Biology

Plant Biology and Classification

1,473 Questions

Plant Biology and Classification deals with the taxonomy, evolution, and morphological features of the plant kingdom. This collection offers practice questions on plant groups, taxonomic hierarchies, and specific plant characteristics. The questions are tailored for students preparing for biology competitive exams.

Plant taxonomyPteridophytesAngiospermsPlant morphologyAlgae and bryophytesClassification systems

Plant Biology and Classification Questions

Multiple choice
  1. Monera

  2. Animalia

  3. Plantae

  4. Protista

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Kingdom Animalia is characterized by eukaryotic and heterotrophic organisms.

Multiple choice
  1. Kingdom, division, phylum, genus and species

  2. Phylum, kingdom, genus and class

  3. Kingdom, genus, class, phylum and division

  4. Phylum, kingdom, genus, species and class

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Order of classification is KingdomPhylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species.

Multiple choice
  1. Natural system

  2. Artificial system

  3. Phylogenetic system

  4. Asexual system

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Artificial system includes the ordering of organisms into groups on the basis of non-evolutionary features.

Multiple choice
  1. Desert plants

  2. Mesophytes

  3. Aquatic plants

  4. Terrestrial plants

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Different animals and plants have habitant in different regions depending upon their body structure and adaptability. E.g. animals like Yak, Lions, ants live on ground and are known as terrestrial animals. Animals like fish, whales, sharks live in water and are known as aquatic animals crab is an animal which is generally found on the sea shores or beaches as it is neither completely terrestrial nor aquatic.

Multiple choice
  1. autotroph

  2. saprotroph

  3. symbiont

  4. parasite

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Cuscuta is a parasite which obtains its nourishment from living hosts.

Multiple choice
  1. shrubs

  2. herbs

  3. algae

  4. trees

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

 Grana are absent in the chloroplast of algae.They have starch-accumulating structures called pyrenoids.

Multiple choice
  1. Algae and fungi

  2. Fungi and ferns

  3. Algae and ferns

  4. Only algae

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

fact

Multiple choice

In paragraph 4, the author states that

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.

SALAMANDERS AND SPECIES NAMES

 When reviewing the current journals of taxonomy, the science of organizing animals into neat little classifications, it is important to remember that names are a human convenience. Nature is not concerned with putting her creations into simple and objective categories. The classifications that we now have are the result of the scientists’ need to put some sort of order into what is a very chaotic situation. And although taxonomists have the best intentions when naming and classifying new or existing species, there are many occasions when naming a species causes quite a bit of confusion.

An excellent example of the problem with naming species is the case of Ensatina, a genus of salamander found in the Central Valley area of California. Central Valley is about 40 miles wide, and although salamanders do not live in the valley itself, they are found in the forests and mountains that ring the valley. At the southern tip of the valley live two distinct types of salamander—one salamander is characterized by its yellow and black spots, whereas the other is light brown in color and has no spots.

(A <) In biology, a species is typically defined as a group of animals that breed only with one another. (B <) Thus, any two animals that can breed belong to the same species, whereas animals that are unable to breed with one another are of a different species. (C <) The two Central Valley salamanders do not interbreed, which would seem to make it pretty clear that the salamanders should be classified as different species. (D <)

 But there is one interesting problem with these salamanders. A number of other salamanders inhabit the ring surrounding Central Valley. Moving north along the eastern side of the valley, the salamanders have fewer and fewer blotches. At the northern end of the valley, the salamanders appear to be a mixture of the two species; these salamanders are mostly brown, but they still have visible blotches.

Now, moving south along the western end of the valley, the salamanders have blotches that are more and more pronounced. Finally, by the time the southern tip of the valley is reached, the salamanders fully resemble the yellow and black spotted species. The salamanders in effect form an almost continuous ring around the outside of the Central Valley, and although the two distinct species at the “ends” of the ring do not interbreed, the salamanders can and do breed with “the intermediates” along the ring So although it is fairly clear that the salamanders at the ends of the ring are distinct species, what of the other salamanders found around the valley?

This situation presents quite a problem in classification. Most taxonomists have decided that the best solution is to put each of the intermediary salamanders into its own subspecies. However, this messy solution results in ten different species names for a salamander that is found only in the Central Valley. One can imagine how such a solution, applied to other species, could result in hundreds of thousands of subspecies for each species.

Further complicating the situation is the new evidence from genetic studies. It appears that the salamanders in Central Valley are all rather closely related, meaning that they all probably evolved from a common ancestor. A likely scenario is that the ancestral salamander species arrived at either the northern or southern tip of the valley and dispersed from there, with the offspring moving farther and farther down the eastern and western sides of the valley. In any case, the genetic evidence indicates a continuous gene flow along the Central Valley.

