English Language
Sentence Improvement
821 Questions
Sentence Improvement Questions
-
looking out
-
looking for
-
looking after
-
looked forward to
-
No correction required
B
Correct answer
Explanation
The sentence describes someone actively trying to find something specific. 'Looking for' is the correct phrasal verb meaning to search or seek something. 'Looked at' is grammatically incorrect as the main verb, while 'looking out' means watching for danger, 'looking after' means caring for, and 'looked forward to' means anticipating with pleasure.
-
why you had failed
-
because you have failed
-
that your failure
-
where you were failed
-
No correction required
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The sentence requires the past perfect tense to show an action completed before another past action ('ensure'). 'Why you had failed' correctly uses the past perfect to indicate that understanding past failures occurred before ensuring they don't repeat. The original 'why your failure' is a noun phrase clause and grammatically incorrect in this context.
-
were much demand
-
are lots of demand
-
demanded much
-
will be lot to demand
-
No correction required
E
Correct answer
Explanation
'Much in demand' is a correct idiomatic expression meaning highly sought after or popular. The phrase is grammatically sound as written, requiring no correction. None of the suggested alternatives ('were much demand,' 'are lots of demand,' 'demanded much,' 'will be lot to demand') are grammatically correct idiomatic expressions.
-
minister's visit
-
minister is visiting
-
minister's visit is
-
visit of the Minister
-
No correction required
C
Correct answer
Explanation
The sentence explains that traffic is restricted because of the minister's scheduled visit. 'Minister visit' lacks the necessary possessive ('minister's visit') and the verb 'is' is missing. The full phrase should read 'since the minister's visit is scheduled today' to be grammatically complete.
-
quite expensive and
-
too expensive for
-
so expensive but
-
more expensive
-
No correction required
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The sentence uses a 'so...that' construction to show cause and effect: the treatment was SO expensive THAT they had to sell their land. 'Very expensive that' is grammatically incorrect. 'Quite expensive and' properly connects two related facts with correct conjunction usage.
-
Polishing her new
-
Polishing she's new
-
Polishing her's new
-
Polishing Ayesha's new
-
No correction required
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The sentence has 'polishing hers new' which is grammatically incorrect. 'Hers' is a possessive pronoun (standing alone), but we need the possessive adjective 'her' before a noun. The correction is 'polishing her new audio system'. Option A fixes this correctly.
-
She grown up
-
She grews up
-
She grew up
-
She growned up
-
No correction required
C
Correct answer
Explanation
The sentence has 'she grows up' (present) with 'became' (past), creating tense inconsistency. Since 'became' is past tense, the first part should also be past: 'she grew up'. Option C provides the correct past tense form to match the sentence structure.
-
Those are always
-
These are always
-
They keep always
-
There are always
-
No correction required
E
Correct answer
Explanation
The sentence 'they are always late' is grammatically correct. 'They' refers back to Sneha and Shraddha, and the present continuous 'are always' correctly describes a recurring state or behavior. No correction is needed.
-
Were aware for
-
Was aware for of
-
Was aware for
-
Were aware of
-
No correction required
D
Correct answer
Explanation
The sentence uses 'neither...nor' construction with 'was aware of'. When using 'neither X nor Y', the verb agrees with the closest subject. Since 'police authorities' is plural, we need 'were aware of', not 'was'. Option D corrects the subject-verb agreement error.
-
did invested a
-
has invested a
-
did investing in a
-
had invested an
-
No correction required
B
Correct answer
Explanation
Everyone is a singular indefinite pronoun, so it requires the singular verb 'has' instead of 'have'. The past perfect 'had' (option D) would place the action too far in the past context, and 'did invested' (option A) is grammatically incorrect as 'did' requires the base form 'invest'. 'No correction required' is incorrect since the sentence has a subject-verb agreement error.
-
with the matter
-
at the matter
-
the matter
-
No improvement
C
Correct answer
Explanation
Correct sentence is 'The police investigated the matter'.
-
was living
-
shall live
-
have been living
-
No improvement
C
Correct answer
Explanation
The sentence makes sense in present perfect continuous tense.
-
has been
-
was
-
had been
-
No improvement
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The sentence makes sense in present perfect tense. We use present perfect for something that started in the past and continues in the present.
-
since
-
about
-
on
-
No improvement
A
Correct answer
Explanation
We use 'since' when a start time is mentioned. 'For' is used when duration is mentioned. With 'from' we use 'to' to specify a period.
-
am you
-
were you
-
had been you
-
No improvement
B
Correct answer
Explanation
We use 'were' in subjunctive mood. The subjunctive is the mood of a verb expressing wishes, stipulating demands, or making statements contrary to fact.