Law Legal Studies ยท Civics Polity
Legal Principles and Doctrines
2,539 Questions
Legal principles and doctrines establish the foundational rules of jurisprudence and civil rights. Questions cover constitutional reasonable restrictions, courtroom evidence standards, and property laws. These topics are strictly necessary for law legal studies exams and judicial services prelims.
Constitutional doctrinesGuardianship rightsExpert testimony standardsCriminal trial instructionsContractual authorityRegistration law principles
Legal Principles and Doctrines Questions
What is the purpose of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict?
-
To request the court to enter a judgment in favor of the moving party despite the jury's verdict
-
To request the court to order a new trial
-
To request the court to alter or amend the judgment
-
None of the above
A
Correct answer
Explanation
A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is filed to request the court to enter a judgment in favor of the moving party despite the jury's verdict.
What happens if a post-trial motion is granted?
-
The court will order a new trial
-
The court will enter a judgment in favor of the moving party
-
The court will alter or amend the judgment
-
Any of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
If a post-trial motion is granted, the court may order a new trial, enter a judgment in favor of the moving party, or alter or amend the judgment.
What happens if a post-trial motion is denied?
-
The judgment will become final
-
The moving party can appeal the decision
-
Both of the above
-
None of the above
C
Correct answer
Explanation
If a post-trial motion is denied, the judgment will become final and the moving party can appeal the decision.
What are some of the grounds for a motion for a new trial?
-
Errors in the trial process
-
Newly discovered evidence
-
A belief that the verdict is not supported by the evidence
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Some of the grounds for a motion for a new trial include errors in the trial process, newly discovered evidence, and a belief that the verdict is not supported by the evidence.
What are some of the grounds for a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict?
-
The moving party believes that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict
-
The moving party believes that the court erred in its instructions to the jury
-
The moving party believes that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Some of the grounds for a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict include the moving party's belief that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, that the court erred in its instructions to the jury, and that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence.
What are some of the grounds for a motion to alter or amend the judgment?
-
The judgment is based on a mistake of law
-
The judgment is based on a mistake of fact
-
The judgment is ambiguous
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Some of the grounds for a motion to alter or amend the judgment include the judgment being based on a mistake of law, a mistake of fact, or being ambiguous.
What is the standard of review for a post-trial motion?
-
Abuse of discretion
-
De novo review
-
Clearly erroneous
-
Plain error
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The standard of review for a post-trial motion is abuse of discretion.
What is the burden of proof for a post-trial motion?
-
The moving party must prove that the trial court erred
-
The non-moving party must prove that the trial court did not err
-
The burden of proof is the same for both parties
-
There is no burden of proof for a post-trial motion
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The burden of proof for a post-trial motion is on the moving party to prove that the trial court erred.
What are some of the common mistakes that attorneys make when filing post-trial motions?
-
Failing to file the motion within the deadline
-
Failing to properly serve the motion on the opposing party
-
Failing to include a supporting memorandum with the motion
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Some of the common mistakes that attorneys make when filing post-trial motions include failing to file the motion within the deadline, failing to properly serve the motion on the opposing party, and failing to include a supporting memorandum with the motion.
What is the typical scope of complaints handled by an Ombudsman?
-
Issues related to government services and decisions
-
Criminal matters
-
Private disputes between individuals
-
Tax-related issues
A
Correct answer
Explanation
Ombudsmen typically handle complaints that fall within the realm of public administration, such as delays in processing applications, unfair treatment by government officials, or incorrect decisions made by public agencies.
What is the typical outcome of an Ombudsman's investigation?
-
A recommendation for corrective action to the relevant public agency
-
A public report detailing the findings of the investigation
-
Compensation or restitution for the complainant
-
All of the above
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Depending on the findings of the investigation, an Ombudsman may recommend corrective action to the public agency involved, issue a public report, or seek compensation or restitution for the complainant.
Which of the following is NOT a type of due process?
-
Procedural due process
-
Substantive due process
-
Vague laws
-
Ex post facto laws
C
Correct answer
Explanation
Procedural due process and substantive due process are two types of due process. Vague laws and ex post facto laws are not types of due process.
Which of the following is NOT a type of ex post facto law?
-
Laws that make an action illegal that was not illegal at the time it was committed
-
Laws that increase the punishment for an action after it was committed
-
Laws that apply retroactively to pending cases
-
Laws that apply retroactively to completed cases
D
Correct answer
Explanation
Laws that make an action illegal that was not illegal at the time it was committed, laws that increase the punishment for an action after it was committed, and laws that apply retroactively to pending cases are all types of ex post facto laws. Laws that apply retroactively to completed cases are not ex post facto laws.
What is the best evidence rule?
-
The rule that requires the production of the original document or recording.
-
The rule that allows the admission of secondary evidence when the original is not available.
-
The rule that allows the admission of hearsay evidence when the declarant is unavailable.
-
The rule that allows the admission of expert testimony when the subject matter is beyond the understanding of the average juror.
A
Correct answer
Explanation
The best evidence rule is a rule of evidence that requires the production of the original document or recording of a writing or recording when it is offered as evidence in a legal proceeding. The purpose of the rule is to ensure that the evidence is accurate and reliable.
What are the exceptions to the best evidence rule?
-
When the original is lost or destroyed.
-
When the original is in the possession of the adverse party and cannot be obtained.
-
When the original is a public record.
-
All of the above.
D
Correct answer
Explanation
The exceptions to the best evidence rule include: when the original is lost or destroyed; when the original is in the possession of the adverse party and cannot be obtained; when the original is a public record; and when the evidence is a collateral matter.