Law Legal Studies · Civics Polity
Legal Principles and Doctrines
2,539 Questions
Legal principles and doctrines establish the foundational rules of jurisprudence and civil rights. Questions cover constitutional reasonable restrictions, courtroom evidence standards, and property laws. These topics are strictly necessary for law legal studies exams and judicial services prelims.
Constitutional doctrinesGuardianship rightsExpert testimony standardsCriminal trial instructionsContractual authorityRegistration law principles
Legal Principles and Doctrines Questions
-
Rescue cases
-
Statutory authority
-
Both 1 and 2
-
None of the above
C
Correct answer
Explanation
Volenti non fit injuria (voluntary assumption of risk) has key limitations. In rescue cases, a rescuer who intervenes to help someone who voluntarily took a risk cannot be volenti-barred from suing. Similarly, statutory authority provides a complete defense and overrides volenti. Both are recognized exceptions to the doctrine.
-
Privilege
-
Possession
-
Dut
-
Obligation
C
Correct answer
Explanation
The jural correlative of a right is a duty. In legal theory, every right corresponds to a duty owed by someone else. For instance, if you have a right to property, others have a duty not to interfere with it. This fundamental concept underpins the entire structure of legal rights and obligations in jurisprudence.
-
Right in Personal
-
Right in Rem
-
Either right in Personal or right in rem
-
Imperfect right
C
Correct answer
Explanation
A tort can violate either a right in personam (personal right) or a right in rem (right against the world). For example, trespass to land violates a right in rem, while defamation violates a right in personam. The key distinction is that rights in rem are available against the world at large, while rights in personam are enforceable only against specific individuals.
-
Writ of Mandamus
-
Writ of Certiorari
-
Writ of Quo warranto
-
Writ of Prohibition
C
Correct answer
Explanation
Quo warranto is the specific writ issued by the courts to prevent illegal usurpation of a public office. It literally means 'by what authority' and challenges the holder to show the legal basis for their claim to the office. Mandamus directs action, Certiorari quashes illegal orders, and Prohibition prevents lower courts from exceeding jurisdiction.
-
The thing speaks for itself
-
The thing speaks for others
-
The thing does not speak for itself
-
The thing is a Manifestation of others
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Res Ipsa Loquitur is a Latin maxim meaning 'the thing speaks for itself.' It is a doctrine in tort law where negligence can be inferred from the very nature of the accident or injury, without needing direct evidence of the defendant's breach of duty. It applies when the accident would not normally occur without negligence.
-
Doctrine of pith and substance
-
Doctrine of colourable legislation
-
Doctrine of ancillary powers
-
Doctrine of Implied powers
B
Correct answer
Explanation
The doctrine of colourable legislation states that what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. It prevents legislatures from achieving a prohibited end by indirect means when the direct means are forbidden. This ensures legislative bodies do not overstep their constitutional authority through clever drafting.
-
You approach your senior to find out the actual matter.
-
You submit your report without catering to any influence from your senior.
-
You conduct a sting operation so as the truth can be shown to the world.
-
you Approach your co-workers for guidance.
B
Correct answer
Explanation
Submitting your report independently (B) maintains professional integrity and ensures the fraud case is evaluated on merits, not influenced by senior's position. Approaching the senior (A) might lead to pressure, sting operations (C) are unauthorized, and seeking co-workers' guidance (D) avoids your responsibility.
-
Resign from your post and request for an internal inquiry into the matter.
-
Ignore the allegations as you are sure that there has been no mishandling of evidence.
-
Recommend the matter to the seniors in the department and wait for their response.
-
Hold a press conference to give an explanation to the media.
C
Correct answer
Explanation
Recommending to seniors (C) follows proper hierarchy and allows for institutional response. Resigning (A) is premature, ignoring allegations (B) doesn't address the crisis, and press conference (D) bypasses protocol. Seniors can provide guidance, support, and official response mechanisms.
-
right in rem
-
right in personam
-
right in re aliena
-
None of the above
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Right to reputation is a right in rem. A right in rem is available against the world at large. It is called “real right”.
-
a decision which ignores a statute on the subject
-
a decision which ignores the case law on the subject
-
a decision which ignores the constitution on the subject
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Per incuriam, literally translated as "through lack of care", refers to a judgment of a court, which has been decided without reference to a statutory provision or earlier judgment which would have been relevant.
-
Continuity
-
Originality
-
Certainty
-
Consistency
B
Correct answer
Explanation
The following are the essential elements of a custom:
- Antiquity
- Continuance
- Peaceable enjoyment
- Matter of right
- Certainty
- Consistency
- Conformity with statute law
-
When the person keeping silent is under ‘duty to speak’
-
When the silence is itself ‘equivalent to seech’
-
‘Half-truths’
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Mere silence as to facts does not amount to fraud. There is difference between active concealment and passive concealment.
-
Active concealment of a fact
-
A promise made without any intention of performing it
-
Suggestion as a fact of that which is not true by one who does not believe it to be true
-
A representation made without knowing it to be false, honestly believing it to be true
D
Correct answer
Explanation
For a statement to constitute a fraud, it must not only be made without an honest belief in the facts presented but must be made knowing it to be false or without belief in the truth of the false representation.
-
Sheras v. De-Rutzen
-
R v. Dudley & Stephen
-
Harding v. Price
-
R v. Prince
A
Correct answer
Explanation
“In every statute, mens-rea is to be implied unless the contrary is shown”. This view was expressed in the case of Sheras v. De-Rutzen.
-
Intention
-
Benefits or gains of the accused
-
Result
-
Both intention and result
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Law of sedition relates to the uttering of seditious words, the publication of seditious libels, and conspiracies to do an act for the furtherance of a seditious intention.