The case of the Central Valley salamander, sometimes called a ‘ring species,” is not unique. The salamander shows the difficulty of attempting to place animals into neat compartments although classification may be helpful to scientists and researchers, it is not a primary concern of the animals themselves—the salamander certainly doesn’t care what species it belongs to! Still despite the problems with the current taxonomic system it is admittedly useful. There is simply no other consistent way to label or classify the gradations found in nature, so the use of distinct species names will continue.
  1. many different species of salamanders live along the Central Valley

  2. salamanders along the western end of the valley have fewer spots

  3. salamanders found at the northern end of the valley cannot interbreed with salamanders found at the southern end

  4. the range of salamanders found along the valley presents a difficulty

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The first line of paragraph 4 lead us to answer (4).

Multiple choice

In paragraph 7, the author provides information about genetic studies to

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.

SALAMANDERS AND SPECIES NAMES

 When reviewing the current journals of taxonomy, the science of organizing animals into neat little classifications, it is important to remember that names are a human convenience. Nature is not concerned with putting her creations into simple and objective categories. The classifications that we now have are the result of the scientists’ need to put some sort of order into what is a very chaotic situation. And although taxonomists have the best intentions when naming and classifying new or existing species, there are many occasions when naming a species causes quite a bit of confusion.

An excellent example of the problem with naming species is the case of Ensatina, a genus of salamander found in the Central Valley area of California. Central Valley is about 40 miles wide, and although salamanders do not live in the valley itself, they are found in the forests and mountains that ring the valley. At the southern tip of the valley live two distinct types of salamander—one salamander is characterized by its yellow and black spots, whereas the other is light brown in color and has no spots.

(A <) In biology, a species is typically defined as a group of animals that breed only with one another. (B <) Thus, any two animals that can breed belong to the same species, whereas animals that are unable to breed with one another are of a different species. (C <) The two Central Valley salamanders do not interbreed, which would seem to make it pretty clear that the salamanders should be classified as different species. (D <)

 But there is one interesting problem with these salamanders. A number of other salamanders inhabit the ring surrounding Central Valley. Moving north along the eastern side of the valley, the salamanders have fewer and fewer blotches. At the northern end of the valley, the salamanders appear to be a mixture of the two species; these salamanders are mostly brown, but they still have visible blotches.

Now, moving south along the western end of the valley, the salamanders have blotches that are more and more pronounced. Finally, by the time the southern tip of the valley is reached, the salamanders fully resemble the yellow and black spotted species. The salamanders in effect form an almost continuous ring around the outside of the Central Valley, and although the two distinct species at the “ends” of the ring do not interbreed, the salamanders can and do breed with “the intermediates” along the ring So although it is fairly clear that the salamanders at the ends of the ring are distinct species, what of the other salamanders found around the valley?

This situation presents quite a problem in classification. Most taxonomists have decided that the best solution is to put each of the intermediary salamanders into its own subspecies. However, this messy solution results in ten different species names for a salamander that is found only in the Central Valley. One can imagine how such a solution, applied to other species, could result in hundreds of thousands of subspecies for each species.

Further complicating the situation is the new evidence from genetic studies. It appears that the salamanders in Central Valley are all rather closely related, meaning that they all probably evolved from a common ancestor. A likely scenario is that the ancestral salamander species arrived at either the northern or southern tip of the valley and dispersed from there, with the offspring moving farther and farther down the eastern and western sides of the valley. In any case, the genetic evidence indicates a continuous gene flow along the Central Valley.

The case of the Central Valley salamander, sometimes called a ‘ring species,” is not unique. The salamander shows the difficulty of attempting to place animals into neat compartments although classification may be helpful to scientists and researchers, it is not a primary concern of the animals themselves—the salamander certainly doesn’t care what species it belongs to! Still despite the problems with the current taxonomic system it is admittedly useful. There is simply no other consistent way to label or classify the gradations found in nature, so the use of distinct species names will continue.
  1. suggest that researchers have ignored a crucial piece of evidence

  2. support an earlier assertion about the problem with classification

  3. argue that new studies will eventually prove that the salamanders are part of the same species

  4. assert that the presence of a common ancestor is the most likely explanation for the different types of salamanders found in the valley

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

It appears that the author mentions the genetic studies because they “further complicate” the situation. Therefore, answer choice (2) makes most sense.

Multiple choice

Directions: Choose the word nearest in meaning from the given options for the word genus in the passage.

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.

