Civics Polity ยท History

US Law and Government

1,893 Questions

This hub provides targeted practice on the American legal system, landmark Supreme Court cases, and federal legislation. It covers constitutional rights, public policies, and historical legal precedents shaping the nation. Answer these questions to build expertise in civics and political science.

Landmark Supreme Court casesFederal laws and actsConstitutional rightsPublic policy

US Law and Government Questions

Multiple choice

In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court strike down a state law that required women to obtain their husband's consent before obtaining an abortion?

  1. Planned Parenthood v. Casey

  2. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt

  3. Gonzales v. Carhart

  4. Stenberg v. Carhart
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Planned Parenthood v. Casey that states cannot require women to obtain their husband's consent before obtaining an abortion.

Multiple choice

Which case in 1992 affirmed the right to privacy and upheld a state law that required parental notification for minors seeking an abortion?

  1. Planned Parenthood v. Casey

  2. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt

  3. Gonzales v. Carhart

  4. Stenberg v. Carhart
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Planned Parenthood v. Casey that states can require parental notification for minors seeking an abortion, but cannot impose an undue burden on a woman's right to obtain an abortion.

Multiple choice

In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court strike down a state law that prohibited the sale of contraceptives to unmarried people?

  1. Eisenstadt v. Baird

  2. Griswold v. Connecticut

  3. Loving v. Virginia

  4. Roe v. Wade
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Eisenstadt v. Baird that states cannot prohibit the sale of contraceptives to unmarried people.

Multiple choice

Which case in 1989 held that states cannot criminalize sodomy, recognizing the right to privacy in one's sexual conduct?

  1. Bowers v. Hardwick

  2. Lawrence v. Texas

  3. Romer v. Evans

  4. Obergefell v. Hodges
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

In 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. Texas that states cannot criminalize sodomy, as this violates the right to privacy.

Multiple choice

In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court strike down a state law that prohibited women from serving as jurors?

  1. Stanton v. Stanton

  2. Reed v. Reed

  3. Hoyt v. Florida

  4. Taylor v. Louisiana
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Stanton v. Stanton that states cannot prohibit women from serving as jurors.

Multiple choice

Which case in 1972 established the principle of equal protection under the law for women, striking down a state law that favored men over women in jury selection?

  1. Reed v. Reed

  2. Frontiero v. Richardson

  3. Eisenstadt v. Baird

  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In 1971, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Reed v. Reed that states cannot discriminate against women in jury selection.

Multiple choice

In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court strike down a state law that prohibited women from working in certain jobs, such as bartending?

  1. Goesaert v. Cleary

  2. Craig v. Boren

  3. Kirchberg v. Feenstra

  4. Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In 1948, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Goesaert v. Cleary that states cannot prohibit women from working in certain jobs, such as bartending.

Multiple choice

Which federal law is the primary source of funding for early intervention services?

  1. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)

  2. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)

  3. Head Start Act

  4. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA)
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

IDEA is the primary source of funding for early intervention services for children with disabilities from birth to age 3.

Multiple choice

Which landmark Supreme Court case upheld the constitutionality of school vouchers?

  1. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)

  2. Flores v. United States (1997)

  3. Bush v. Gore (2000)

  4. Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the Supreme Court ruled that a school voucher program in Cleveland, Ohio, did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as it provided parents with a genuine choice between religious and secular schools.

Multiple choice

What is the primary federal law governing the conduct of federal elections?

  1. The Help America Vote Act

  2. The Voting Rights Act

  3. The Federal Election Campaign Act

  4. The National Voter Registration Act
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) is the primary federal law governing the conduct of federal elections. It regulates campaign finance, including contributions and expenditures, and sets limits on how much money candidates and political parties can spend on their campaigns.

Multiple choice

What is the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case?

  1. A case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of campaign finance regulations

  2. A case in which the Supreme Court struck down the constitutionality of campaign finance regulations

  3. A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that corporations have the same free speech rights as individuals

  4. A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that unions have the same free speech rights as individuals
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court ruled that corporations have the same free speech rights as individuals. The Court's decision in Citizens United has had a significant impact on campaign finance law, as it has allowed corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns.

Multiple choice

What is the McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission case?

  1. A case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of campaign finance regulations

  2. A case in which the Supreme Court struck down the constitutionality of campaign finance regulations

  3. A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that corporations have the same free speech rights as individuals

  4. A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that unions have the same free speech rights as individuals
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission is a case in which the Supreme Court struck down the constitutionality of campaign finance regulations that limited the amount of money that individuals could contribute to political candidates and parties. The Court's decision in McCutcheon has made it easier for wealthy individuals to influence elections.

Multiple choice

What is the Shelby County v. Holder case?

  1. A case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act

  2. A case in which the Supreme Court struck down the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act

  3. A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that states could not require voters to show photo identification

  4. A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that states could not purge voter rolls
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Shelby County v. Holder is a case in which the Supreme Court struck down the constitutionality of a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. The provision in question required states with a history of racial discrimination in voting to obtain federal approval before changing their voting laws. The Court's decision in Shelby County has made it easier for states to implement voting restrictions that disproportionately affect minority voters.

Multiple choice

What is the Texas v. White case?

  1. A case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act

  2. A case in which the Supreme Court struck down the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act

  3. A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that states could not require voters to show photo identification

  4. A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that states could not purge voter rolls
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Texas v. White is a case in which the Supreme Court ruled that states could not require voters to show photo identification in order to vote. The Court's decision in Texas v. White was based on the fact that such a requirement would disproportionately burden minority voters, who are less likely to have photo identification.

Multiple choice

What is the Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute case?

  1. A case in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act

  2. A case in which the Supreme Court struck down the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act

  3. A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that states could not require voters to show photo identification

  4. A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that states could not purge voter rolls
Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute is a case in which the Supreme Court ruled that states could not purge voter rolls based on a failure to vote. The Court's decision in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute was based on the fact that such a purge would disproportionately burden minority voters, who are more likely to move frequently and to have their voter registration cancelled as a result.