Multiple choice

The author while talking about barter system in India refers to jajmani system. Besides highlighting the barter system prevalent in India, what else does this system convey?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

 

The history of money and coins takes us back to when man first felt the need to exchange goods and services. Early palaeolithic man lived by hunting and fishing, sharing the flesh or fish obtained by the members of a group, each a self-sufficient unit in clash or conflict with neighbouring groups, from whom things of value could be had only through robbery or violence. With more peaceful forms of contact, trade began as simple barter of commodities; and gradually, instead of jealously guarding their resources, men began to go in search of products of other tribes and regions.


In India a form of barter of goods and services survived till recently in its jajmani system, where services rendered by members of hereditary castes of potters, carpenters, masons, weavers of goods, barbers, washer men, weavers, cooks, pundits and astrologers were traditionally paid for in kind—gram, oil, raw sugar, dairy products etc.But barter had its limitations: there had to be a simultaneous need to buy and sell and there had to be some standards of value. It therefore gave way, as the market place developed and widened choices, to a more precise way of using some durable products of intrinsic value. A seller could accept in exchange a product, which although he did not need to buy then, or not at all, could be used as a store of value and medium of exchange in the future.

Limestone money was in use in the Yap Islands till after the Second World War. Not cheap by current standards, a stone ‘a foot in diameter cost about seventy-five US dollars. A stone man-high was worth many villages and plantations, and a stone two-men high was beyond price’, according to William Price. He adds, ‘our experience in trying to make United States dollars legal tender on Yap is somewhat humbling. Yesterday it was the Japanese; today it is the Americans; tomorrow it could be somebody else.

Shells, particularly cowries, remained in universal use in Asia, China, Africa and Europe till not so long ago. In the Punjab, till the late 1920s, cowries valued at much less than a pice (sixty-four to a rupee) were sold by old women in markets from heaps piled in front of them as a subsidiary currency for marginal adjustment of prices. The cowry shell had a special value for rituals and ceremonies, for warding off the evil eye because of its resemblance to an eye, and a as a symbol of fertility and reproduction for its shape.

 

 

  1. It conveys that the jajmani system was rooted in the caste system of India.

  2. It conveys that the caste system was a pillar of strength to Indian society.

  3. It conveys that the hereditary caste system was the pivot of Indian economic activities.

  4. It conveys that Indian society was very well served by this caste system.

  5. If it were not for the modern monetary system, India would have much preferred the jajmani system.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

(1) It is clear from the reading of the passage that the very basis of the jajmani system was caste based vocations of people. It is true that this system was rooted in the caste system of India. (2) It merely conveys that the caste system was strongly embedded in India. There is nothing in the passage to suggest that it was a pillar of strength to the society. (3) Even as the members of hereditary caste rendered caste related services for which they were paid in kind, it cannot be inferred that this was the pivot of their economic activities. (4) The author has not gone into the gamut of this question of whether the caste system served the society well. (5) This is too presumptuous to be true. Present monetary system is an improvement over the old barter system, and there is no reason to believe India would have remained rooted in its past when the whole world progressed.