English Grammar and Vocabulary Quiz - 4

The correct answer is 'so as not to' which is a proper idiom meaning 'in order to not'. 'I took a cab so as not to be late' is grammatically correct. Option B 'in order to not' is incorrect because 'not' should not be separated from 'to' - it should be 'in order not to'. Option C 'to avoid' would require 'being' after it ('to avoid being late'), not the bare infinitive 'be'. Option D has both grammatical errors ('wont' should be 'won't') and structural issues.

'However' is a conjunctive adverb used to introduce a contrasting statement. The first sentence mentions a benefit (traveling faster), and the second introduces a drawback (parking problems). 'Moreover' and 'Besides' add similar information, while 'Although' is a subordinating conjunction that requires a different sentence structure.

The correct answer is 'therefore' which shows logical consequence between two independent clauses. 'The population is increasing and therefore we need more food' presents a cause-effect relationship. 'Therefore' is a conjunctive adverb that properly connects the idea that population growth creates a need for more food resources. Option A 'so' would need different sentence structure. Option C 'then' doesn't convey the logical consequence as precisely. Option D 'since' would indicate cause rather than effect.

The correct answer is 'lay' which is the past tense of the irregular verb 'lie' (to recline or rest in a horizontal position). 'The King lay and slept for five days' is correct because the King is the subject performing the action of lying down. Many students confuse 'lie' (intransitive, meaning to recline) with 'lay' (transitive, meaning to place something). The past tense of 'lie' is 'lay', while the past tense of 'lay' is 'laid'. 'Lied' means to tell a falsehood, and 'layed' is a common misspelling.

'Apples' is a countable noun, so 'a few' is used to indicate a small quantity. 'Little' and 'a little' are used for uncountable nouns. 'Few' without the article 'a' often carries a negative connotation meaning 'not many', whereas 'a few' means 'some'.

The correct answer is 'take'. After the verb 'let' in the structure 'let + object + bare infinitive', we use the base form of the verb without 'to'. 'Thank you for letting me take your dog for a walk' follows this pattern correctly. 'Let' is a causative verb that requires the bare infinitive (verb without 'to'). Option A 'taking' would be used with 'allow' or 'permit', not 'let'. Options B and C ('have' and 'having') don't fit grammatically in this structure.

The correct answer is 'up'. The phrasal verb 'put up' means to provide someone with accommodation or lodging. 'Can you put me up for the weekend?' correctly asks if someone can provide a place to stay. 'Put up' is a common phrasal verb in hospitality contexts. Option A 'put in' means to submit or insert. Option B 'put down' can mean to criticize or euthanize. Option D 'put away' means to store something in its proper place. None of these fit the context of providing accommodation.

The correct answer is 'during' which is the best preposition to indicate a time period or duration. 'The number of tigers in the sanctuary has increased during the last 15 years' correctly uses 'during' to show that the increase happened over the course of this time period. 'During' is used with periods of time. Option B 'since' would typically require perfect tense and a specific starting point. Option C 'from' would need 'to' ('from 2008 to 2023'). Option D 'for' is used with duration but 'during' is more natural with 'the last 15 years'. Note: The sentence contains a grammar error - 'have' should be 'has' since 'number' is singular.

The correct answer is 'near'. 'Turtles can sleep suspended near the surface of the water' correctly uses 'near' to indicate position in proximity to the water surface. Turtles can float or remain suspended just below or at the surface. 'Near' is the most precise preposition for this spatial relationship. Option A 'on' would imply touching the surface. Option C 'along' suggests movement or parallel positioning. Option D 'at' is less natural for describing proximity to a surface in this context.

The correct answer is 'of'. The phrase 'victims of' is the correct prepositional phrase used with 'victims' to indicate what they have suffered from. 'Should compensation be paid to victims of nuclear tests?' correctly asks about people who suffered harm from nuclear testing. 'Victims of' is the standard collocation - victims suffer from or experience something. Option B 'victims for' would indicate purpose. Option C 'due to' would be used with the cause, not 'victims'. Option D 'because of' is a phrase indicating cause but doesn't collocate with 'victims'.

The correct answer is 'for'. The idiom 'zest for' is the correct expression meaning enthusiasm, passion, or eagerness. 'Do Indians have more zest for life than others?' correctly uses 'zest for life', a common expression meaning enthusiasm for living. 'Zest' collocates with 'for' when describing enthusiasm or passion for something. Option A 'zest in' is not the standard collocation. Option B 'zest from' doesn't make sense in this context. Option C 'zest with' is not the correct preposition for this idiom.

The correct answer is 'in case'. 'In case' is used to express doing something as a precaution against something happening. 'We have bought extra food in case our friends stay over' means the extra food is a precaution in the event that friends visit. 'In case' introduces a conditional possibility. Option A 'if' is possible but less precise for showing precaution. Option B 'so' would need different structure. Option D 'as long as' introduces a condition rather than a precaution. 'In case' best captures the idea of preparation for a possible future event.

The correct answer is 'lose'. 'It's impossible not to lose faith in the turbulent times like these' correctly uses 'lose faith', which means to stop believing or trusting in something. 'Lose' is the correct spelling (lose vs. loose are commonly confused). 'Lose' is a verb meaning to fail to keep or cease to have. 'Loose' is an adjective meaning not tight. 'Loosen' is a verb meaning to make less tight. 'Lost' is the past tense of 'lose' but doesn't fit the infinitive structure after 'to'. Note: The sentence has a typo - 'Its' should be 'It's' (contraction of 'it is').

The correct answer is 'in'. The verb 'trust' takes the preposition 'in' when expressing confidence or belief in someone or something. 'Do you trust in computers to make the world a better place?' correctly uses 'trust in' to express having confidence or faith in computers. 'Trust in' is the standard prepositional phrase. Option A 'trust of' would indicate possession, not the verb. Option B 'trust for' doesn't collocate in this context. Option D 'trust on' is incorrect - 'trust' with 'on' is used in different contexts like 'rely on' or 'count on', not 'trust on'.

The correct phrase is 'rather small' - meaning 'somewhat small' or 'quite small'. This is a standard English collocation where 'rather' modifies the adjective to express degree. Option A would need 'a bit small' to be grammatically correct, 'even small' is not idiomatic, and 'much small' is grammatically incorrect (should be 'much too small').

The correct spellings are 'advised' (past participle of 'advise') and 'canvass' (meaning to survey people systematically for opinions). Options B and D incorrectly use 'adviced' which is not a valid English word. Option C uses 'canvas' which refers to cloth material, not the verb meaning to survey. This tests spelling of commonly confused words.

'Each and every one' is the correct phrase when emphasizing individual distinctness - 'everyone' and 'everybody' are single words meaning 'all people'. While 'everyone' and 'everybody' are grammatically possible, the fixed phrase 'each and every one' is the idiomatic expression in this context. 'All' would require 'each and all' which is not standard.

The correct sequence is 'bought' (past tense of 'buy' - purchase) and 'brought' (past tense of 'bring' - transport). You would have purchased (bought) sweets, and the sweets were transported (brought) yesterday. Option B has them backwards, and options A and D repeat the same verb incorrectly for the different actions.

'Return' already contains the meaning of 'back', so 'return back' is redundant. Similarly, 'repeatedly' means 'again and again', so 'ask you again' is redundant. Option B avoids both redundancies by using 'return' alone and 'repeatedly ask' without the unnecessary 'again'. This tests proper word choice and avoiding pleonasm.