Commerce Accountancy · Law Legal Studies

Business Organizations and Corporate Governance

1,376 Questions

Business organizations and corporate governance explore company structures, stakeholder responsibilities, and regulatory frameworks under the Companies Act. These commerce topics are essential for Chartered Accountancy, company secretary exams, and banking probationary officer assessments. Practice these questions to master corporate formation, director roles, and business ownership types.

Companies Act 2013 provisionsCorporate stakeholder rolesPrivate limited company rulesDebenture holder rightsCompany incorporation rulesState-owned enterprises

Business Organizations and Corporate Governance Questions

Multiple choice
  1. can

  2. shall

  3. might

  4. may

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Here, shall is the correct option, as it is used to express obligation even with third-person or second-person constructions. Can is used as a simple present participle, might is used to indicate the possibility that something is true or will happen in the future and may is used to indicate that something could be true or could have happened or will possibly happen.

Multiple choice

Which of the following statements would the author be most likely to disagree with?

  1. The overall mood of the large Indian family businesses can be summed up in one word - insecure.
  2. It is safe to say that nine out of ten Indian companies indulge in corrupt practices.
  3. Given the poor management practices of Indian companies, foreign companies have nothing to gain from collaboration.

Directions: Read the following passages and answer the question that follows:

PASSAGE – II

The new takeover code, looks at first glance like a typically complicated bit of Indian rulemaking. But two incendiary charges are buried within its many pages. First, SEBI wants to make takeovers, including hostile bids, much easier. Second, it wants to protect the rights of minority shareholders. For instance, any investor who takes a stake of 10% in a company must then make an offer for a further 20%, after that, any substantial increase has to be by an open offer to all the shareholders.

Just possibly, the new takeover code may cause the very large house of cards that is corporate India to collapse. It provides a way for the families that control Indian businesses to be replaced by more widely held companies or even by corporate raiders. Their immediate problem is cash. With profits harder to make, credit hard to come by, and a relatively small equity market, many family firms are being forced to weed their portfolios, retiring from investments they rushed into, in easier times.

If the government relaxes rules requiring an Indian majority holding in any company holding a telecoms licence, the foreigners may use these loans as a springboard for a full takeover. Many foreign companies now favour full control, seeing it as a chance to impose their own standards. In the early stages, a foreign firm needs a local partner’s government contacts and distribution; but once established, foreign firms complain that local partners contribute little in the way of technology or capital. One of the advisors, McKinsey & Co., a management consultancy, points out in a forthcoming report that the government now allows foreign firms to set up wholly owned investment companies that can subsequently buy Indian firms.

In the past, the big families could count on the support of India's financial institutions, which own around 40% of most big companies. However, institutions such as the Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India are now trying hard to prune non-performing assets. They have told families such as the Modis that they must sort out their run-down businesses or close them (which is difficult under India's restrictive labour laws) or sell. Before, we used to be benign investors. Now families will increasingly be asked to go when they don't perform, says one senior manager. Still, no family has yet been thrown to the wolves.

 

 

  1. 1 only

  2. 1 and 3 only

  3. 1 and 2 only.

  4. 2 and 3 only

  5. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The second para provides a clue to the purpose of the passage. Words like warning, collapse, etc. and the last para suggest insecurity, which makes option (2) the only option the author would agree with.

Multiple choice
  1. managers

  2. promoters

  3. directors

  4. shareholders

  5. outsiders

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

Pocket payment (or out-of-pocket cost) refers to costs that require immediate cash payment to external parties, such as suppliers or service providers.

Multiple choice
  1. I only

  2. I and II only

  3. III only

  4. I and III only

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Noted Chartered Accountant Y. H. Malegam was Chairman of SEBI Committee on Disclosures and Accounting Standard. SCODA has recommended mandatory rotation � every five years � of the partners of the audit firms signing the accounts of a listed company.

Multiple choice
  1. Communities law board

  2. Company law board

  3. Constitutional law board

  4. Committee law board

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Company law board

Multiple choice
  1. limited liability

  2. perpetual succession

  3. transferability of shares

  4. all of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The firm does not enjoy perpetual succession. The joint stock company enjoys all these features.

Multiple choice
  1. a shareholder

  2. an agent

  3. a principal

  4. both (1) and (3)

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

A minor can neither become a shareholder nor a principal However, he can be an agent.