Banking Financial Awareness · Economics

Financial Markets and Instruments

1,955 Questions

Financial markets and instruments cover mutual funds, risk management, portfolio optimization, and investment strategies. These topics are critical for banking and financial awareness sections in competitive exams. Practice these questions to understand operational risk, asset valuation, and market regulations.

Portfolio optimizationOperational risk managementMutual funds valuationInvestment income typesHedging strategies

Financial Markets and Instruments Questions

Multiple choice
  1. place

  2. transaction

  3. operations

  4. dealing

  5. work

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Place, dealing and work are out of context. Transaction means 'conducting business', but here we are talking about implementing the process of diversification. So, the correct option is (3). The area is 'limited' for carrying out the diversification 'operation'.

Multiple choice
  1. place

  2. transaction

  3. operations

  4. dealing

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Place, dealing and work are out of context. Transaction means 'conducting business', but here we are talking about implementing the process of diversification. So, the correct option is (3). The area is 'limited' for carrying out the diversification 'operation'.

Multiple choice
  1. luck

  2. fortune

  3. activities

  4. opportunities

  5. chance

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The passage is talking about process of diversification. The second part talks about limited area. Hence, opportunities is the correct answer as institutions get constrined only due to lack of opportunities. 

Multiple choice
  1. luck

  2. fortune

  3. activities

  4. opportunities

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

The passage is talking about process of diversification. The second part talks about limited area. Hence, opportunities is the correct answer as institutions get constrined only due to lack of opportunities. 

Multiple choice
  1. by

  2. onto

  3. for

  4. through

  5. at

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

As we are referring to a figurative movement through a system or process, so the correct answer is option 5 (through).

Multiple choice
  1. by

  2. onto

  3. for

  4. through

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

As we are referring to a figurative movement through a system or process, so the correct answer is option 5 (through).

Multiple choice
  1. kill

  2. lynch

  3. damage

  4. promote

  5. burn

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Increased securitisation can affect or damage client relationship. It cannot kill, lynch or burn. Promote is out of context as the sentence requires a negative word.

Multiple choice
  1. kill

  2. lynch

  3. damage

  4. promote

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Increased securitisation can affect or damage client relationship. It cannot kill, lynch or burn. Promote is out of context as the sentence requires a negative word.

Multiple choice
  1. watching

  2. mitigating

  3. taking

  4. affording

  5. seeing

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The passage is talking about managing credit risk. 'Mitigating means 'to lessen', which fits in with context of the sentence.

Multiple choice
  1. watching

  2. mitigating

  3. taking

  4. affording

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The passage is talking about managing credit risk. 'Mitigating means 'to lessen', which fits in with context of the sentence.

Multiple choice
  1. yester

  2. futuristic

  3. golden

  4. coming

  5. past

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

As the refernce is towards future years, the correct answer is 'coming' years.

Multiple choice
  1. yester

  2. futuristic

  3. golden

  4. coming

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

As the refernce is towards future years, the correct answer is 'coming' years.

Multiple choice
  1. gained

  2. sold

  3. valued

  4. bought

  5. profited

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

As per the sentence popularity of securitisation has increased. So, correct answer is 'gained'.

Multiple choice

Which of the following options cannot be inferred from the passage about managements of target firms prior to the current takeover frenzy?

  1. They used more imaginative tactics to resist takeovers.
  2. They were more concerned about shareholders' interests.
  3. They rarely took strong action to resist takeover attempts.

    Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

    The 1980s have come to be regarded as the decade of corporate consolidation in the United States, with the number of mergers and their dollar value both setting records. Many public forums have questioned, on both social and economic grounds, the merits of this takeover frenzy. Even more controversial than the mergers themselves, however, is the reaction of the management of target firms. No longer is management content to be passive or to put up minimal resistance in the face of an unwelcome takeover attempt. Indeed, the responses of target managements have become as imaginative as the methods used by the would–be acquirers. These so–called antitakeover tactics have received nearly universal condemnation from government regulatory bodies, the financial press, and some academic publications. Why is there so much criticism when management resists takeovers? At the most general level, such criticism is based on studies that find a negative return to shareholders when a negotiated (friendly) merger is unsuccessful. These studies examine the cumulative return from the period just prior to the first public announcement of the proposed merger through the announcement of cancellation. Results range from a total return of –9.02 per cent to + 3.68 per cent, with an average of –2.88 percent. In unsuccessful mergers, therefore, stockholders in target firms lose on average nearly 3 per cent of the shares' value.

