English Language

English Reading Comprehension

3,503 Questions

English reading comprehension questions assess the ability to understand, analyze, and interpret written passages. Formats include paragraph rearrangement, cloze tests, and fact finding from text. Regular practice is essential for scoring well in the English sections of banking, SSC, and railway exams.

Passage based inferenceParagraph rearrangementCloze test fillingVocabulary replacementReading accuracy tests

English Reading Comprehension Questions

Multiple choice
  1. He called it very nice.

  2. He called it fruitful.

  3. He called it useful.

  4. He called it useless.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

“What a useless tree this is!"

Multiple choice
  1. It was about the post of a watchman.

  2. It was about the post of a night watchman.

  3. It was about the post of a gatekeeper.

  4. It was about the post of a peon.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

It matches with the information given in the passage.

Multiple choice
  1. Deaf

  2. Dumb

  3. Blind

  4. Helpless

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Concept based

Multiple choice
  1. By expanding his business across the river

  2. By selling other dairy products along with milk

  3. By working hard day and night

  4. By cheating his customers

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

"A milkman became very rich and prosperous through dishonest means."

Multiple choice
  1. celebrate his son's wedding

  2. become richer

  3. buy cows

  4. buy his own boat

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

It matches with the information given in the passage.

Multiple choice
  1. It got broken.

  2. It sank in the river.

  3. It turned upside down.

  4. It floated away.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

It matches with the information given in the passage.

Multiple choice
  1. It gave them relief from the sun.

  2. It gave them fruits.

  3. It gave them nothing.

  4. It gave them water.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The passage says, "I am extremely useful to you at this very moment, shielding you from the hot sun."

Multiple choice
  1. It is because nobody was healthy.

  2. It is because he found everybody dubious.

  3. It is because he wanted to select Raju.

  4. It is because he wanted to give less salary.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The passage says, "He found something dubious with each man."

Multiple choice
  1. Two

  2. Three

  3. One

  4. Four

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

The passage says, "Two men were treading along one summer day."

Multiple choice
  1. Happy

  2. Dubious

  3. Present

  4. Wrong

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Concept based

Multiple choice
  1. Large

  2. Good

  3. Ungrateful

  4. Useless

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Concept based

Multiple choice
  1. Because it was very hot.

  2. Because they were tired.

  3. Because they were thirsty.

  4. Because they wanted to eat fruit.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

It matches with the information given in the passage.

Multiple choice

Why does the author say ‘We are a nation of the hypocrites’? How is it demonstrated, if at all?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

After India became independent, one angry citizen asked Nehru as to what the difference was between the regime they had overthrown and the one they had ushered in. That he was able to speak to the prime minister of the nation in this manner was the difference between the two regimes, Nehru replied, politely.
What Nehru said was the essence of democracy. In a democracy, one should be able to voice one’s concern on any matter without fear or favor. As long as this element is present, there is no danger to democracy.
After over half a century if we are able to give an affirmative answer to this question, we may claim to be on the right track. If not, something is definitely amiss. But mere expression of it is not enough unless it seems to have been heard where it was intended to be heard in the first place; and is not merely heard, but necessary remedial action is taken wherever and whenever feasible and desirable. In other words, in a democracy public opinion should matter without exception.

A kind of ennui appears to have gripped everyone. Lack of governance during the past six decades and the growing unconcern displayed by those at the helm and the failings of the various pillars of democracy have added to this ennui. Ordinary citizens are not just victims of neglect and unconcern, even the judiciary has been suffering from the same kind of neglect and unconcern. 
We are a nation of hypocrites. On one hand, we make a demonstration of our allegiance to the constitution, while on the other we keep trampling over it whenever it suits us. We have more than 400 Articles in our constitution (it began with 395 Articles and has steadily been growing in number). One thought that since all articles are the product of the same constitution, all of them would carry equal weight, or would at least have the same degree of importance. But no, that is not the position. Some articles continue to be treated with complete disregard. For instance, most of the articles under Part IV, especially 44, 45, 46, 47 and 49 remain as mere embellishments. Talk of the Uniform Civil Code for citizens, many politicians will be up in arms as if it was blasphemous to talk about it; as if it was not a part of the constitution they seemingly VENERATE.

