Tag: proofs in mathematics

Questions Related to proofs in mathematics

Multiple choice business maths proofs in mathematics implications principle of mathematical induction different forms of theoretical statements

Consider the following statements 
$p$:you want to success
$q$:you will find way,
then the negation of $\sim (p\vee q)$ is

  1. you want of success and you find a way

  2. you want of success and you do not find a way

  3. if you do not want to succeed then you will find a way

  4. if you want of success then you cannot find a way

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Multiple choice business maths proofs in mathematics implications principle of mathematical induction different forms of theoretical statements

Which of the following statements is a tautology

  1. $\left( { \sim p \vee q} \right) - \left( {p \vee \sim q} \right)$
  2. $\left( { \sim p \vee \sim q} \right) \to p \vee q$
  3. $\left( {p \vee \sim q} \right) \wedge \left( {p \vee q} \right)$
  4. $\left( { \sim p \vee \sim q} \right) \vee \left( {p \vee q} \right)$
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Multiple choice business maths proofs in mathematics implications principle of mathematical induction different forms of theoretical statements

The statement $p \to (q \to p)$ is equivalent to 

  1. $p \to q$
  2. $p \to (q \vee p)$
  3. $p \to (q \to p)$
  4. $p \to (q \wedge p)$
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The statement p -> (q -> p) is equivalent to p -> (~q OR p), which is ~p OR (~q OR p). This simplifies to (~p OR p) OR ~q, which is True OR ~q = True. Option B is also a tautology, but the equivalence is not standard.

Multiple choice business maths proofs in mathematics implications principle of mathematical induction different forms of theoretical statements

Which of the following is correct?

  1. $(~p \vee ~q) \equiv (p \wedge q)$
  2. $(p \rightarrow q) \equiv (~q \rightarrow ~p)$
  3. $~(p \rightarrow ~q) \equiv (p \wedge ~q)$
  4. $~(p \leftrightarrow q) \equiv (p \rightarrow q) \wedge (q \rightarrow p)$
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation


$~(p \leftrightarrow q) \equiv (p \rightarrow q) \wedge (q \rightarrow p)$ is true, we show it by truth table using boolean expression.

1.$p\rightarrow q$=min(1,1+q-p)
2.$p\wedge q$=min(p,q)
3.$p\leftrightarrow q$=1-|p-q|

Now we draw or make truth table using these operations
L.H.S  

 p  q $p\leftrightarrow q$ 
 1


R.H.S 

p $p\rightarrow q$  $q\rightarrow p$   $(p \rightarrow q) \wedge (q \rightarrow p)$
1  1  1  1
1  0

L.H.S =R.H.S

$~(p \leftrightarrow q) \equiv (p \rightarrow q) \wedge (q \rightarrow p)$

Multiple choice business maths proofs in mathematics implications principle of mathematical induction different forms of theoretical statements

$(p \wedge q) \vee  \sim p$ is equivalent to 

  1. $\sim p \wedge q$
  2. $\sim p \vee q$
  3. $p \wedge q$
  4. $p \vee q$
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

By distributive law, (p and q) or not p is equivalent to (p or not p) and (q or not p). Since (p or not p) is a tautology (True), the expression simplifies to (q or not p), which is not p or q.

Multiple choice business maths proofs in mathematics implications principle of mathematical induction different forms of theoretical statements

$\sim (p \wedge q)\Rightarrow (\sim p)\vee (\sim p \vee q)$ is equal to

  1. $\sim p \vee q$
  2. $\sim p \wedge q$
  3. $p\vee \sim q$
  4. $p\wedge \sim q$
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The expression ~(p AND q) -> (~p OR (~p OR q)) simplifies to ~(p AND q) -> (~p OR q). This is (~p OR ~q) -> (~p OR q). This is equivalent to (~(~p OR ~q) OR (~p OR q)) = (p AND q) OR (~p OR q). This simplifies to (~p OR q).

Multiple choice business maths proofs in mathematics implications principle of mathematical induction different forms of theoretical statements

The equivalent of $(p \rightarrow \sim p) \vee (\sim p \rightarrow p)$ is 

  1. $p \vee \sim p$
  2. $T \rightarrow F$
  3. $T \leftrightarrow F$
  4. $p \wedge \sim p$
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The expression (p -> ~p) is equivalent to ~p, and (~p -> p) is equivalent to p. Therefore, the disjunction (~p) v p is a tautology, which is equivalent to p v ~p.