SALAMANDERS AND SPECIES NAMES

 When reviewing the current journals of taxonomy, the science of organizing animals into neat little classifications, it is important to remember that names are a human convenience. Nature is not concerned with putting her creations into simple and objective categories. The classifications that we now have are the result of the scientists’ need to put some sort of order into what is a very chaotic situation. And although taxonomists have the best intentions when naming and classifying new or existing species, there are many occasions when naming a species causes quite a bit of confusion.

An excellent example of the problem with naming species is the case of Ensatina, a genus of salamander found in the Central Valley area of California. Central Valley is about 40 miles wide, and although salamanders do not live in the valley itself, they are found in the forests and mountains that ring the valley. At the southern tip of the valley live two distinct types of salamander—one salamander is characterized by its yellow and black spots, whereas the other is light brown in color and has no spots.

(A <) In biology, a species is typically defined as a group of animals that breed only with one another. (B <) Thus, any two animals that can breed belong to the same species, whereas animals that are unable to breed with one another are of a different species. (C <) The two Central Valley salamanders do not interbreed, which would seem to make it pretty clear that the salamanders should be classified as different species. (D <)

 But there is one interesting problem with these salamanders. A number of other salamanders inhabit the ring surrounding Central Valley. Moving north along the eastern side of the valley, the salamanders have fewer and fewer blotches. At the northern end of the valley, the salamanders appear to be a mixture of the two species; these salamanders are mostly brown, but they still have visible blotches.

Now, moving south along the western end of the valley, the salamanders have blotches that are more and more pronounced. Finally, by the time the southern tip of the valley is reached, the salamanders fully resemble the yellow and black spotted species. The salamanders in effect form an almost continuous ring around the outside of the Central Valley, and although the two distinct species at the “ends” of the ring do not interbreed, the salamanders can and do breed with “the intermediates” along the ring So although it is fairly clear that the salamanders at the ends of the ring are distinct species, what of the other salamanders found around the valley?

This situation presents quite a problem in classification. Most taxonomists have decided that the best solution is to put each of the intermediary salamanders into its own subspecies. However, this messy solution results in ten different species names for a salamander that is found only in the Central Valley. One can imagine how such a solution, applied to other species, could result in hundreds of thousands of subspecies for each species.

Further complicating the situation is the new evidence from genetic studies. It appears that the salamanders in Central Valley are all rather closely related, meaning that they all probably evolved from a common ancestor. A likely scenario is that the ancestral salamander species arrived at either the northern or southern tip of the valley and dispersed from there, with the offspring moving farther and farther down the eastern and western sides of the valley. In any case, the genetic evidence indicates a continuous gene flow along the Central Valley.

The case of the Central Valley salamander, sometimes called a ‘ring species,” is not unique. The salamander shows the difficulty of attempting to place animals into neat compartments although classification may be helpful to scientists and researchers, it is not a primary concern of the animals themselves—the salamander certainly doesn’t care what species it belongs to! Still despite the problems with the current taxonomic system it is admittedly useful. There is simply no other consistent way to label or classify the gradations found in nature, so the use of distinct species names will continue.
  1. Kind

  2. Color

  3. Location

  4. Qualityc

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The passage refers to “two distinct types of salamander”. This is what the blank is referring to.

Multiple choice

The phrase the intermediates refers to

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.

SALAMANDERS AND SPECIES NAMES

 When reviewing the current journals of taxonomy, the science of organizing animals into neat little classifications, it is important to remember that names are a human convenience. Nature is not concerned with putting her creations into simple and objective categories. The classifications that we now have are the result of the scientists’ need to put some sort of order into what is a very chaotic situation. And although taxonomists have the best intentions when naming and classifying new or existing species, there are many occasions when naming a species causes quite a bit of confusion.

An excellent example of the problem with naming species is the case of Ensatina, a genus of salamander found in the Central Valley area of California. Central Valley is about 40 miles wide, and although salamanders do not live in the valley itself, they are found in the forests and mountains that ring the valley. At the southern tip of the valley live two distinct types of salamander—one salamander is characterized by its yellow and black spots, whereas the other is light brown in color and has no spots.

(A <) In biology, a species is typically defined as a group of animals that breed only with one another. (B <) Thus, any two animals that can breed belong to the same species, whereas animals that are unable to breed with one another are of a different species. (C <) The two Central Valley salamanders do not interbreed, which would seem to make it pretty clear that the salamanders should be classified as different species. (D <)

 But there is one interesting problem with these salamanders. A number of other salamanders inhabit the ring surrounding Central Valley. Moving north along the eastern side of the valley, the salamanders have fewer and fewer blotches. At the northern end of the valley, the salamanders appear to be a mixture of the two species; these salamanders are mostly brown, but they still have visible blotches.

