line, the author says,''I don't deny it'' i.e. he agrees that machines are getting smarter everyday. So, option (2) can't be the answer. The author has not specifically mentioned that he would love to remain superstitious about a few things. So, (3) can't be the correct option. Hence, (4) is the correct option choice.

Multiple choice

The opening lines of the passage give an idea of

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

I suppose their little bones have years ago been lost among the stones and winds of those high glacial pastures. I suppose their leathers blew eventually into the piles of tumbleweed beneath the straggling cattle fences and rotted there in the mountain snows along with dead steers and all the other things that drift to an end in the corners of the wire. I do not quite know why I should be thinking of birds over the New York Times at breakfast, particularly the birds of my youth half a continent away. It is a funny thing what the brain will do with memories and how it will treasure them and finally bring them into odd juxtapositions with other things, as though it wanted to make a design, or get some meaning out of them, whether you want it or not, or even see it.

It used to seem marvelous to me, but I read now that there are machines that can do these things in a small way, machines that can crawl about like animals, and that it may not be long now until do more things - maybe even make themselves – I saw that piece in the Times just now. And then they will, maybe – well, who knows - but you read about it more and more with no one raising any protest, and already they can add better than we and reach up and hear things through the dark and finger the guns over the night sky.

This is the new world that I read about at breakfast. This is the world that confronts me in my biological books and journals, until there are times when I sit quietly in my chair and try to hear the little purr of the cogs in my head and the tubes flaring and dying as the messages go through them and the circuits snap shut or open. This is the great age, make no mistake about it: the robot has been born somewhat appropriately along with the atom bomb, and the brain they say now is just another type of more complicated feedback system. The engineers have its basic principles worked out; it's mechanical, you know; nothing to get superstitious about; and man can always improve on nature once he gets the idea. Well, he’s got it all right and that’s why, I guess, that I sit here in my chair, with the article crunched in my hand, remembering those two birds and that blue mountain sunlight. There is another magazine article on my desk that reads “Machines Are Getting Smarter Every Day.” I don’t deny it, but I’ll still stick with the birds. It’s life I believe in, not machines.

Maybe you don’t believe there is any difference. A skeleton is all joints and pulleys, I’ll admit. And when man was in his simpler stages of machine building in the eighteenth century, he quickly saw the resemblances. “What.” wrote Hobbes, “is the heart but a spring, and the nerves but so many strings, and the joints but so many wheels, giving motion to the whole body?” Tinkering about in their shops it was inevitable in the end that men would see the world as a huge machine “subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines.”

The idea took on with a vengeance. Little automatons toured the country - dolls controlled by clockwork. Clocks described as little worlds were taken on tours by their designers. They were made up of moving figures, shifting scenes and other remarkable devices. The life of the cell was unknown. Man, whether he was conceived as possessing a soul or not, moved and jerked about like these tiny tippets. A human being thought of himself in terms of his own tools and implements. He had been fashioned like the puppets he produced and was only a more clever model made by a greater designer.

Then in the nineteenth century, the cell was discovered, and the single machine in its turn was found to be the product of millions of infinitesimal machines - the cells. Now, finally, the cell itself dissolves away into an abstract chemical machine and that into some intangible, inexpressible flow of energy. The secret seems to lurk all about, the wheels get smaller and smaller, and they torn more rapidly, but when you try to seize it the life is gone- and so, by popular definition, some would say that life was never there in the first place. The wheels and the cogs are the secret and we can make them better in time- machines that will run faster and more accurately than real mice to real cheese.

I have no doubt it can be done, though a mouse harvesting seeds on an autumn thistle is to me a fine sight and more complicated. I think, in his multiform activity, than a machine "mouse" running a maze. Also I like to think of the possible shape of the future brooding in mice, just as it brooded once in a rather ordinary mousy insectivore who became a man. It leaves a nice fine indeterminate sense of wonder that even an electronic brain hasn’t got, because you know perfectly well that if the electronic brain changes, it will be because of something man has done to it. But what man will do to himself he doesn’t really know. A certain scale of time and a ghostly intangible thing called change are ticking in him. Powers and potentialities like the oak in the seed, or a red and awful ruin. Either way, it's impressive; and the mouse has it, too. Or those birds, I’ll never forget those birds - yet before I measured their significance. I learned the lesson of time first of all. I was young then and left alone in a great desert – part of an expedition that had scattered its men over several hundred miles in order to carry on research more effectively. I learned there that time is a series of planes existing superficially in the same universe. The tempo is a human illusion, a subjective clock ticking in our own kind of protoplasm.

