Home › Quizzes › Defenses in International Criminal Law

Defenses in International Criminal Law

This quiz is designed to assess your understanding of the various defenses available in international criminal law. These defenses can be used by individuals accused of committing international crimes to argue that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions.

15 Questions Published
Play Quiz Practise this topic out loud

Questions

Question 1 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following is NOT a defense in international criminal law?

  1. Lack of criminal intent
  2. Self-defense
  3. Necessity
  4. Superior orders
Question 2 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the defense of lack of criminal intent?

  1. The defendant did not know that their actions were criminal.
  2. The defendant was acting under duress.
  3. The defendant was acting in self-defense.
  4. The defendant was insane at the time of the crime.
Question 3 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the defense of self-defense?

  1. The defendant was acting to protect themselves or others from imminent harm.
  2. The defendant was acting under duress.
  3. The defendant was acting in the heat of passion.
  4. The defendant was insane at the time of the crime.
Question 4 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the defense of necessity?

  1. The defendant was acting to prevent a greater harm.
  2. The defendant was acting under duress.
  3. The defendant was acting in the heat of passion.
  4. The defendant was insane at the time of the crime.
Question 5 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the defense of duress?

  1. The defendant was acting under the threat of imminent harm.
  2. The defendant was acting to prevent a greater harm.
  3. The defendant was acting in the heat of passion.
  4. The defendant was insane at the time of the crime.
Question 6 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

What is the defense of insanity?

  1. The defendant was unable to understand the nature and quality of their actions.
  2. The defendant was acting under duress.
  3. The defendant was acting in the heat of passion.
  4. The defendant was acting to prevent a greater harm.
Question 7 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the defense of self-defense?

  1. The defendant must have been acting to protect themselves or others from imminent harm.
  2. The defendant must have used reasonable force.
  3. The defendant must have been aware of the imminent harm.
  4. The defendant must have been acting in the heat of passion.
Question 8 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the defense of necessity?

  1. The defendant must have been acting to prevent a greater harm.
  2. The defendant must have used reasonable force.
  3. The defendant must have been aware of the greater harm.
  4. The defendant must have been acting in the heat of passion.
Question 9 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the defense of duress?

  1. The defendant must have been acting under the threat of imminent harm.
  2. The defendant must have used reasonable force.
  3. The defendant must have been aware of the imminent harm.
  4. The defendant must have had no other way to avoid the imminent harm.
Question 10 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the defense of insanity?

  1. The defendant must have been unable to understand the nature and quality of their actions.
  2. The defendant must have been acting under duress.
  3. The defendant must have been acting in the heat of passion.
  4. The defendant must have been unable to control their actions.
Question 11 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

In which of the following cases would the defense of self-defense be most likely to succeed?

  1. A person who kills another person in a bar fight.
  2. A person who kills another person in order to protect their property.
  3. A person who kills another person in order to prevent them from committing a crime.
  4. A person who kills another person in order to save their own life.
Question 12 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

In which of the following cases would the defense of necessity be most likely to succeed?

  1. A person who steals food in order to feed their starving family.
  2. A person who breaks into a house in order to escape a fire.
  3. A person who kills another person in order to prevent them from committing a crime.
  4. A person who destroys property in order to prevent a greater harm.
Question 13 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

In which of the following cases would the defense of duress be most likely to succeed?

  1. A person who kills another person in order to protect their family.
  2. A person who steals money in order to pay a ransom demand.
  3. A person who breaks into a house in order to escape a fire.
  4. A person who kills another person in order to prevent them from committing a crime.
Question 14 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

In which of the following cases would the defense of insanity be most likely to succeed?

  1. A person who kills another person in a bar fight.
  2. A person who kills another person in order to protect their property.
  3. A person who kills another person in order to prevent them from committing a crime.
  4. A person who kills another person because they believe that they are a demon.
Question 15 Multiple Choice (Single Answer)

Which of the following is the most important factor in determining whether a defense is successful?

  1. The facts of the case.
  2. The law.
  3. The judge.
  4. The jury.
← Back to Quizzes