Contract Defenses
This quiz covers various defenses that can be asserted in response to a breach of contract claim.
Questions
Which of the following is NOT a valid contract defense?
- Impossibility
- Frustration of Purpose
- Unconscionability
- Statute of Frauds
What is the legal doctrine that excuses performance of a contract when an unforeseen event makes it impossible or impracticable to perform?
- Impossibility
- Frustration of Purpose
- Unconscionability
- Duress
Which of the following is NOT an element of the defense of frustration of purpose?
- The purpose of the contract is frustrated by an unforeseen event.
- The frustration is substantial.
- The party asserting the defense did not assume the risk of frustration.
- The party asserting the defense caused the frustration.
What is the legal doctrine that allows a court to refuse to enforce a contract that is unconscionable?
- Impossibility
- Frustration of Purpose
- Unconscionability
- Duress
Which of the following is NOT an element of the defense of unconscionability?
- The contract is one-sided.
- The terms of the contract are oppressive or unfair.
- The party asserting the defense did not have a meaningful opportunity to negotiate the terms of the contract.
- The party asserting the defense is a sophisticated businessperson.
What is the legal doctrine that allows a court to refuse to enforce a contract that was entered into under duress?
- Impossibility
- Frustration of Purpose
- Unconscionability
- Duress
Which of the following is NOT an element of the defense of duress?
- The party asserting the defense was threatened with physical harm.
- The party asserting the defense was threatened with economic harm.
- The threat was made by the other party to the contract.
- The party asserting the defense had a reasonable alternative to entering into the contract.
What is the legal doctrine that allows a court to refuse to enforce a contract that is illegal?
- Impossibility
- Frustration of Purpose
- Unconscionability
- Illegality
Which of the following is NOT an element of the defense of illegality?
- The contract is prohibited by statute.
- The contract is contrary to public policy.
- The party asserting the defense knew or should have known that the contract was illegal.
- The party asserting the defense benefited from the illegal contract.
What is the legal doctrine that allows a court to refuse to enforce a contract that is void for lack of capacity?
- Impossibility
- Frustration of Purpose
- Unconscionability
- Lack of Capacity
Which of the following is NOT an element of the defense of lack of capacity?
- The party asserting the defense was a minor.
- The party asserting the defense was mentally incompetent.
- The party asserting the defense was intoxicated.
- The party asserting the defense was under the influence of drugs.
What is the legal doctrine that allows a court to refuse to enforce a contract that is void for mistake?
- Impossibility
- Frustration of Purpose
- Unconscionability
- Mistake
Which of the following is NOT an element of the defense of mistake?
- The mistake was material.
- The mistake was mutual.
- The mistake was unilateral.
- The party asserting the defense was not negligent in making the mistake.
What is the legal doctrine that allows a court to refuse to enforce a contract that is void for fraud?
- Impossibility
- Frustration of Purpose
- Unconscionability
- Fraud
Which of the following is NOT an element of the defense of fraud?
- The party asserting the defense was deceived by the other party.
- The deception was material.
- The deception was intentional.
- The party asserting the defense relied on the deception.