 

  1. mockery of a well-built system

  2. an amazed concern about how much has changed

  3. inconsistencies in human behaviour from time to time

  4. careless cramming of a lot of objects, aimlessly huddled together

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The answer to this question can be inferred from opening lines of 1st para ''little bones have years age been last'', ''leathers blew ----- corners of wire''. By this, the author is indicating towards the drastic changes which have taken place with time. This clearly shows an amazed concern about the changes which have taken place. Hence, (2) is correct option choice.

Multiple choice

The first sentence of para 6 indicates that

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

I suppose their little bones have years ago been lost among the stones and winds of those high glacial pastures. I suppose their leathers blew eventually into the piles of tumbleweed beneath the straggling cattle fences and rotted there in the mountain snows along with dead steers and all the other things that drift to an end in the corners of the wire. I do not quite know why I should be thinking of birds over the New York Times at breakfast, particularly the birds of my youth half a continent away. It is a funny thing what the brain will do with memories and how it will treasure them and finally bring them into odd juxtapositions with other things, as though it wanted to make a design, or get some meaning out of them, whether you want it or not, or even see it.

It used to seem marvelous to me, but I read now that there are machines that can do these things in a small way, machines that can crawl about like animals, and that it may not be long now until do more things - maybe even make themselves – I saw that piece in the Times just now. And then they will, maybe – well, who knows - but you read about it more and more with no one raising any protest, and already they can add better than we and reach up and hear things through the dark and finger the guns over the night sky.

This is the new world that I read about at breakfast. This is the world that confronts me in my biological books and journals, until there are times when I sit quietly in my chair and try to hear the little purr of the cogs in my head and the tubes flaring and dying as the messages go through them and the circuits snap shut or open. This is the great age, make no mistake about it: the robot has been born somewhat appropriately along with the atom bomb, and the brain they say now is just another type of more complicated feedback system. The engineers have its basic principles worked out; it's mechanical, you know; nothing to get superstitious about; and man can always improve on nature once he gets the idea. Well, he’s got it all right and that’s why, I guess, that I sit here in my chair, with the article crunched in my hand, remembering those two birds and that blue mountain sunlight. There is another magazine article on my desk that reads “Machines Are Getting Smarter Every Day.” I don’t deny it, but I’ll still stick with the birds. It’s life I believe in, not machines.

Maybe you don’t believe there is any difference. A skeleton is all joints and pulleys, I’ll admit. And when man was in his simpler stages of machine building in the eighteenth century, he quickly saw the resemblances. “What.” wrote Hobbes, “is the heart but a spring, and the nerves but so many strings, and the joints but so many wheels, giving motion to the whole body?” Tinkering about in their shops it was inevitable in the end that men would see the world as a huge machine “subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines.”

The idea took on with a vengeance. Little automatons toured the country - dolls controlled by clockwork. Clocks described as little worlds were taken on tours by their designers. They were made up of moving figures, shifting scenes and other remarkable devices. The life of the cell was unknown. Man, whether he was conceived as possessing a soul or not, moved and jerked about like these tiny tippets. A human being thought of himself in terms of his own tools and implements. He had been fashioned like the puppets he produced and was only a more clever model made by a greater designer.

Then in the nineteenth century, the cell was discovered, and the single machine in its turn was found to be the product of millions of infinitesimal machines - the cells. Now, finally, the cell itself dissolves away into an abstract chemical machine and that into some intangible, inexpressible flow of energy. The secret seems to lurk all about, the wheels get smaller and smaller, and they torn more rapidly, but when you try to seize it the life is gone- and so, by popular definition, some would say that life was never there in the first place. The wheels and the cogs are the secret and we can make them better in time- machines that will run faster and more accurately than real mice to real cheese.

