Tag: communication

Questions Related to communication

Multiple choice softskills communication
  1. Refute....Advocate

  2. Rebut....Impugn

  3. Withhold....Traduce

  4. Challenge....Champion

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The sentence structure requires contrasting actions. Professors use arguments to 'refute' (argue against) the proposals of those who 'advocate' (support) legalization. This creates logical opposition. Option D 'Challenge...Champion' also works conceptually but A is the stronger collocation pair.

Multiple choice softskills communication
  1. hazardous....growth

  2. reckless....development

  3. desperate....vitality

  4. capricious....exuberance

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The sentence suggests scholars' uncritical acceptance of western thought has harmed religion. 'Desperate embracing' conveys urgency without positive alternatives. 'Vitality' as what was robbed makes sense - religion lost its life force. Options A and B suggest 'growth' and 'development' were robbed, which is illogical.

Multiple choice softskills communication
  1. provoked...prohibit

  2. prompted...ban

  3. inspired...sustain

  4. stimulated...forbid

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The report 'prompted' (caused) governments to 'ban' (prohibit) sales. 'Prompted...ban' is the strongest collocation. Option A 'provoked...prohibit' is grammatically incorrect (prohibit takes an object, not 'to prohibit'). Option D's 'forbid' also has similar grammatical issues.

Multiple choice softskills communication
  1. external...outlets

  2. superficial...boundaries

  3. supercilious....peripheries

  4. ostensible...outlines

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Literary criticism can adopt a 'superficial' (surface-level) scientific appearance 'within certain boundaries' (limits/constraints) and still remain useful criticism. This acknowledges that while criticism can never truly be scientific, it can appear so within defined contexts. Other options don't capture this nuanced relationship.