Consider the following statements: (i) Joinder is an ingredient of conspiracy and unlawfulness is implied in it for causing injury, Joinder is a cause of action (ii) Where the fact of joinder is absent the cause of action becomes irrelevant (iii) For serving his own legal interest Joinder will not create a cause of action Which of the statement is true in the above statements?

Statement (ii) is correct because without joinder (conspiracy), there can be no cause of action for conspiracy - the essence of conspiracy is the unlawful agreement. Statement (iii) is correct because conspiracy requires an unlawful purpose - pursuing one's own lawful legal interest cannot constitute conspiracy, regardless of joinder. Statement (i) is incorrect because joinder alone doesn't create conspiracy without an unlawful element.