I have no doubt it can be done, though a mouse harvesting seeds on an autumn thistle is to me a fine sight and more complicated. I think, in his multiform activity, than a machine "mouse" running a maze. Also I like to think of the possible shape of the future brooding in mice, just as it brooded once in a rather ordinary mousy insectivore who became a man. It leaves a nice fine indeterminate sense of wonder that even an electronic brain hasn’t got, because you know perfectly well that if the electronic brain changes, it will be because of something man has done to it. But what man will do to himself he doesn’t really know. A certain scale of time and a ghostly intangible thing called change are ticking in him. Powers and potentialities like the oak in the seed, or a red and awful ruin. Either way, it's impressive; and the mouse has it, too. Or those birds, I’ll never forget those birds - yet before I measured their significance. I learned the lesson of time first of all. I was young then and left alone in a great desert – part of an expedition that had scattered its men over several hundred miles in order to carry on research more effectively. I learned there that time is a series of planes existing superficially in the same universe. The tempo is a human illusion, a subjective clock ticking in our own kind of protoplasm.

 

  1. the author has a bias towards inanimate objects

  2. the sight of a real mouse is more pleasing than the sight of a machine mouse

  3. inanimate objects can never completely oust and supplant animate ones

  4. none of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

By the first sentence of para 6th, 'Then in the nineteenth ---- the calls', the author is simply telling that earlier organs were considered to be a single smallest entity but now smaller entities i.e. cells are discovered. The gist of the sentence is that we can make things better with time. This idea is not given in any of the choices. Hence, (4) is the correct option choice.

Multiple choice

The author gives the example of dolls and puppets to

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

I suppose their little bones have years ago been lost among the stones and winds of those high glacial pastures. I suppose their leathers blew eventually into the piles of tumbleweed beneath the straggling cattle fences and rotted there in the mountain snows along with dead steers and all the other things that drift to an end in the corners of the wire. I do not quite know why I should be thinking of birds over the New York Times at breakfast, particularly the birds of my youth half a continent away. It is a funny thing what the brain will do with memories and how it will treasure them and finally bring them into odd juxtapositions with other things, as though it wanted to make a design, or get some meaning out of them, whether you want it or not, or even see it.

It used to seem marvelous to me, but I read now that there are machines that can do these things in a small way, machines that can crawl about like animals, and that it may not be long now until do more things - maybe even make themselves – I saw that piece in the Times just now. And then they will, maybe – well, who knows - but you read about it more and more with no one raising any protest, and already they can add better than we and reach up and hear things through the dark and finger the guns over the night sky.

This is the new world that I read about at breakfast. This is the world that confronts me in my biological books and journals, until there are times when I sit quietly in my chair and try to hear the little purr of the cogs in my head and the tubes flaring and dying as the messages go through them and the circuits snap shut or open. This is the great age, make no mistake about it: the robot has been born somewhat appropriately along with the atom bomb, and the brain they say now is just another type of more complicated feedback system. The engineers have its basic principles worked out; it's mechanical, you know; nothing to get superstitious about; and man can always improve on nature once he gets the idea. Well, he’s got it all right and that’s why, I guess, that I sit here in my chair, with the article crunched in my hand, remembering those two birds and that blue mountain sunlight. There is another magazine article on my desk that reads “Machines Are Getting Smarter Every Day.” I don’t deny it, but I’ll still stick with the birds. It’s life I believe in, not machines.

Maybe you don’t believe there is any difference. A skeleton is all joints and pulleys, I’ll admit. And when man was in his simpler stages of machine building in the eighteenth century, he quickly saw the resemblances. “What.” wrote Hobbes, “is the heart but a spring, and the nerves but so many strings, and the joints but so many wheels, giving motion to the whole body?” Tinkering about in their shops it was inevitable in the end that men would see the world as a huge machine “subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines.”