Now, moving south along the western end of the valley, the salamanders have blotches that are more and more pronounced. Finally, by the time the southern tip of the valley is reached, the salamanders fully resemble the yellow and black spotted species. The salamanders in effect form an almost continuous ring around the outside of the Central Valley, and although the two distinct species at the “ends” of the ring do not interbreed, the salamanders can and do breed with “the intermediates” along the ring So although it is fairly clear that the salamanders at the ends of the ring are distinct species, what of the other salamanders found around the valley?

This situation presents quite a problem in classification. Most taxonomists have decided that the best solution is to put each of the intermediary salamanders into its own subspecies. However, this messy solution results in ten different species names for a salamander that is found only in the Central Valley. One can imagine how such a solution, applied to other species, could result in hundreds of thousands of subspecies for each species.

Further complicating the situation is the new evidence from genetic studies. It appears that the salamanders in Central Valley are all rather closely related, meaning that they all probably evolved from a common ancestor. A likely scenario is that the ancestral salamander species arrived at either the northern or southern tip of the valley and dispersed from there, with the offspring moving farther and farther down the eastern and western sides of the valley. In any case, the genetic evidence indicates a continuous gene flow along the Central Valley.

The case of the Central Valley salamander, sometimes called a ‘ring species,” is not unique. The salamander shows the difficulty of attempting to place animals into neat compartments although classification may be helpful to scientists and researchers, it is not a primary concern of the animals themselves—the salamander certainly doesn’t care what species it belongs to! Still despite the problems with the current taxonomic system it is admittedly useful. There is simply no other consistent way to label or classify the gradations found in nature, so the use of distinct species names will continue.
  1. salamanders found outside the Central Valley ring

  2. distinct species of salamanders found only in the Central Valley

  3. a range of salamanders that do not fit neatly into a species classification

  4. salamanders found at the ends of the “ring” around the Central Valley

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

What must the salamanders breed with? Other salamanders. Which salamanders are they? Because the two species at the “ends” of the ring “do not interbreed”, the ones not at the ends must do so.

Multiple choice

The word admittedly as used in the passage is closest to

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.

SALAMANDERS AND SPECIES NAMES

 When reviewing the current journals of taxonomy, the science of organizing animals into neat little classifications, it is important to remember that names are a human convenience. Nature is not concerned with putting her creations into simple and objective categories. The classifications that we now have are the result of the scientists’ need to put some sort of order into what is a very chaotic situation. And although taxonomists have the best intentions when naming and classifying new or existing species, there are many occasions when naming a species causes quite a bit of confusion.

An excellent example of the problem with naming species is the case of Ensatina, a genus of salamander found in the Central Valley area of California. Central Valley is about 40 miles wide, and although salamanders do not live in the valley itself, they are found in the forests and mountains that ring the valley. At the southern tip of the valley live two distinct types of salamander—one salamander is characterized by its yellow and black spots, whereas the other is light brown in color and has no spots.

(A <) In biology, a species is typically defined as a group of animals that breed only with one another. (B <) Thus, any two animals that can breed belong to the same species, whereas animals that are unable to breed with one another are of a different species. (C <) The two Central Valley salamanders do not interbreed, which would seem to make it pretty clear that the salamanders should be classified as different species. (D <)

 But there is one interesting problem with these salamanders. A number of other salamanders inhabit the ring surrounding Central Valley. Moving north along the eastern side of the valley, the salamanders have fewer and fewer blotches. At the northern end of the valley, the salamanders appear to be a mixture of the two species; these salamanders are mostly brown, but they still have visible blotches.

Now, moving south along the western end of the valley, the salamanders have blotches that are more and more pronounced. Finally, by the time the southern tip of the valley is reached, the salamanders fully resemble the yellow and black spotted species. The salamanders in effect form an almost continuous ring around the outside of the Central Valley, and although the two distinct species at the “ends” of the ring do not interbreed, the salamanders can and do breed with “the intermediates” along the ring So although it is fairly clear that the salamanders at the ends of the ring are distinct species, what of the other salamanders found around the valley?

This situation presents quite a problem in classification. Most taxonomists have decided that the best solution is to put each of the intermediary salamanders into its own subspecies. However, this messy solution results in ten different species names for a salamander that is found only in the Central Valley. One can imagine how such a solution, applied to other species, could result in hundreds of thousands of subspecies for each species.

