Multiple choice

Statement (A): ‘A’ is accused of abetment to commit theft and 'B' has not committed any offence. Reason (R): Abettor’s liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.

  1. Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).

  2. Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).

  3. (A) is true, but (R) is false.

  4. (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Abettor's liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender. He/she has encouraged or aided in the commitment of a crime. Thus, the abettor will be liable for his part in the crime.

Keep practicing — related questions