The idea took on with a vengeance. Little automatons toured the country - dolls controlled by clockwork. Clocks described as little worlds were taken on tours by their designers. They were made up of moving figures, shifting scenes and other remarkable devices. The life of the cell was unknown. Man, whether he was conceived as possessing a soul or not, moved and jerked about like these tiny tippets. A human being thought of himself in terms of his own tools and implements. He had been fashioned like the puppets he produced and was only a more clever model made by a greater designer.

Then in the nineteenth century, the cell was discovered, and the single machine in its turn was found to be the product of millions of infinitesimal machines - the cells. Now, finally, the cell itself dissolves away into an abstract chemical machine and that into some intangible, inexpressible flow of energy. The secret seems to lurk all about, the wheels get smaller and smaller, and they torn more rapidly, but when you try to seize it the life is gone- and so, by popular definition, some would say that life was never there in the first place. The wheels and the cogs are the secret and we can make them better in time- machines that will run faster and more accurately than real mice to real cheese.

I have no doubt it can be done, though a mouse harvesting seeds on an autumn thistle is to me a fine sight and more complicated. I think, in his multiform activity, than a machine "mouse" running a maze. Also I like to think of the possible shape of the future brooding in mice, just as it brooded once in a rather ordinary mousy insectivore who became a man. It leaves a nice fine indeterminate sense of wonder that even an electronic brain hasn’t got, because you know perfectly well that if the electronic brain changes, it will be because of something man has done to it. But what man will do to himself he doesn’t really know. A certain scale of time and a ghostly intangible thing called change are ticking in him. Powers and potentialities like the oak in the seed, or a red and awful ruin. Either way, it's impressive; and the mouse has it, too. Or those birds, I’ll never forget those birds - yet before I measured their significance. I learned the lesson of time first of all. I was young then and left alone in a great desert – part of an expedition that had scattered its men over several hundred miles in order to carry on research more effectively. I learned there that time is a series of planes existing superficially in the same universe. The tempo is a human illusion, a subjective clock ticking in our own kind of protoplasm.

 

  1. substantiate that mechanical devices and man have nothing in common.

  2. invalidate the proposition that man and machine are identical in all respects.

  3. to be convinced about the analogies people draw to correlate man and machine.

  4. thank the designer that produced the puppets.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The author has discussed the example of dolls and puppets in 5th para. (2) can't be the correct option because of “identical in all respects” which is too extreme to be justified. The author is against the idea in option (1). (4) choice does not contain the gist of the example. We can say that it is about analogies which people draw to correlate man and machine. Hence, (3) is correct option choice.

Multiple choice

We can surely say that the author doesn't deny the fact that the whole human body is a complicated machine.

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

I suppose their little bones have years ago been lost among the stones and winds of those high glacial pastures. I suppose their leathers blew eventually into the piles of tumbleweed beneath the straggling cattle fences and rotted there in the mountain snows along with dead steers and all the other things that drift to an end in the corners of the wire. I do not quite know why I should be thinking of birds over the New York Times at breakfast, particularly the birds of my youth half a continent away. It is a funny thing what the brain will do with memories and how it will treasure them and finally bring them into odd juxtapositions with other things, as though it wanted to make a design, or get some meaning out of them, whether you want it or not, or even see it.

It used to seem marvelous to me, but I read now that there are machines that can do these things in a small way, machines that can crawl about like animals, and that it may not be long now until do more things - maybe even make themselves – I saw that piece in the Times just now. And then they will, maybe – well, who knows - but you read about it more and more with no one raising any protest, and already they can add better than we and reach up and hear things through the dark and finger the guns over the night sky.

This is the new world that I read about at breakfast. This is the world that confronts me in my biological books and journals, until there are times when I sit quietly in my chair and try to hear the little purr of the cogs in my head and the tubes flaring and dying as the messages go through them and the circuits snap shut or open. This is the great age, make no mistake about it: the robot has been born somewhat appropriately along with the atom bomb, and the brain they say now is just another type of more complicated feedback system. The engineers have its basic principles worked out; it's mechanical, you know; nothing to get superstitious about; and man can always improve on nature once he gets the idea. Well, he’s got it all right and that’s why, I guess, that I sit here in my chair, with the article crunched in my hand, remembering those two birds and that blue mountain sunlight. There is another magazine article on my desk that reads “Machines Are Getting Smarter Every Day.” I don’t deny it, but I’ll still stick with the birds. It’s life I believe in, not machines.

