Law Legal Studies ยท Commerce Accountancy

Contract Law

1,497 Questions

Contract Law encompasses the rules and statutes governing legally binding agreements between parties. This hub provides practice questions on essential topics like legal obligations, breach of contract, and termination clauses. These concepts are frequently tested in law entrance tests and various other competitive government examinations.

Legal obligationsVoid contractsBreach of contractCommunication of acceptanceStatute of FraudsContract clauses

Contract Law Questions

Multiple choice
  1. cancellation of the existing contract

  2. change in one or more terms of the contract

  3. substitution of the existing contract for a new one

  4. none of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Novation is the substitution of a new contract for an existing one, typically involving the replacement of one party or the alteration of terms with all parties' consent. The original contract is extinguished and replaced by the new contract. It is not merely cancellation (which ends without replacement) or modification (which changes terms without substitution).

Multiple choice
  1. revocation

  2. counter offer

  3. rejection of offer by offeree

  4. all of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

An offer may lapse through revocation (offeror withdraws it), counter-offer (offeree rejects original offer by proposing new terms), or rejection (offeree expressly refuses). All three are distinct ways an offer can terminate before acceptance, making 'all of these' the correct answer.

Multiple choice
  1. valid

  2. void

  3. voidable

  4. any of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Collateral agreements connected to illegal agreements inherit the invalidity of the main contract in many cases. They may be void (if inseparably connected), voidable (if they can be severed), or potentially valid (if completely independent of the illegal purpose). The specific outcome depends on the circumstances and jurisdiction, making 'any of these' the correct answer.

Multiple choice
  1. let the seller beware

  2. let the buyer beware

  3. let the creditor beware

  4. none of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

Caveat emptor is Latin for 'let the buyer beware.' This principle places the responsibility on the buyer to perform due diligence before purchase. The seller is not automatically liable for defects unless they actively concealed them.

Multiple choice
  1. novation

  2. recission

  3. alteration

  4. all of the above

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Contracts can be discharged by mutual agreement through novation (new contract replaces old), rescission (cancellation by mutual consent), or alteration (modifying terms). All three are valid methods where parties agree to end or modify their contractual obligations.

Multiple choice
  1. express or implied agreement

  2. ratification

  3. operation of law

  4. all of the above

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

An agency relationship can be formed through express or implied agreement (contract), by ratification (principal approves unauthorized acts after the fact), or by operation of law (necessity, estoppel, co-habitation). All three are recognized methods under agency law.

Multiple choice
  1. guarantee

  2. warranty

  3. condition

  4. term

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

A condition is a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract - its breach gives the aggrieved party the right to reject the goods (rescind). A warranty is a minor stipulation - breach only gives right to damages, not rescission. Guarantee is not a Sale of Goods Act term.

Multiple choice
  1. Trading with an enemy

  2. Trafficking in public offices

  3. Marriage brokerage contracts

  4. Contracts to do impossible acts

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
D Correct answer
Explanation

Agreements opposed to public policy are void. The heads of public policy include: trading with enemies (undermines national security), trafficking in public offices (corruption of public administration), and marriage brokerage contracts (interference with domestic relations). Contracts to do impossible acts are void for a different reason - impossibility of performance makes the agreement incapable of being performed, not because it violates public policy. This is a distinct legal doctrine.

Multiple choice
  1. There can be a stranger to a contract.

  2. There can be a stranger to a consideration.

  3. There can be a stranger to both contract & consideration.

  4. None of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
B Correct answer
Explanation

The doctrine of privity of contract provides that a person who is not a party to a contract cannot sue on it. Therefore, there can be no stranger to a contract - only parties to the contract can enforce it. However, consideration can move from a stranger to the contract - a third party can provide consideration even if they are not a party to the agreement. For example, a father promises to pay someone if they marry his daughter - the father is a stranger to the marriage contract but provides the consideration. This distinction is fundamental to contract law.

Multiple choice
  1. voidable initio

  2. voidable

  3. valid

  4. unlawful

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Option A contains a typo - it should read 'void ab initio' (void from the beginning), not 'voidable initio'. The law is clear that a minor's agreement is void ab initio - it was never valid from the outset and cannot be enforced by either party. This is a fundamental protection for minors. 'Voidable' means initially valid but can be avoided, which is incorrect for minors. 'Valid' is clearly wrong as minors lack capacity. 'Unlawful' refers to illegality, not capacity issues. Despite the typo in option A, the intended answer is clearly the void ab initio doctrine.

Multiple choice
  1. is discharged

  2. becomes enforceable

  3. becomes void

  4. none of these

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

When parties fulfill their contractual obligations completely, the contract stands discharged. Discharge by performance is the most natural way to end a contract - both parties have done what they promised. The contract doesn't become void (C) or merely enforceable (B) - it's completed and closed.

Multiple choice
  1. void

  2. voidable

  3. illegal

  4. enforceable

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
A Correct answer
Explanation

Agreements with minors are void ab initio (void from the beginning) under Indian Contract Act, Section 11. Minors lack contractual capacity, so any contract with them is inherently void, not merely voidable. This protects minors from being bound by agreements they cannot fully understand. Voidable (B) would mean it's valid until challenged, which isn't the case.

Multiple choice
  1. remission

  2. recission

  3. novation

  4. alteration

Reveal answer Fill a bubble to check yourself
C Correct answer
Explanation

Novation is the complete substitution of a new contract in place of an old one, discharging the original contract entirely. It requires mutual agreement and can involve changing parties (new debtor replaces old) or changing terms. Remission (A) reduces obligation, recission (B) cancels for fraud/mistake, alteration (D) modifies terms - none involve total substitution like novation.