To determine the main point the author is trying to make, let's analyze the paragraph. The author states that the criminal justice system needs to change and suggests two ways to make it more just: allowing victims the opportunity to confront the person who has harmed them and facilitating mediation between victims and their offenders.
From this information, we can conclude that the author believes victims of a crime should have the right to confront their offenders. This best supports statement B: "Victims of a crime should have the right to confront their offenders."
Option A) Learn to forgive their offenders - This option is not supported by the paragraph. While the paragraph suggests that offenders should have a chance to apologize, it does not mention forgiveness.
Option B) Have the right to confront their offenders - This option is supported by the paragraph. The author specifically mentions that victims should have the opportunity to confront the person who has harmed them.
Option C) Learn the art of mediation - This option is not explicitly mentioned in the paragraph. Although mediation is suggested as a way to facilitate communication between victims and offenders, it is not stated that victims need to learn this art.
Option D) Insist that their offenders be punished - This option is not mentioned in the paragraph. Punishment is not discussed as a solution to making the criminal justice system more just.
Option E) Have the right to impose a sentence on their offenders - This option is not supported by the paragraph. While the paragraph mentions mediation, it does not suggest that victims should have the right to impose a sentence on their offenders.
Therefore, the correct answer is B) Have the right to confront their offenders. This option is supported by the paragraph as it aligns with the author's suggestion of allowing victims the opportunity to confront the person who has harmed them.