Maybe you don’t believe there is any difference. A skeleton is all joints and pulleys, I’ll admit. And when man was in his simpler stages of machine building in the eighteenth century, he quickly saw the resemblances. “What.” wrote Hobbes, “is the heart but a spring, and the nerves but so many strings, and the joints but so many wheels, giving motion to the whole body?” Tinkering about in their shops it was inevitable in the end that men would see the world as a huge machine “subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines.”

The idea took on with a vengeance. Little automatons toured the country - dolls controlled by clockwork. Clocks described as little worlds were taken on tours by their designers. They were made up of moving figures, shifting scenes and other remarkable devices. The life of the cell was unknown. Man, whether he was conceived as possessing a soul or not, moved and jerked about like these tiny tippets. A human being thought of himself in terms of his own tools and implements. He had been fashioned like the puppets he produced and was only a more clever model made by a greater designer.

Then in the nineteenth century, the cell was discovered, and the single machine in its turn was found to be the product of millions of infinitesimal machines - the cells. Now, finally, the cell itself dissolves away into an abstract chemical machine and that into some intangible, inexpressible flow of energy. The secret seems to lurk all about, the wheels get smaller and smaller, and they torn more rapidly, but when you try to seize it the life is gone- and so, by popular definition, some would say that life was never there in the first place. The wheels and the cogs are the secret and we can make them better in time- machines that will run faster and more accurately than real mice to real cheese.

I have no doubt it can be done, though a mouse harvesting seeds on an autumn thistle is to me a fine sight and more complicated. I think, in his multiform activity, than a machine "mouse" running a maze. Also I like to think of the possible shape of the future brooding in mice, just as it brooded once in a rather ordinary mousy insectivore who became a man. It leaves a nice fine indeterminate sense of wonder that even an electronic brain hasn’t got, because you know perfectly well that if the electronic brain changes, it will be because of something man has done to it. But what man will do to himself he doesn’t really know. A certain scale of time and a ghostly intangible thing called change are ticking in him. Powers and potentialities like the oak in the seed, or a red and awful ruin. Either way, it's impressive; and the mouse has it, too. Or those birds, I’ll never forget those birds - yet before I measured their significance. I learned the lesson of time first of all. I was young then and left alone in a great desert – part of an expedition that had scattered its men over several hundred miles in order to carry on research more effectively. I learned there that time is a series of planes existing superficially in the same universe. The tempo is a human illusion, a subjective clock ticking in our own kind of protoplasm.

 

  1. True

  2. False

  3. Can't say

  4. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

3rd line of 4th para ''is the heart --------- lesser machines'' clearly indicates that the author considers human body to be a machine. Hence, '1' is the correct option choice.

Multiple choice

The lines in the third para, ''This is the world ..... the circuits snap shut or open'' indicate that

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

I suppose their little bones have years ago been lost among the stones and winds of those high glacial pastures. I suppose their leathers blew eventually into the piles of tumbleweed beneath the straggling cattle fences and rotted there in the mountain snows along with dead steers and all the other things that drift to an end in the corners of the wire. I do not quite know why I should be thinking of birds over the New York Times at breakfast, particularly the birds of my youth half a continent away. It is a funny thing what the brain will do with memories and how it will treasure them and finally bring them into odd juxtapositions with other things, as though it wanted to make a design, or get some meaning out of them, whether you want it or not, or even see it.

It used to seem marvelous to me, but I read now that there are machines that can do these things in a small way, machines that can crawl about like animals, and that it may not be long now until do more things - maybe even make themselves – I saw that piece in the Times just now. And then they will, maybe – well, who knows - but you read about it more and more with no one raising any protest, and already they can add better than we and reach up and hear things through the dark and finger the guns over the night sky.