Further complicating the situation is the new evidence from genetic studies. It appears that the salamanders in Central Valley are all rather closely related, meaning that they all probably evolved from a common ancestor. A likely scenario is that the ancestral salamander species arrived at either the northern or southern tip of the valley and dispersed from there, with the offspring moving farther and farther down the eastern and western sides of the valley. In any case, the genetic evidence indicates a continuous gene flow along the Central Valley.

The case of the Central Valley salamander, sometimes called a ‘ring species,” is not unique. The salamander shows the difficulty of attempting to place animals into neat compartments although classification may be helpful to scientists and researchers, it is not a primary concern of the animals themselves—the salamander certainly doesn’t care what species it belongs to! Still despite the problems with the current taxonomic system it is admittedly useful. There is simply no other consistent way to label or classify the gradations found in nature, so the use of distinct species names will continue.
  1. precisely

  2. literally

  3. certainly

  4. rarely

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

The relevant sentence says that “despite the problems”, the system is the only “consistent way to label or classify”. Our word for the blank should support the idea that the system works. Only answer choice (3) works.

Multiple choice

Based on the information in paragraph 1, which of the following can be properly inferred?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.

SALAMANDERS AND SPECIES NAMES

 When reviewing the current journals of taxonomy, the science of organizing animals into neat little classifications, it is important to remember that names are a human convenience. Nature is not concerned with putting her creations into simple and objective categories. The classifications that we now have are the result of the scientists’ need to put some sort of order into what is a very chaotic situation. And although taxonomists have the best intentions when naming and classifying new or existing species, there are many occasions when naming a species causes quite a bit of confusion.

An excellent example of the problem with naming species is the case of Ensatina, a genus of salamander found in the Central Valley area of California. Central Valley is about 40 miles wide, and although salamanders do not live in the valley itself, they are found in the forests and mountains that ring the valley. At the southern tip of the valley live two distinct types of salamander—one salamander is characterized by its yellow and black spots, whereas the other is light brown in color and has no spots.

(A <) In biology, a species is typically defined as a group of animals that breed only with one another. (B <) Thus, any two animals that can breed belong to the same species, whereas animals that are unable to breed with one another are of a different species. (C <) The two Central Valley salamanders do not interbreed, which would seem to make it pretty clear that the salamanders should be classified as different species. (D <)

 But there is one interesting problem with these salamanders. A number of other salamanders inhabit the ring surrounding Central Valley. Moving north along the eastern side of the valley, the salamanders have fewer and fewer blotches. At the northern end of the valley, the salamanders appear to be a mixture of the two species; these salamanders are mostly brown, but they still have visible blotches.

Now, moving south along the western end of the valley, the salamanders have blotches that are more and more pronounced. Finally, by the time the southern tip of the valley is reached, the salamanders fully resemble the yellow and black spotted species. The salamanders in effect form an almost continuous ring around the outside of the Central Valley, and although the two distinct species at the “ends” of the ring do not interbreed, the salamanders can and do breed with “the intermediates” along the ring So although it is fairly clear that the salamanders at the ends of the ring are distinct species, what of the other salamanders found around the valley?

This situation presents quite a problem in classification. Most taxonomists have decided that the best solution is to put each of the intermediary salamanders into its own subspecies. However, this messy solution results in ten different species names for a salamander that is found only in the Central Valley. One can imagine how such a solution, applied to other species, could result in hundreds of thousands of subspecies for each species.

Further complicating the situation is the new evidence from genetic studies. It appears that the salamanders in Central Valley are all rather closely related, meaning that they all probably evolved from a common ancestor. A likely scenario is that the ancestral salamander species arrived at either the northern or southern tip of the valley and dispersed from there, with the offspring moving farther and farther down the eastern and western sides of the valley. In any case, the genetic evidence indicates a continuous gene flow along the Central Valley.

The case of the Central Valley salamander, sometimes called a ‘ring species,” is not unique. The salamander shows the difficulty of attempting to place animals into neat compartments although classification may be helpful to scientists and researchers, it is not a primary concern of the animals themselves—the salamander certainly doesn’t care what species it belongs to! Still despite the problems with the current taxonomic system it is admittedly useful. There is simply no other consistent way to label or classify the gradations found in nature, so the use of distinct species names will continue.
  1. Nature's creations cannot be put into simple categories.

  2. Some scientists are concerned with sorting and arranging natural phenomena.

  3. Scientists do not agree on the value of taxonomy.

  4. The confusion caused by naming species is not worth the value gained from such a practice.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Answer (2) is correct because the passage says that taxonomy is the “science of organising animals” and that there is a “scientists' need to put some sort of order” Into the system.