Multiple choice

Which of the following statements is true in relation to abetment of an offence?

  1. It is not necessary that the offence abetted has been committed

  2. There is no question of abetment unless the, offence abetted has been committed

  3. That to prove offence of abetment it is necessary to prove that the abettor has extended helping hand in the commission of the offence

  4. None of these
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Option A is correct. Under Section 107 IPC, abetment is complete when the act is abetted - it's not necessary that the offence abetted has actually been committed. Abetment is a distinct offence that can exist independently of the commission of the principal offence. Option B is wrong because abetment doesn't require completion. Option C incorrectly suggests a 'helping hand' must be proven, which isn't required under law.

Keep practicing — related questions