This is the new world that I read about at breakfast. This is the world that confronts me in my biological books and journals, until there are times when I sit quietly in my chair and try to hear the little purr of the cogs in my head and the tubes flaring and dying as the messages go through them and the circuits snap shut or open. This is the great age, make no mistake about it: the robot has been born somewhat appropriately along with the atom bomb, and the brain they say now is just another type of more complicated feedback system. The engineers have its basic principles worked out; it's mechanical, you know; nothing to get superstitious about; and man can always improve on nature once he gets the idea. Well, he’s got it all right and that’s why, I guess, that I sit here in my chair, with the article crunched in my hand, remembering those two birds and that blue mountain sunlight. There is another magazine article on my desk that reads “Machines Are Getting Smarter Every Day.” I don’t deny it, but I’ll still stick with the birds. It’s life I believe in, not machines.

Maybe you don’t believe there is any difference. A skeleton is all joints and pulleys, I’ll admit. And when man was in his simpler stages of machine building in the eighteenth century, he quickly saw the resemblances. “What.” wrote Hobbes, “is the heart but a spring, and the nerves but so many strings, and the joints but so many wheels, giving motion to the whole body?” Tinkering about in their shops it was inevitable in the end that men would see the world as a huge machine “subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines.”

The idea took on with a vengeance. Little automatons toured the country - dolls controlled by clockwork. Clocks described as little worlds were taken on tours by their designers. They were made up of moving figures, shifting scenes and other remarkable devices. The life of the cell was unknown. Man, whether he was conceived as possessing a soul or not, moved and jerked about like these tiny tippets. A human being thought of himself in terms of his own tools and implements. He had been fashioned like the puppets he produced and was only a more clever model made by a greater designer.

Then in the nineteenth century, the cell was discovered, and the single machine in its turn was found to be the product of millions of infinitesimal machines - the cells. Now, finally, the cell itself dissolves away into an abstract chemical machine and that into some intangible, inexpressible flow of energy. The secret seems to lurk all about, the wheels get smaller and smaller, and they torn more rapidly, but when you try to seize it the life is gone- and so, by popular definition, some would say that life was never there in the first place. The wheels and the cogs are the secret and we can make them better in time- machines that will run faster and more accurately than real mice to real cheese.

I have no doubt it can be done, though a mouse harvesting seeds on an autumn thistle is to me a fine sight and more complicated. I think, in his multiform activity, than a machine "mouse" running a maze. Also I like to think of the possible shape of the future brooding in mice, just as it brooded once in a rather ordinary mousy insectivore who became a man. It leaves a nice fine indeterminate sense of wonder that even an electronic brain hasn’t got, because you know perfectly well that if the electronic brain changes, it will be because of something man has done to it. But what man will do to himself he doesn’t really know. A certain scale of time and a ghostly intangible thing called change are ticking in him. Powers and potentialities like the oak in the seed, or a red and awful ruin. Either way, it's impressive; and the mouse has it, too. Or those birds, I’ll never forget those birds - yet before I measured their significance. I learned the lesson of time first of all. I was young then and left alone in a great desert – part of an expedition that had scattered its men over several hundred miles in order to carry on research more effectively. I learned there that time is a series of planes existing superficially in the same universe. The tempo is a human illusion, a subjective clock ticking in our own kind of protoplasm.

 

  1. the author has a free flow of ideas going into his brain.

  2. the author is not able to make out anything.

  3. there is some sudden enlightenment dawning on the author, making him disbelieve everything.

  4. the author is understanding things in jerks and pauses.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

In these lines, the author says, ''try to hear the little purr of cogs in my head''. By this, the author tries to say that he has difficulty in understanding i.e., the author is understanding things in jerks and pauses. Hence, (4) is the correct option choice.

Multiple choice

The tone of the passage is

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

I suppose their little bones have years ago been lost among the stones and winds of those high glacial pastures. I suppose their leathers blew eventually into the piles of tumbleweed beneath the straggling cattle fences and rotted there in the mountain snows along with dead steers and all the other things that drift to an end in the corners of the wire. I do not quite know why I should be thinking of birds over the New York Times at breakfast, particularly the birds of my youth half a continent away. It is a funny thing what the brain will do with memories and how it will treasure them and finally bring them into odd juxtapositions with other things, as though it wanted to make a design, or get some meaning out of them, whether you want it or not, or even see it.

