Sentence Improvement Questions

Multiple choice
  1. have not a decent

  2. had not have a decent

  3. had not had a decent

  4. No improvement needed

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Taking a meal can also be written as 'having a meal', and for the past we use 'had a meal'. In option 3rd, the first 'had' is used as an auxilary for time referral, and the other 'had' is used as 'having/eating'.

Multiple choice
  1. Thirty eight years from now

  2. Since thirty eight years

  3. Thirty eight years ago

  4. No improvement needed

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

To refer to a specific point of time in the past, we use 'ago'. So, option 3 is the right option.

Multiple choice
  1. He pressed at with his enquiries

  2. He pressed on with his enquiries

  3. He pressed after with his enquiries

  4. No improvement needed

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Case of idiomatic usage. The sentence implies that he puts his best to identify the core reason for the panis. 'Pressed on' is the right usage. It means 'to put pressure on someone or something'.

Multiple choice
  1. has

  2. have

  3. had

  4. No improvement needed

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Conceptual case. 'Is having' shows a verb of action, while 'has' shows a verb of being (here showing possession). Thus option 1.

Multiple choice
  1. were used

  2. had used

  3. was used

  4. No improvement needed

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The sentence mentions a fact of the past. In such cases, verb of action is changed into verb of being. 'Was/were + third form of the verb is used'. Here the subjects (i.e. methods) is a plural noun, hence, option 1.

Multiple choice
  1. has haunting

  2. had haunting

  3. has been haunting

  4. No improvement needed

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Case of present perfect continuous tense. 'Has and had' take third form of the verb and not the gerund form. Thus, option 1 & 2 eliminated. It being a case of present perfect continuous tense, option 3 is the right choice.

Multiple choice
  1. despite

  2. in spite

  3. nevertheless

  4. No improvement required

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Inspite needs to be followed by 'of'. So, option 2 cannot be used. Normally 'nevertheless' is placed in the beginning of the sentence. So, option 3 is ruled out. As option 1 is correct, option 4 is ruled out.

Multiple choice
  1. what maybe the consequences

  2. what will the consequences be

  3. what the consequences are

  4. No improvement required

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

In an indirect question or a clause following a statement, the subject should precede the verb. Thus, 'what the consequences are' is the correct word order.

Multiple choice
  1. since

  2. as

  3. because

  4. No improvement required

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The sentence is grammatically correct as written. 'Therefore' is an appropriate conjunctive adverb to connect the two independent clauses.

Multiple choice
  1. at all

  2. after all

  3. whole

  4. No improvement required

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The sentence is grammatically correct. The word 'all' serves as a pronoun referring back to 'the few books' to emphasize that every one of them was written by hand.

Multiple choice
  1. had won

  2. has won

  3. has been won

  4. No improvement required

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The sentence uses past tense ('told'), so the reported action must also be in the past perfect tense ('had won') to indicate an action completed before the time of telling.

Multiple choice
  1. In formerly days a teacher was expected to be an exceptional man of knowledge or wisdom

  2. In days a teacher was formerly expected to be a man of exceptional knowledge or wisdom

  3. In former days a teacher was expected to be an exceptional man of knowledge or wisdom

  4. In former days a teacher was expected to be a man of exceptional knowledge or wisdom

  5. No improvement

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

 Here, the use of adjective 'former' rectifies the error of using 'formerly'. Adverb qualifies an adjective, a verb and another adverb not a noun.In the original sentence the adverb 'formerly' qualifies the noun 'days' and it is a wrong use. Here, adjective 'former' qualifies the noun 'days'. Adjective is a word that qualifies a noun.    

Multiple choice
  1. the church's exclusively prerogative, with the result that there was little progress

  2. the church's exclusive prerogative, with the result that there was little progress

  3. the exclusive prerogative of the church, with the result that there was little progress

  4. the prerogative of the church, with the exclusive result that there was little progress

  5. No improvement.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

 Here, 'exclusive' rectifies the error of using 'exclusively'. Adverb does not qualifies a noun. But in the original sentence the adverb 'exclusively' qualifies the noun 'prerogative' and it is a wrong use. Here, the adjective 'exclusive' qualifies the noun 'prerogative'.Adjective is a word that qualifies a noun.

Multiple choice
  1. of what Assange did, it would have found a fair numbers of buyers for its argument.

  2. of what Assange did, it would have found a fair number of buyers for its argument.

  3. which Assange did, it may found a fair number of buyers for its argument.

  4. which Assange did, it would have found a fair number of buyers for its argument.

  5. No improvement.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

 Here, 'would have' rectifies the error of using 'may'.The structure 'if....had' is always followed by 'would have'.

Multiple choice
  1. When swelling of gums and prolonged pain may be an indication of leukemia,

  2. When swelling of gums and prolonged pain may be an indicator of leukemia,

  3. While swelling and prolonged pain of gums may be an indication of leukemia,

  4. When swelling and prolonged pain of gums may be an indicator of leukemia,

  5. No improvement.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

 'Indication' and 'of gums' rectify the errors. Here, 'indication' refers to the 'symptom of disease'. 'Of' and 'gums'  are properly placed.