    But looking at the returns only through the termination date can be misleading. Other studies examining the period from six months prior to an offer to six months after the offer have found that the total return averages nearly +36 per cent, even though the offer was unsuccessful. Given the typical stock market reaction to unsuccessful negotiated mergers, this is a curious finding. The explanation for this seeming anomaly emerges when firms are divided into two groups: those eventually acquired by some other bidder, and those not acquired. Firms that were not acquired eventually lost the entire 36 per cent return. But firms subsequently acquired, earned an additional 20 per cent return above the initial 36 per cent, earning shareholders a total return of 56 per cent. Those earnings compare favorably to the overall average return of 30 percent earned by shareholders & of all companies successfully acquired. These results suggest that some form of resistance by management may be desirable. Playing hard to get may influence the initial suitor to increase the bid, or it may permit time for competing bids to be submitted. It is possible, however, to have too much of a good thing. When management actions are designed solely to eliminate a takeover by a specific bidder, then shareholders may be harmed. Nevertheless, antitakeover tactics do not deserve the blanket condemnation they receive in the press.

     

  1. 1 only

  2. 1 and 2 only

  3. 2 and 3 only

  4. All of the above

  5. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Answer (2). (1) has been described being a tactic used during the 'takeover frenzy'. (2) has no base to support the passage.

Multiple choice

Which of the following options, if true, would most seriously weaken the author's conclusion about the benefits of management resistance to takeovers?

  1. A third category of mergers, comprising firms that underwent several unsuccessful bids before being acquired, shows a rate of return to shareholders somewhere between the rates for the other two categories.
  2. When acquisitions are studied over a two-year period, companies that resisted takeover attempts show the same return to shareholders as companies that did not resist.
  3. The 56 per cent return to shareholders earned when companies are acquired after an unsuccessful takeover bid, is an average that includes companies whose stock declined in value as well as companies whose stock gained in value.
  4. Of the companies whose managements resisted acquisition attempts, about fifty per cent experienced an increase in stock prices and fifty per cent suffered a decrease in stock prices.

    Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

    The 1980s have come to be regarded as the decade of corporate consolidation in the United States, with the number of mergers and their dollar value both setting records. Many public forums have questioned, on both social and economic grounds, the merits of this takeover frenzy. Even more controversial than the mergers themselves, however, is the reaction of the management of target firms. No longer is management content to be passive or to put up minimal resistance in the face of an unwelcome takeover attempt. Indeed, the responses of target managements have become as imaginative as the methods used by the would–be acquirers. These so–called antitakeover tactics have received nearly universal condemnation from government regulatory bodies, the financial press, and some academic publications. Why is there so much criticism when management resists takeovers? At the most general level, such criticism is based on studies that find a negative return to shareholders when a negotiated (friendly) merger is unsuccessful. These studies examine the cumulative return from the period just prior to the first public announcement of the proposed merger through the announcement of cancellation. Results range from a total return of –9.02 per cent to + 3.68 per cent, with an average of –2.88 percent. In unsuccessful mergers, therefore, stockholders in target firms lose on average nearly 3 per cent of the shares' value.

    But looking at the returns only through the termination date can be misleading. Other studies examining the period from six months prior to an offer to six months after the offer have found that the total return averages nearly +36 per cent, even though the offer was unsuccessful. Given the typical stock market reaction to unsuccessful negotiated mergers, this is a curious finding. The explanation for this seeming anomaly emerges when firms are divided into two groups: those eventually acquired by some other bidder, and those not acquired. Firms that were not acquired eventually lost the entire 36 per cent return. But firms subsequently acquired, earned an additional 20 per cent return above the initial 36 per cent, earning shareholders a total return of 56 per cent. Those earnings compare favorably to the overall average return of 30 percent earned by shareholders & of all companies successfully acquired. These results suggest that some form of resistance by management may be desirable. Playing hard to get may influence the initial suitor to increase the bid, or it may permit time for competing bids to be submitted. It is possible, however, to have too much of a good thing. When management actions are designed solely to eliminate a takeover by a specific bidder, then shareholders may be harmed. Nevertheless, antitakeover tactics do not deserve the blanket condemnation they receive in the press.

     

  1. 1 and 2 only

  2. 2 and 3 only

  3. 1, 2, and 4 only

  4. 2 and 4 only

  5. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Correct answer is (4). The study supported by author shows that the firms, which resisted takeover provided, better returns than those, which did not resist takeover. The correct answer to this shall be option (2) which tends to negate the above stated fact. (1) is incorrect because the third category of mergers shall have fewer returns than those claimed above. (2) Is correct because net effect described above in one year is lost in two years of study. Option (3) makes the contention of the author stronger and not weaker. (4) Weakens the author's contention.