To answer this question, we need to understand what statement coverage is and why it may not be sufficient to identify all bugs.

Statement coverage is a metric used in software testing to measure the percentage of statements in a program that have been executed during testing. The goal of achieving complete statement coverage is to ensure that every statement in the code has been executed at least once.

Option A states that even with complete statement coverage, bugs may still be missed if the failure occurs only when a specific condition is met. For example, if there is an IF statement in the code and the failure occurs only when the TRUE branch of the IF statement is executed, but the test cases used for coverage only pass through the FALSE branch, then the bug may be missed.

Option B states that the failure may depend on the program's inability to handle specific data values. This means that even if all statements are covered, bugs may still be missed if the failure occurs due to the program not handling certain data values correctly. For example, if the program crashes or produces incorrect results when a specific input value is provided, but the test cases used for coverage do not include that specific value, then the bug may be missed.

Option C correctly states that both Option A and Option B are valid reasons why bugs may be missed even with complete statement coverage. Both the failure occurring only when specific conditions are met and the program's inability to handle specific data values can result in bugs being missed.

Option D is incorrect because it suggests that not testing code that customers are unlikely to execute is a reason why bugs may be missed. While it is true that testing code that is more likely to be executed by customers is generally prioritized, it does not directly relate to the question of achieving complete statement coverage and missing bugs.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option C. Both Option A and Option B are valid reasons why bugs may be missed even with complete statement coverage.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, you need to understand the Defect Module in the context it is being referred to. The Defect Module is commonly used in software testing or bug tracking systems to track and manage reported defects or issues.

In the Defect Module, views are typically used to provide different perspectives or filters on the defects data. Each view can display a subset of the available defects based on specific criteria or conditions.

According to the question, the correct answer is A) one. This means that there is only one view available in the Defect Module. This single view may provide a comprehensive overview of all the defects or may be pre-filtered to show specific categories or priorities of defects.

It's important to note that the number of available views in a Defect Module can vary depending on the specific bug tracking or testing system being used. Some systems may offer multiple predefined views, while others may allow users to create custom views based on their specific needs.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation