Metaethics: Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism
This quiz will test your understanding of the metaethical theories of moral cognitivism and non-cognitivism.
Questions
Which of the following is a central claim of moral cognitivism?
- Moral statements are objective truths.
- Moral statements are subjective opinions.
- Moral statements are meaningless.
- Moral statements are emotive expressions.
Which of the following is a central claim of moral non-cognitivism?
- Moral statements are objective truths.
- Moral statements are subjective opinions.
- Moral statements are meaningless.
- Moral statements are emotive expressions.
Which of the following is a common argument against moral cognitivism?
- The is-ought problem.
- The problem of moral disagreement.
- The problem of moral relativism.
- All of the above.
Which of the following is a common argument against moral non-cognitivism?
- The naturalistic fallacy.
- The problem of moral motivation.
- The problem of moral objectivity.
- All of the above.
Which of the following philosophers is most closely associated with moral cognitivism?
- Plato
- Aristotle
- Immanuel Kant
- John Stuart Mill
Which of the following philosophers is most closely associated with moral non-cognitivism?
- David Hume
- G.E. Moore
- Bertrand Russell
- A.J. Ayer
Which of the following is a common criticism of moral cognitivism?
- It is too abstract and脱离现实.
- It is too dogmatic and intolerant of other viewpoints.
- It is too difficult to apply to real-world problems.
- All of the above.
Which of the following is a common criticism of moral non-cognitivism?
- It is too relativistic and subjective.
- It is too emotivist and irrational.
- It is too nihilistic and pessimistic.
- All of the above.
Which of the following is a possible implication of moral cognitivism?
- There is one true morality that applies to everyone.
- Moral disagreements can be resolved through rational argument.
- Moral progress is possible.
- All of the above.
Which of the following is a possible implication of moral non-cognitivism?
- There is no such thing as objective right or wrong.
- Moral disagreements cannot be resolved through rational argument.
- Moral progress is impossible.
- All of the above.
Which of the following is a common objection to the is-ought problem?
- The is-ought problem is not a real problem.
- The is-ought problem can be solved by appealing to moral intuitions.
- The is-ought problem can be solved by appealing to religious beliefs.
- The is-ought problem can be solved by appealing to scientific evidence.
Which of the following is a common objection to the problem of moral disagreement?
- The problem of moral disagreement is not a real problem.
- The problem of moral disagreement can be solved by appealing to moral intuitions.
- The problem of moral disagreement can be solved by appealing to religious beliefs.
- The problem of moral disagreement can be solved by appealing to scientific evidence.
Which of the following is a common objection to the problem of moral relativism?
- The problem of moral relativism is not a real problem.
- The problem of moral relativism can be solved by appealing to moral intuitions.
- The problem of moral relativism can be solved by appealing to religious beliefs.
- The problem of moral relativism can be solved by appealing to scientific evidence.
Which of the following is a possible solution to the is-ought problem?
- Appeal to moral intuitions.
- Appeal to religious beliefs.
- Appeal to scientific evidence.
- All of the above.
Which of the following is a possible solution to the problem of moral disagreement?
- Appeal to moral intuitions.
- Appeal to religious beliefs.
- Appeal to scientific evidence.
- All of the above.
Which of the following is a possible solution to the problem of moral relativism?
- Appeal to moral intuitions.
- Appeal to religious beliefs.
- Appeal to scientific evidence.
- All of the above.