When will the time be ripe? With the kind of politicians lurking around, it is anybody’s guess if the time will ever be ripe. Indeed many politicians in private admit that reservation has done a great deal of harm to the nation in as much as it kept merit from surfacing in full bloom. I do not know if reservation on the basis of caste is allowed in any part of the world. I also do not know if considerations other than merit (nepotism excepted) are of any consequence in any part of the world. Is it not self-condemnation of those who led the country this long and failed to meet the basic requirements of the people and the nation? These people have much to answer to for the present ills.

  1. We have given ourselves a massive constitution that we cannot handle.

  2. Articles of the constitution are mere embellishments.

  3. Those taking oath by the constitution violate it the most.

  4. Those tasked to govern do not govern and deliver.

  5. People from all walks of life are victims of neglect and unconcern.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

(1) There is no gain in saying the fact that the author is preoccupied with the idea of a constitution that, according to him, has failed to deliver. Massive size of the constitution may be a factor, but that clearly does not demonstrate that ' We are a nation of the hypocrites’. (2) A hypocrite is he/she who says one thing and means or does quite the opposite. When the author says that some of the articles of the constitution are mere embellishments, he draws attention to this hypocritical positioning taken by those tasked to govern. Since this is practised routinely, it is hypocrisy of the worst kind. Even though this does not appear to apply universally, this is what the author seems to demonstrate. (3) This sounds like an exaggerated statement even though it is possible that a great number of people take oath by the constitution and violate it. Such violators can be called anything but hypocrites. (4) Failure of governance is no doubt a big issue here. This does not however demonstrate that we are a nation of the hypocrites. (5) This can be attributed to mis-governance or mal-governance, not to being hypocrite.

Multiple choice

The article leads to the conclusion that the author is

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

After India became independent, one angry citizen asked Nehru as to what the difference was between the regime they had overthrown and the one they had ushered in. That he was able to speak to the prime minister of the nation in this manner was the difference between the two regimes, Nehru replied, politely.
What Nehru said was the essence of democracy. In a democracy, one should be able to voice one’s concern on any matter without fear or favor. As long as this element is present, there is no danger to democracy.
After over half a century if we are able to give an affirmative answer to this question, we may claim to be on the right track. If not, something is definitely amiss. But mere expression of it is not enough unless it seems to have been heard where it was intended to be heard in the first place; and is not merely heard, but necessary remedial action is taken wherever and whenever feasible and desirable. In other words, in a democracy public opinion should matter without exception.

A kind of ennui appears to have gripped everyone. Lack of governance during the past six decades and the growing unconcern displayed by those at the helm and the failings of the various pillars of democracy have added to this ennui. Ordinary citizens are not just victims of neglect and unconcern, even the judiciary has been suffering from the same kind of neglect and unconcern. 
We are a nation of hypocrites. On one hand, we make a demonstration of our allegiance to the constitution, while on the other we keep trampling over it whenever it suits us. We have more than 400 Articles in our constitution (it began with 395 Articles and has steadily been growing in number). One thought that since all articles are the product of the same constitution, all of them would carry equal weight, or would at least have the same degree of importance. But no, that is not the position. Some articles continue to be treated with complete disregard. For instance, most of the articles under Part IV, especially 44, 45, 46, 47 and 49 remain as mere embellishments. Talk of the Uniform Civil Code for citizens, many politicians will be up in arms as if it was blasphemous to talk about it; as if it was not a part of the constitution they seemingly VENERATE.

When will the time be ripe? With the kind of politicians lurking around, it is anybody’s guess if the time will ever be ripe. Indeed many politicians in private admit that reservation has done a great deal of harm to the nation in as much as it kept merit from surfacing in full bloom. I do not know if reservation on the basis of caste is allowed in any part of the world. I also do not know if considerations other than merit (nepotism excepted) are of any consequence in any part of the world. Is it not self-condemnation of those who led the country this long and failed to meet the basic requirements of the people and the nation? These people have much to answer to for the present ills.

