Propositional Logic: Logical Arguments and Categorical Propositions
This quiz will test your knowledge of propositional logic, logical arguments, and categorical propositions.
Questions
Which of the following is a propositional logic connective?
- And
- Or
- Not
- All of the above
What is the truth value of the proposition "(P ∧ Q) → R" when P is true, Q is false, and R is true?
- True
- False
- Indeterminate
Which of the following is a categorical proposition?
- All men are mortal
- Socrates is a man
- The sky is blue
- None of the above
What is the subject term of the proposition "All dogs are mammals"?
- Dogs
- Mammals
- Animals
- None of the above
What is the predicate term of the proposition "No cats are fish"?
- Cats
- Fish
- Animals
- None of the above
Which of the following is a valid logical argument?
- All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
- All dogs are mammals. Cats are not dogs. Therefore, cats are not mammals.
- Some birds can fly. Penguins are birds. Therefore, penguins can fly.
- None of the above
Which of the following is a sound logical argument?
- All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
- All dogs are mammals. Cats are not dogs. Therefore, cats are not mammals.
- Some birds can fly. Penguins are birds. Therefore, penguins can fly.
- None of the above
Which of the following is a fallacy?
- Affirming the consequent
- Denying the antecedent
- Appeal to ignorance
- All of the above
What is the fallacy of affirming the consequent?
- Assuming that the conclusion of an argument is true because the premises are true
- Assuming that the antecedent of an argument is false because the conclusion is false
- Assuming that a proposition is true because it has not been proven false
- Assuming that a proposition is false because it has not been proven true
What is the fallacy of denying the antecedent?
- Assuming that the conclusion of an argument is true because the premises are true
- Assuming that the antecedent of an argument is false because the conclusion is false
- Assuming that a proposition is true because it has not been proven false
- Assuming that a proposition is false because it has not been proven true
What is the fallacy of appeal to ignorance?
- Assuming that the conclusion of an argument is true because the premises are true
- Assuming that the antecedent of an argument is false because the conclusion is false
- Assuming that a proposition is true because it has not been proven false
- Assuming that a proposition is false because it has not been proven true
What is the fallacy of assuming that a proposition is false because it has not been proven true?
- Affirming the consequent
- Denying the antecedent
- Appeal to ignorance
- All of the above
Which of the following is a syllogism?
- All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
- All dogs are mammals. Cats are not dogs. Therefore, cats are not mammals.
- Some birds can fly. Penguins are birds. Therefore, penguins can fly.
- None of the above
Which of the following is a categorical syllogism?
- All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
- All dogs are mammals. Cats are not dogs. Therefore, cats are not mammals.
- Some birds can fly. Penguins are birds. Therefore, penguins can fly.
- None of the above
Which of the following is a hypothetical syllogism?
- All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
- All dogs are mammals. Cats are not dogs. Therefore, cats are not mammals.
- Some birds can fly. Penguins are birds. Therefore, penguins can fly.
- None of the above