It used to seem marvelous to me, but I read now that there are machines that can do these things in a small way, machines that can crawl about like animals, and that it may not be long now until do more things - maybe even make themselves – I saw that piece in the Times just now. And then they will, maybe – well, who knows - but you read about it more and more with no one raising any protest, and already they can add better than we and reach up and hear things through the dark and finger the guns over the night sky.

This is the new world that I read about at breakfast. This is the world that confronts me in my biological books and journals, until there are times when I sit quietly in my chair and try to hear the little purr of the cogs in my head and the tubes flaring and dying as the messages go through them and the circuits snap shut or open. This is the great age, make no mistake about it: the robot has been born somewhat appropriately along with the atom bomb, and the brain they say now is just another type of more complicated feedback system. The engineers have its basic principles worked out; it's mechanical, you know; nothing to get superstitious about; and man can always improve on nature once he gets the idea. Well, he’s got it all right and that’s why, I guess, that I sit here in my chair, with the article crunched in my hand, remembering those two birds and that blue mountain sunlight. There is another magazine article on my desk that reads “Machines Are Getting Smarter Every Day.” I don’t deny it, but I’ll still stick with the birds. It’s life I believe in, not machines.

Maybe you don’t believe there is any difference. A skeleton is all joints and pulleys, I’ll admit. And when man was in his simpler stages of machine building in the eighteenth century, he quickly saw the resemblances. “What.” wrote Hobbes, “is the heart but a spring, and the nerves but so many strings, and the joints but so many wheels, giving motion to the whole body?” Tinkering about in their shops it was inevitable in the end that men would see the world as a huge machine “subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines.”

The idea took on with a vengeance. Little automatons toured the country - dolls controlled by clockwork. Clocks described as little worlds were taken on tours by their designers. They were made up of moving figures, shifting scenes and other remarkable devices. The life of the cell was unknown. Man, whether he was conceived as possessing a soul or not, moved and jerked about like these tiny tippets. A human being thought of himself in terms of his own tools and implements. He had been fashioned like the puppets he produced and was only a more clever model made by a greater designer.

Then in the nineteenth century, the cell was discovered, and the single machine in its turn was found to be the product of millions of infinitesimal machines - the cells. Now, finally, the cell itself dissolves away into an abstract chemical machine and that into some intangible, inexpressible flow of energy. The secret seems to lurk all about, the wheels get smaller and smaller, and they torn more rapidly, but when you try to seize it the life is gone- and so, by popular definition, some would say that life was never there in the first place. The wheels and the cogs are the secret and we can make them better in time- machines that will run faster and more accurately than real mice to real cheese.

I have no doubt it can be done, though a mouse harvesting seeds on an autumn thistle is to me a fine sight and more complicated. I think, in his multiform activity, than a machine "mouse" running a maze. Also I like to think of the possible shape of the future brooding in mice, just as it brooded once in a rather ordinary mousy insectivore who became a man. It leaves a nice fine indeterminate sense of wonder that even an electronic brain hasn’t got, because you know perfectly well that if the electronic brain changes, it will be because of something man has done to it. But what man will do to himself he doesn’t really know. A certain scale of time and a ghostly intangible thing called change are ticking in him. Powers and potentialities like the oak in the seed, or a red and awful ruin. Either way, it's impressive; and the mouse has it, too. Or those birds, I’ll never forget those birds - yet before I measured their significance. I learned the lesson of time first of all. I was young then and left alone in a great desert – part of an expedition that had scattered its men over several hundred miles in order to carry on research more effectively. I learned there that time is a series of planes existing superficially in the same universe. The tempo is a human illusion, a subjective clock ticking in our own kind of protoplasm.

 

  1. narrative

  2. that of unreserved criticism of machines

  3. suggestive of an alarming apprehension

  4. sceptical

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

1&3 options are eliminated as the tone of passage can't be termed as 'narrative' or suggestive of any 'alarming apprehension'. (2) can't be the answer as the tone can be better termed as 'sceptical' rather than 'criticism of machines. We can easily infer from the passage that the author is skeptical about machines and their capabilities when compared with man. Hence (4) is the correct option choice.