  1. highly critical of things having gone wrong after independence.

  2. self-introspective about what independent India could have done.

  3. critical that the policy of reservation has been prolonged.

  4. not satisfied with Nehru’s explanation.

  5. hugely disturbed by what has happened in post-independent India.

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
E Correct answer
Explanation

(1) The author points to things that have gone wrong after independence. Criticism means weighing of positives and negatives and coming to a conclusion. That does not appear to be the case here. (2) There is an element of self-introspection, but nothing of great importance. (3) The policy of reservation has indeed elicited strong disapproval of the author. But this is not the only element the author is unhappy about. (4) Nehru’s explanation only further invigorates the author to make an in-depth study of whatever went wrong in the country after independence. (5) There are many things in post independent India that has dismayed the author. In fact, much of what is occurring in the country has been disturbing him.

Multiple choice

What is the central theme of this passage?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

After India became independent, one angry citizen asked Nehru as to what the difference was between the regime they had overthrown and the one they had ushered in. That he was able to speak to the prime minister of the nation in this manner was the difference between the two regimes, Nehru replied, politely.
What Nehru said was the essence of democracy. In a democracy, one should be able to voice one’s concern on any matter without fear or favor. As long as this element is present, there is no danger to democracy.
After over half a century if we are able to give an affirmative answer to this question, we may claim to be on the right track. If not, something is definitely amiss. But mere expression of it is not enough unless it seems to have been heard where it was intended to be heard in the first place; and is not merely heard, but necessary remedial action is taken wherever and whenever feasible and desirable. In other words, in a democracy public opinion should matter without exception.

A kind of ennui appears to have gripped everyone. Lack of governance during the past six decades and the growing unconcern displayed by those at the helm and the failings of the various pillars of democracy have added to this ennui. Ordinary citizens are not just victims of neglect and unconcern, even the judiciary has been suffering from the same kind of neglect and unconcern. 
We are a nation of hypocrites. On one hand, we make a demonstration of our allegiance to the constitution, while on the other we keep trampling over it whenever it suits us. We have more than 400 Articles in our constitution (it began with 395 Articles and has steadily been growing in number). One thought that since all articles are the product of the same constitution, all of them would carry equal weight, or would at least have the same degree of importance. But no, that is not the position. Some articles continue to be treated with complete disregard. For instance, most of the articles under Part IV, especially 44, 45, 46, 47 and 49 remain as mere embellishments. Talk of the Uniform Civil Code for citizens, many politicians will be up in arms as if it was blasphemous to talk about it; as if it was not a part of the constitution they seemingly VENERATE.

When will the time be ripe? With the kind of politicians lurking around, it is anybody’s guess if the time will ever be ripe. Indeed many politicians in private admit that reservation has done a great deal of harm to the nation in as much as it kept merit from surfacing in full bloom. I do not know if reservation on the basis of caste is allowed in any part of the world. I also do not know if considerations other than merit (nepotism excepted) are of any consequence in any part of the world. Is it not self-condemnation of those who led the country this long and failed to meet the basic requirements of the people and the nation? These people have much to answer to for the present ills.

  1. Essence of democracy

  2. Lack of governance

  3. Failure of the Constitution

  4. Reservation policy

  5. Uniform Civil Code

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

(1) When an author visits and revisits the same issue a number of times, he is drawing readers attention to the central theme. Essence of democracy is the central theme of this passage as the author devotes major part of his energy on this point alone. (2) One of the important elements, but not the central theme. (3) Yet another important ingredient with which the author is preoccupied, but not the central theme as it is just briefly alluded in the course of discussion. (4) One of the very important factors that the author attributes to lack of governance, excellence and growth of merit, etc., but clearly not the central theme. (5) This is alluded to merely by way of an example, not the central theme.